• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    300
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Uber was always intended to be taxis that ignore the laws and regulations of taxis and put all of the vehicle maintenance on the drivers who are paid through tips instead of Uber.

    Not sure why anyone didn’t see that from the very beginning.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      120
      ·
      5 months ago

      And relieve corporate from all sorts of other liabilities, placing those on the individual drivers, too.

      Workers’ Comp claims? Malfeasance (driver or passenger)? Health insurance? Paid time off? Vehicle insurance? All fall to the driver.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        And they had thousands if not millions of drivers (worldwide) who didn’t give a shit about any of those things either.

        So they had a ready made work force waiting to be just as shitty people as the taxi companies by not giving a fuck about those things either.

        And that’s where opportunity is often found. Covered in shit

      • SonicDeathTaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can do that with my local taxi company anyway so they don’t even have that to differentiate themselves.

        • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s cool. Where at? I mean, I haven’t seen any taxi in a place I’ve ever visited with an app.

          And then there’s the issue of knowing what app before you get there, or just trusting the sign on the side of the taxi, and subsequently the app to not farm your data.

            • PunnyName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              35
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              When Uber first arrived, fuck yeah. Taxis would take stupid routes to run the meter up to overcharge you. Often the drivers were extremely belligerent or ornery for no same reason. Using taxis has been a terrible experience for many.

              • lordnikon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                the other issue that Uber helped with in the beginning was mess with Mob controlled taxi cartels that used regulation as a shield that’s why service was so poor. By skating those laws it put some market presure to improve slightly. but now that they got so big it’s back to being cappy again and the mob has moved into that market as well now.

                • ripcord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  the mob has moved into that market as well now.

                  Do you have a source for that?

                  Is it some niche thing or widespread?

            • cm0002@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              29
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Fuck yea, fuck Taxis

              An entire industry that’s playing the victim. People around here are romanticizing taxis, but the shit they pulled was just as bad, if not worse than what Uber does.

              Biggest difference is their drivers were complicit in the shenanigans and primarily targeted their customers. Taking LONG routes because their customer “wasn’t local”, saying a route will “probably be 10$” and then it’s 50 and “the meter says what it says man”.

              They literally used strict regulations as a shield to hold local monopolies for decades which resulted in terrible downright scammy service, cash only for an unacceptable amount of time, 0 innovations, dirty ancient barely running cars, a dispatch who would constantly say a car “was just around the corner” for 2 hours

              The taxi industry doesn’t give a fuck about you, they’re just mad because they didn’t think to do what Uber is doing and now they’re dying.

              Fuck Uber AND Taxis, they both can rot in hell, but I don’t mind seeing taxis get there first.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean that actually was one of the things that made them so great. Tracking, arrival timer and an easy app.

        Literally those being things that the taxi companies had to push to replicate is a good thing it’s a shame we had to give up the idea of properly funded labor and job protection to get it.

        • commandar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Tracking, arrival timer and an easy app.

          The fact that they would actually show up.

          Where I live, before Uber you needed to call the cab company at least an hour before you wanted to get anywhere (in a city that you can get pretty much anywhere in 15 minutes). The dispatcher would tell you someone will be there in 20 minutes and, if you were lucky, somebody might show up in 45. Before Uber, there was more than one occasion where I ended up stranded downtown until 4 or 5am after the bars had closed at 3:00.

          Being able to request a ride, having someone reliably show up, and show up reasonably close to when they said they would was an absolute game changer at the time.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The fact that they would actually show up.

            unless you see the uber car circling around you on the map, then canceling the ride and cashing in the “cancelation fee”

            The dispatcher would tell you someone will be there in 20 minutes and, if you were lucky, somebody might show up in 45. Before Uber, there was more than one occasion where I ended up stranded downtown until 4 or 5am after the bars had closed at 3:00.

            yeah, but this is not an invention of uber. it is just that we got the to point where technology allowed what was not possible before. yes, uber was faster to adapt it than traditional taxi industry, but they are not doing it for your blue eyes, they are doing it for profit and they do lot of shady stuff to achieve it.

            • commandar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              unless you see the uber car circling around you on the map, then canceling the ride and cashing in the “cancelation fee”

              That’s a relatively new phenomenon as people have learned how to game the system. The reliability of Uber when they first launched was complete night and day.

              yes, uber was faster to adapt it than traditional taxi industry, but they are not doing it for your blue eyes, they are doing it for profit and they do lot of shady stuff to achieve it.

