This is probably a good time to remind everyone to set up the registration lock.
Am I missing something or is this setting not available on Android?
I found it. It’s in the Account settings, under pin settings.
Someone was talking about Session in another post, the open source app that uses signal code, but without the need to register a phone number.
Can someone recommend it ? Has it been audited ? Because when it comes to cryptography, even if it’s supposedly the same code as Signal, it still needs to be independently audited to be trusted.
Session runs on the cryptocurrency backed loki network.
Ok, didn’t know that. I will have so much catching up to do with documentations one of these days… The onion routing seemed cool but I barely read anything on it yet.
I Hope it’s not some bullshit whitepaper just to add value to a blockchain/token.
I prefer XMPP. Probably the best solution available.
From my perspective, Matrix (https://notes.nicfab.it/en/posts/matrix/matrix/) or XMPP (https://notes.nicfab.it/en/posts/xmpp/xmpp/ - https://notes.nicfab.it/en/posts/snikket/) are the best solutions. I also used Session (https://notes.nicfab.it/en/posts/session/).
I tried finding the GitHub issue that asks for Signal to stop relying on phone numbers. I can’t find it. Do you [whoever is reading this] know where the issue is at?
Github Issues are only for bug reports, the Username feature is tracked here https://community.signalusers.org/t/usernames-in-signal/9157
Now you can request “enhancements” too in the issue section. See https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues
That’s… nice but I’m talking about how Signal handles Github issues
My bad, I thought enhancement requests were widespread all around Github, because I didn’t check how Signal handles issues there.
It’s abominable that Signal still requires a phone number.
How else are they going to track you?
No, seriously. Even if the messages are encrypted, the metadata including your account info and the account info of everyone you talk to are not. In a lot of these cases, they don’t have to have the actual contents of the messages to have a pretty clear picture of what you might be talking about!
With a phone number that’s almost certainly registered to your real identity, it makes it trivial to track what you as a person is doing even without breaking the encryption! An encrypted messenger that requires anything related to your real identity to get an account is security theatre.
For example: if you suddenly start messaging back and fourth with an account, and that account happens to have the same phone number as the one on the business card and website of an out of state abortion clinic worker, and your own phone number’s area code just so happens to fall in a state that banned abortions after Roe v Wade got trashed, it juuuust might imply a few things about you. They can’t definitively prove what the messages were, but if your state criminalizes any and all attempts to get an abortion anywhere, it’s probably enough to get a warrant against you.
What viable user-friendly (i.e. no account creation required) options are there? I just want my messages between friends and family to not be mined by greedy corporations.
https://element.io/get-started
Don’t require phone or email. It’s encrypted, and they are continuity improving their system to fix some lack of encrypted content/metadata.
Matrix is pretty good.
The problem is not the account, but the mandatory phone number verification.
XMPP with the Android Conversations or BlabberIM client works pretty well as an alternative and uses the same high quality encryption as Signal.
The problem is not the account, but the mandatory phone number verification
Yes, it is. At least from the perspective of normal users.
The reason for WhatsApp (or Telegram or iMessage) becoming as big as it is was the convenience (later the network effect, of course, too) of just entering your phone number and then it just works™. No server selection, no password to remember, totally hassle free—that is the argument I get to hear very often.
And honestly, I have no idea, how we could provide a similar conveniance that is fool proof and secure and private.
I was referring to the “no account creation required” and given how other online services seem to be doing fine with accounts I don’t think it is as big of a hurdle as you make it seem.
Of course automatic discovery of accounts based on phone numbers is a different topic, but there are also plenty of people who hate that feature (Telegram has a special feature to not allow that even).
deleted by creator
Session is a pretty good one in my opinion. Also matrix has some privacy related concerns with the amount of meta data being shared on every home server.
Briar?
luckily, from the warrants they’ve received in the past we know that they don’t store metadata, and the only information about the requested numbers that they’ve been able to provide to the court were the date of registering an account and the last time they were online, both in Unix epoch format: https://signal.org/bigbrother/
You have to keep the bigger context in mind here. Even if Signal only tracks your phone number, it can be easily correlated with other data that’s associated with you that’s aggregated from your online footprint.
This only tells us what they do by default and without gag-order. They could still be forced to log specific users and are barred from telling us by legal request.
Furthermore, it is known from Telegram disclosures that the FBI has been approaching staff from messenger companies with the offer of quite a lot of money to act as moles inside these companies.
As long as Signal is a centralized service with servers in the US, neither problem can be solved and that makes Signal inherently unsafe to use.
What you wrote is simply wrong.
Signal encrypt metadata to the best of their capacity. On the contrary matrix, xmpp, telegram, WhatsApp don’t (unless sth changed since last year)
For example on my matrix server I could read the IP, username and time of each message.
This is what they tell you. Since signal isn’t self-hostable or federated, you can’t verify that.
As far as i understand this is a client side implementation. So it’s verifiable.
They probably do it to prevents spam/abuse. It is supposed to be a better WhatsApp after all, not a completely federated software. So it gotta be somewhat user friendly.
What? It’s easier for spammers/scammers to enumerate phone numbers (because they follow a specific pattern) than usernames or random IDs.
Probably referring to that it’s harder for scammers to create scam accounts because they need to verify the phone number is actually theirs before the account can send messages. IMO, still not worth requiring a phone number for the 90% of legitimate users.
There are websites online that offer 10 minute phone numbers.
Not sure if Signal does this, but most websites will automatically look up the phone number registration, see that it’s from one of those companies, and reject it.
There are these services still around.
https://sms24.me/en/messages/Signal
You’ll notice most numbers aren’t from US. The ability to detect VoIP numbers only applies to NA.
The original argument is that Signal does not want to create a social graph of user accounts on their server and rather rely on the already existing one of the users phone book.
But that is very narrow thinking and ultimately counterproductive as others have pointed out here already.
Ight, imma delete Signal
This is old news though?Never mindThis post is a year old
Yes, exactly
Who thought that requiring phone number and relying on third party services would reduce users privacy /s
People seriously still use Signal? lmao
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Uh oh. I somehow blocked Dessalines and I can’t unblock them cuz they’re an admin.
You can care about privacy, or you can ask a phone number during sign up. Those things are mutually exclusive.
Don’t use Signal you care about privacy.
Don’t let perfection be the enemy of good. All my friends and family use Signal, it was a multi-year effort to pull that off. Signal will roll out usernames faster than the tide will turn, so let’s take our wins and learn to be better.
Yhea.
I can almost exclusively chat with my social circle with signal now, been using it since 8-9 years.
I’ve tried xmpp, matrix and some other. Signal is the only one that stuck, it’s not perfect but it’s fucking fine from my perspective.
deleted by creator
Element had a lot of issue last time i’ve tested it: push notification issue, convulated ui, e2e encryption disabled by default, slow server.
I had my own server for a while for my SO and I and we often missed each other messages plus the client was draining my phone battery.
I love the briding capacity of matrix, I woulf like to spend an evening setting that up in order to aggregate all those messaging apps but I’m afraid it’s not worth it.
deleted by creator
Yhea they’re improving quite a lot, it’s great to read. Do they encrypt metadata now?
deleted by creator
And yes signal is far from perfect and moxie view on some key point such as centralization are not mine. Still it’s solid software .
This is my argument for Telegram. It’s clients are open source and has good Linux support. And unlike Signal it’s actually nice to use. (non-tech people usually dislike using Signal, but the feedback from Telegram is very positive)
Except e2ee isn’t on by default at telegram.
That’s why I prefer Matrix. But it’s hard to convince people to use Matrix so Telegram it is.
You’re conflating privacy with anonymity. Signal is not anonymous, but it is private.
I can’t fathom why they insist on sticking with this. It’s so obviously a de-anonymization technique, which is completely at odds with the rest of their stated goals. I haven’t made a Signal account for exactly this reason.