              I never said otherwise. I was merely providing an example of why Uber gained adoption early on. The service was materially better than what taxi companies were delivering at the time in many places. I experienced that first hand.

              • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s a relatively new phenomenon

                that’s definitely going on for at least 5 years

                I was merely providing an example of why Uber gained adoption early on.

                ok, from that point of view it definitely makes sense

                • commandar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  that’s definitely going on for at least 5 years

                  Keyword: relatively.

                  Uber’s been around 15 years.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Which is both a good point and quite a different scenario from what’s being illustrated here which is just Uber’s version of a taxi stand, and literally the final brick in them going around taxi regulations.

            The problem was never when Uber provided something that wasn’t being provided, it was when they provided a regulation-free version (early on their drivers were wholly unvetted and many would be driving people around in cars with no commercial insurance and hence the Insurer could deny paying compensation to the passenger in the case of accident) of what was already in the Market by using the laws for Rental Cars With Drivers to avoid the laws for Taxis.

            Their business model from the start was just gaining an advantage against established players using Regulatory Avoidance, even if in some situations they did provide a better service rather than just an unregulated version (and hence cheaper because all kinds of costly rules done for the safety of customers weren’t obbeyed) of the same thing.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          we had to give up the idea of properly funded labor and job protection to get it.

          We didn’t have to, and we can always take it back.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The only reason I even started using Uber is because of taxi’s shitty dispatch system. All they had to do was write an app (or really some third party could have written it and then sold it to local cab companies) and they never would have been whining and complaining for years on end about how Uber turk der jerb.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        And a transparent price up front.

        It’s annoying enough to get in a vehicle and not know how much it’ll cost by the end of the trip (would you do this on a bus? Would you let an airline change the price of a ticket mid-flight?), but there’s something viscerally galling about watching some asshole take a longer route just to pad out the fare. Last I checked, when Lyft or Uber gives you a price, that’s the price.

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thinking about this… I wonder if the fediverse could be used for an “open source” app, to then hail and track a taxi in whatever area you’re in…

        Of course adoption would be the hardest part, but any taxi service could host their own server (even single driver operations) and anyone with an app that interfaces with the system could hail a taxi.

        Privacy would be difficult, as, inherently you need to somehow inform the taxi where you are and possibly who to expect. And anyone in the system could potentially monitor anyone else.

        I’d say that payments should be outright blocked from the system. Taxi should have to do that separately.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Once cabbies got their own apps, the only market advantage Uber had was lower costs because of not obbeying regulations, which wasn’t there in those contries which forced Uber to obbey the same regulations as cabbies.

        • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not entirely true.

          In some countries (UK, NZ) Uber has to give you the price of the journey up front. Whereas taxis are metered and do not.

          Uber UK has competition in thin regard with Minicabs, but the minicab apps are still shit.

          Capped costs for consumers is a competitive advantage over taxis, and Uber has managed to find the sweet spot between hailing a taxi, and booking a minicab.

          • deathbird@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Up front pricing is almost always going to be more attractive than metered pricing.

            If you offer me metered pricing, I’m going to assume you’ll charge 20% extra.

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think a lot of people also forget that taxis in San Francisco, which was basically the impetus forUber’s creation, were fucking horrible at the time. Things have changed a lot since then. But the one thing I will credit Uber with is making taxis functional again.

      One thing I distinctly remember from the times I was working out there was how terrified I was to be in their cars. There was absolutely no vetting of drivers, and Uber distinguished itself by doing that at the time (also pretty sure it required a higher level license, UberX came later which allowed basically anyone to drive).

      Let me be crystal clear here since I know folks are going to skim my comment and think I am an apologist for Uber and just go off: fuck Uber. They are a terrible company. If you really need to ride in a car, take a taxi.

    • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      People saw it, but if you remember Taxis before Uber it wasn’t exactly great either.

      No-shows, demanding flat rates double what the meter would charge/refusing service, various forms of harassment, etc.

      Turns out when there is very little competition, businesses treat their customers like shit.

      Uber definitely does some things better than traditional taxis. Things like work flexibility are great, but workers still need better protections and pay (aka, a union).

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most of the people I know in person that spoke highly of it when it first started up referred to it as an alternate to cabs because it was totally different. The fact that people still refer to it as ‘ride sharing’ is a sign that people do think it is something different than taxis.

        A lot of us saw it, but I don’t think the majority of people saw it.

  • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    A taxi that doesn’t play games with the meter, that always takes a credit card, and that has a rating system that harshly punishes drivers with bad attitudes.

    The problem with it is Uber’s cut.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would say lack of a union is a bigger problem. Most of what you say isn’t really true about taxis anymore, but even if it were, that doesn’t justify Uber fucking over its employees.

      • Skates@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        My city’s taxi system was completely changed by Uber, as were many parts of the country. So while it might not be true anymore, and taxi drivers with bad attitudes and those fudging the meter might have been mostly weeded out, it’s because of Uber that this happened. And it’s because of their unions that it hadn’t happened before. But the moment there started being some competition in town as opposed to their previous monopoly on the market, they had to back down if they wanted to even survive, let alone come out on top over Uber.

        So while yes, uber employees are being fucked over, that has less of an impact on things than you imply. I’ll still get an Uber/Bolt instead of a taxi 9/10 times, because immoral business practices are still better than immoral & illegal practices backed by a monopoly that you are powerless to change.

        • entropicshart@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Very much agree with this. I still remember coming out of the airport and thinking I’ll just grab a taxi instead of ordering a ride!

          • got shit from the taxi driver for not paying cash (and watched them use the old school paper carbon copy of my card),
          • listened to them grumble the whole time about how there was traffic,
          • got to ride in a car that had duct tape on the seat and no working AC
          • and experience a ride that made me wonder how long until they lost their license

          All this without any ability to give feedback or a rating to the driver.

          That was the last time I ever used a taxi.

        • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          5 months ago

          And I still haven’t seen any taxis yet that offered Uber’s transparency about trip cost before committing.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        This could also be solved with a little more competition tbh. The same system that allows Uber to exploit drivers lets them jump ship with literally zero effort

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          What we need is a p2p ridesharing that cuts out the corporate middleman. Ratings would have solved all the problems with taxis.

    • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Last time I tried a taxi was because and Uber or Lyft was going to take 20 minutes to get to us (waiting? Gross.) I’m close to the air port, 15 minute ride home. Uber or Lyft would have been $30. The taxi was going to cost me $140. For a 15 minute drive? Get fucked. Dude is driving for almost $600 an hour?

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Uber has variable pricing, whilst taxis do not (it’s the whole point of the meter, which is why shady types try to “play games” with it).

      Nowadays taxis will also take credit cards (I guess in some countries maybe some don’t).

      Agree on the superiority of having a rating system, though.

    • Deebster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      And a way to contact drivers if you’d just something in the car, and a system to notify others of your route and progress.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fuck Taxis and Uber

    An entire industry that’s playing the victim. Stop falling for it and stop romanticizing taxis, the shit they pulled was just as bad, if not worse than what Uber does.

    Biggest difference is their drivers were complicit in the shenanigans and primarily targeted their customers. Taking LONG routes because their customer “wasn’t local”, saying a route will “probably be 10$” and then it’s 50 and “the meter says what it says man”.

    They literally used strict regulations as a shield to hold local monopolies for decades which resulted in terrible downright scammy service, cash only for an unacceptable amount of time, 0 innovations, dirty ancient barely running cars, a dispatch who would constantly say a car “was just around the corner” for 2 hours

    The taxi industry doesn’t give a fuck about you, they’re just mad because they didn’t think to do what Uber is doing and now they’re dying. When/If Uber/Lyft dies, I guarantee the Taxi industry will resurge for the worst and take pages out of Ubers playbook. It’s just going to go back to the wait it was before.

    Fuck Uber AND Taxis, they both can rot in hell, but I don’t mind seeing taxis get there first.

    • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Dude, my driving instructor charged less than a Taxi and that guy was charging in the triple digits per hour, it is insane as to how Taxis are still in business. Who the hell pays those prices?

      • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t know but probably the same people that use the Uber Eats type services. Seriously, how are people affording to pay $25 for a $10 meal?

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          The ndo Uber Eats a few times a week at work. It’s 100% about the time required to do anything else.

          The average new house in the city I work for is about 6 million dollars, so I live about 90-minutes away in normal traffic where I can pay $750/month in rent. I work lots of hours (start at 8, usually leave between 6 and 8 with no real break between), so I’m looking at 14-16 hours between when I leave the house in the morning and when I return home. I also think ach night classes at the University on Mondays during the fall and Spring semesters, and have 3 night meetings a month between Council and Planning and Zoning. On the weekends I drive a couple hundred miles out of town to help with my parents.

          If paying triple for a meal occasionally saves me 15-20 minutes it’s often absolutely worth it for the stress relief.

          • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Damn dude, I don’t know how you do all that! In any case I was just wondering more how people can afford to spend triple like… every day. Assuming one $30 delivered meal every day in a 30 day month, that’s $900 a month!

            • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              $900 a month is quite affordable compared to hiring a private chef. It’s all relative.

              I’m cheap af, but that doesn’t make me ‘right’. If I made $1000/h or something it would make complete sense to pay $30 for a $10 meal each day if it saved me even just 15 minutes of effort that could be put towards working instead. In that case, I’d argue it would be ‘wrong’ and wasteful economically not to use the service.

              • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah true. I guess these people I see ordering it all the time must be doing pretty well for themselves, especially considering how much the rents at my apartment complex are 😅

    • plantedworld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Once took a taxi downtown with my family when we were in a different city, and the drive home was twice as much as the drive there (second driver took a different route). My dad challenged him on it and he backed down an accepted the same fare as the first driver.

      Same company, same rates, just a dbag driver

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The taxi industry hates you and buffalo buffalo buffalo Ubers main competative advantage is just breaking the law. Everyone sucks.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo is upstate New York for “yada yada yada”

          It’s a dismissive. Meant to say “everything you said is basically the same as the first thing you said.”

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        main competative advantage is just breaking the law

        If you’re talking employment law, then yea for sure

        If you’re taking laws like those that cap taxis licenses arbitrarily that the Taxi industry pushed for so that bigger companies could buy them all up and establish a monopoly, then I can look the other way on those

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      they’re just mad because they didn’t think to do what Uber is doing and now they’re dying.

      That and they’re mad because their virtual monopoly status didn’t protect them from market disruption. They just sat back, assuming that there was no way these rogue taxi services were going to evade the law for long. The fact that an entire industry acted on such a bad take suggests, to me, a lot of anti-competitive bullshit behind the scenes.

      Anyway, I agree. All they had to do was either add rideshare-like features to their service, merge with rideshare services, or become one themselves. The investment capital was clearly there, and making a modernization pitch with brand recognition of an established taxi company would have been a slam-dunk.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not sure if anyone else here has mentioned this… At least up until Uber/Lyft came out, taxis were suuuuper racist. It was really hard for black men to hail taxis.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m a brown dude. I have so many stories about bad taxi experiences. From Taxi drivers refusing to pick me up, to them going, “You’re lucky to be in my car”, to “I’m not driving there. Get out.”

      Around 2017 and was very upset at Uber, I took a taxi from the airport. The guy refused to drive until we had more people in the car. I said this wasn’t a car share, and he told me to go take a bus. When I started getting a Uber, he apologized and took me, but then bitched about it the whole drive that he was losing money.

      Uber and Lyft changed it all.

      Cleaner cars. No attitudes. Agreed upon destination and fair.

      I have no sympathy for taxis.

      • PopShark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thanks for sharing your experience even though I know it can’t feel good typing it all out.

    • TrueMonoxidist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      5 months ago

      Was looking for this comment. Racism was extremely pervasive in certain areas.

      The biggest reason Uber and Lyft took off is cabs sucked for the most part. Uber and Lyft aren’t great either, but people forget how bad Taxis were at that time.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      In every single way Ubers are more convenient than a taxi. It’s amazing to me that taxi companies can’t see all the little improvements that going by Uber brings.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          5 months ago

          100% agreed. I’m not condoning Uber. I’m saying taxi companies should be better at copying the convenience of Uber.

          • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            5 months ago

            About 10 years a go I missed two flights for work because the taxi I had scheduled in advance never showed, and when I called dispatch they said 'he found a better fair, he’s allowed to do that’s

            When I explained this to my neighbor who drove cabs be was still angry with me for switching to Lyft, but also agreed with the dispatch. Cabs don’t want to change, which sucks because I wish there was more competition

          • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I guess it depends where you are. In my city there is a taxi company that started buying lots of smaller ones. They now have an app like Uber so you can order it and see where it is. Because they bought so many firms they’re everywhere and considerably cheaper than Uber. I guess it’s only viable in large cities.

            • Chetzemoka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Only took the cab companies ten years to catch on to what they should have done as soon as Uber came on the scene. If cab companies had innovated like this, they would have killed Uber in the cradle.

              • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s a lot harder for smaller businesses to invest in that level of development without hedge fund money and trying to corner the market.

                If a small taxi company is making £100k profit a year it’s a big ask to invest £20k+ on developer to compete with Uber for what? A small increase in profit.

                You need to expand as well as innovate. Hence the one taxi company near me buying out others to have a larger market.

                • Chetzemoka@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Multiple companies could have pooled resources to fund developing an app that they all used. They have existing inventory, employees, local government connections. They definitely could have outcompeted Uber if they had been able to get their heads out of their asses and even try.

                  Instead they ignorantly tried to kill Uber by suppressing innovation and service improvements that everyone wanted, which was doomed to fail from the start. They dug their own graves on this one.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sure, Uber brought competition. But in certain places they got banned and the local taxi authority greatly improved on the service, learning from the gig apps’ offerings.

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      Back in the day Opie and Anthony tested this.

      Patrice o Neal with a gold chain vs Anthony cumia in a nazi helmet

      Cumia got more cabs.

        • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh yeah he was probably thrilled lol.

          I still see his senility show pop up in my feed occasionally. Would unsub but not sure I’ll find out he’s dead otherwise lol

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      And also super expensive. I’ve had times where it was half the price to rent a car for the day than to get one taxi from the airport.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I remember one time, in Boston, I (white dude) was downstream of a black guy.

      Cabbie went right by the black guy and stopped for me.

      Black guy came running up and slashed his tire and then ran off.

      I was like “cabby deserved it, but at the same time black guy justified it.”

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not really a justified decision if it was the wrong one. The cabbie got his tires slashed by being a dickhead. If he’d have not been a racist, he would’ve had no problems. This is like the guy in the meme who puts a metal pole in his bike spokes. Cabbie caused his own problems.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Justifying is the wrong word to use but I understood what they meant. But you have to think about it in isolation for it to make sense, and because you have to i don’t think it’s very helpful to the discourse

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The big difference here is that I know the cost. Getting into a cab it was always kind of blind, and a cab driver definitely tried to screw me one time by driving in circles (we were very drunk, and I noticed at some point we hadn’t made it very far, so I started paying attention and it was clear pretty quickly that he had circled back almost to where he had picked us up).

    Also when I lived out in Queens, cabs rarely came out there. I had to hike all the way to Queens Blvd to have a chance, and even then they would barely stop at night. Would often get told to “get out” when asking for them to take me back to Queens. I’ve even been able to get a Uber out almost out in the middle of nowhere in the middle of the night.

    Lyft/Uber definitely has their problems, but cabs weren’t some shining beacon on the hill.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Uber can drive in circles and up your fare too… They have per ride, mile, and minute fare just like taxis. The coverage thing is just a problem with New York’s medallion system. But also, speaking from experience, rideshare drivers can and will refuse rides into places they don’t want to go. The difference is you’re talking with dispatch instead of a single driver so they get replaced without you knowing anything. Traditional taxi companies also have a dispatcher you can call and they will handle the recalcitrant drivers, but they may also negotiate a dead head fee.

      But guess what? Uber and Lyft build dead heading directly into their fee structure. If you go out of the zone you pay an extra fee so the driver isn’t completely out of luck making money.

      Uber and Lyft really are just digital dispatchers for privately run taxis.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That wasn’t true in the beginning, they did that because drivers were refusing rides. And drivers still try to conflate the expected fare with distance and even cancel rides after seeing the destination. Yes they can get removed if they do that too much but that doesn’t stop it from happening.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve taken hundreds of ubers and it’s always been within cents of the price I was quoted. I’ve taken hundreds of cab rides and only a handful of times was in given a price before hand.

        I think it’s fair to say I know the price when it comes to an Uber and even if they can drive around to raise the price, it’s going to be obvious.

        And on that note, at an airport near me there is a close by convenience store and if the Uber doesn’t want to take the fair, it’s know they will sit in there and wait for the customer to cancel it so they don’t get the hit. I’ve had it happen to me, contacted uber, and they gave me a discount on my next ride. I’m sure they don’t want to give away money, so I assume they are dealing with the driver at that point.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          And I’ve had hundreds of cab rides that were just fine, and the fare was exactly what I expected. You cannot come in here comparing the excesses of one system against the normal usage of the other system and not get called on it.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            “what I expected” please expand. Other than maybe having done the trip before a number of times (which would account for a tiny fraction of the rides I took), and even then time of day would affect the price, I really had very little idea what the ride would cost, especially if we’re talking within cents.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’ve never had surge pricing in cabs. And yeah trips around your own town that would have been done multiple times.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I dunno about you guys, but using a rideshare app, I’ve been canceled on numerous times, by multiple drivers. Often at the last minute, when maybe he app thinks they’re taking too long to reach me? I had a driver I was watching get closer and closer to me, and when they were around the corner the app changed my driver to someone a couple miles away. That shit didn’t happen with taxis because we weren’t reliant on some shitty algorithm that is only coldly making the most rides happen per minute to get higher margins for the company.

        There are definitely drawbacks to the old school cab system, but I don’t like the app system. Sure, the meter would go up as you drive and sometimes you’d have to have an idea of where you’re going to not get screwed by a dishonest driver, but the app also randomly charges way more for the same ride depending on the app’s fuckin mood.

        Crazy what we’ve let private companies do just because they marginally made our lives somewhat more convenient (on the surface).

    • scottywh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 months ago

      The trick is you have to pretend that you’re actually a “tech company” to avoid all the regulations that apply to companies that are honest about what business they’re in.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m actually reminded of the time James Randi refused to debunk some tech bro’s astrology app, despite him being gung ho about how well it worked… With the reason Randi gave being that because it was an app and claimed to have math behind it, it was too close to the realm of science to count as anything supernatural… Even though there’s virtually no difference between this and a horoscope in the paper, but he was fooled by there being a phone involved. So the guy DID NOT get debunked or even tested despite being full of shit he was, he didn’t get tested or in the running for the million, but he got Randi’s seal of approval… That’s a task failed successfully moment right there.

            God JREF’s reputation is so overblown.

            Remember: You are not immune to propaganda, you will accept anything if it’s presented in a way that seems plausible yet magical enough to you.

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pretending is easy. Make an app for phones. Always talk in tech buzz words.

        We’re not a hotel company. We’re a company that leverages internet connectivity to connect potential customers with needed accommodation. We’re creating our own AI to boost…mumbles with more tech buzzwords.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I keep hearing like they didn’t really do shit. When Uber did a fuckton.

      1 - Reputation. If a taxi driver was a racist POS, literally nothing I can do.

      2 - Agreed upon fare. You literally see a estimate of the cost. I had a taxi add extra fees the moment I sat in the car.

      3 - GPS. The route on your phone is the same route they follow. How many times have taxis went on a fucking joyride to rank up more money?

      4 - See when the ride is coming. “Cab will be there in 15-45 mins.” Never fucking shows up.

      5 - Automatic payment. How many fucking CC machines didn’t work so they forced you to pay cash?

      I can go on and on.

      But to say some tech bro slapped some tech jargon onto taxis and became rich is disingenuous to all the innovations they’ve done to unfuck the taxi industry.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Except taxis take cash and don’t track your trips in an irreovacble database. I’ll take anonymous transport whenever it’s a reasonable option.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          if you have your gps on in your pocket, what difference does it make whether Uber/Lyft is tracking you or Google/Apple?

          assuming of course you are looking at your map, which is either google maps, waze or apple maps

          • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can run GPS w/out a cell signal. GPS is not tracking you. Also, it’s more of just a question of premise. I’ve taken a lot of cabs and never had this issue and it’s hard to imagine them thinking they will get away with driving shenanigans in the modern era. Has this happened to you or just an old boomer tale?

            • kameecoding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Taxis literally refused to take us after arriving in Budapest because we speak Hungarian and one of us studied there so had the Budapest accent too and everyone of them was all of a sudden busy and waiting for someone (they were literally just standing around smoking)

              The original commenter was complaining about privacy issues with ridesharing apps, so I am not sure what cell signal has to do with anything? Having gps on is literally useless unless you check your google maps or waze or something that you are not taken on a ride around and all of those track you so have the same privacy issues as alluded to by the original commenter I don’t think I can make my point any clearer.

              Also if you think this doesn’t happen in less developed countries then you are extremely naive.

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Where the fuck are you going, or what are you doing, to where you don’t want your taxi trips tracked?

      I understand privacy and stuff, but sometimes people take it and “muh freedoms” way too seriously overboard.

      • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can’t imagine famous people, federal investigators, Union organisers, protected witnesses, or literally anybody else that wouldn’t want their movements trackable by a company or anybody that company gets hacked by?

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          Of course I can, did you even read my comment?

          I understand privacy and stuff, but sometimes people take it and “muh freedoms” way too seriously overboard.

          I never said there might not be legitimate reasons to avoid tracking. I’m saying sometimes it’s taken too seriously to the point of silliness and forgoing convenience for the sake of “I don’t want the gub’ment tracking me” freedom nonsense. There will be times when it makes sense, there will be times when it’s just silly.

          • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s not how privacy works though. You either have it when you don’t need it or don’t have it when you need it. You don’t just get it when you need it.

            It’s not silliness to presume that you could eventually be in some situation where you need a high amount of privacy.

            Maybe if you don’t actually participate in society, there’s some life circumstances that mean you would never need privacy. There’s probably like a hundred people alive like that. I don’t think they take taxis.

  • duffman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    5 months ago

    A few times as a kid I had to take a taxi alone. I knew the way home, but the driver decided to make a lot of unnecessary turns and go this round about way to run up the fair. I was probably in 3rd grade and knew what he was doing but didn’t have the guts to call him out.

        • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Wait what?

          Your culture doesn’t tip taxi drivers?

          I constantly felt like if I didn’t tip the taxi driver, he’d drive in reverse and tell me to fuck off. Because yes they were that kind of asshole.

        • tmyakal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They are usually self-employed

          That varies wildly depending on city, county, state, and (I’m guessing) country requirements. I drove for a few years in a small-ish city, and neither me nor anyone I ran into at the usual spots were self-employed. We all worked for one of two cab companies, making hourly wages plus tip.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ha ha this happened when I took a taxi to the railway station, leaving Paris after 10 years. It was quite nice to get the “tourist” route early in the morning so I rolled with it :-)

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Uber effectively weaseled their way into the taxi industry by somehow enticing drivers to work for them while also assuming all of the liabilities. Truly, capitalism at its finest.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m kinda surprised that insurance companies haven’t offered to buy driver information from these types of companies so they can raise rates

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh they most definitely do. I briefly worked at a company that sold data to car flippers and we for sure knew if any particular car was ever used as a taxi or not. Even if we didn’t buy this data off taxi company directly, we could easily determine it by seeing unusually high mileage between services and checkups. And we definitely know the identity of the driver, so it’s just a matter of putting 2+2 together.

  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Taxi drivers in my city also have something else Uber drivers don’t- a licence that was bought decades ago and is limited to a certain number, they never expire and can be bought and sold between private parties and you end up with one asshole who owns a bunch and rents out the licenced car to drivers who pay him a rent. It’s a pretty hardcore mafia and predates on immigrants.

    They are also fucking maniacs who almost kill people every day with their reckless driving, but Ubers do that too.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      To the immigrant thing - I was on vacation a few weeks ago and took five Uber rides. None of the drivers spoke English. I wonder if ride sharing is going the immigrant predator route these days.

      For clarification, it didn’t bother me to have non-English speaking drivers. They were all great.

      • Leviathan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh yeah, I don’t think either are great, but at least Uber didn’t require drivers to submit to some crazy legal Ponzi scheme while paying for special driver’s licenses and competing with other drivers for the good shifts on a shared taxi licence. The Taxi mafia lobbied my city pretty hard and now Ubers get the opportunity to lose money to a middle man too! I’ve seen a bunch of taxis straight up also driving for Uber throughout the city.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same in France. They had huge protests years ago to ban Uber, because they didn’t want competition making it harder to pay for their license.

      Motherfucker, who lobbied to limit the number of licenses in the first place?

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s Uber propaganda. The system was created because prior to that cities had traffic jams with a ton of freelance cabs with no quality controls or regulation. The medallion system set a price floor and mandated inspections and insurance and background checks. Uber bypassed all of that for years and surprise; women were being assaulted by drivers with criminal history, passengers were injured from uninspected vehicles and couldn’t get remedied because the drivers were uninsured, and cities have worsening traffic jams because there was no limit on Uber drivers choking downtown streets.

      The taxi industry evolved this way for good reasons. Uber was initially sold as good for immigrants and now immigrants protest how that company gets special treatment over every other cab company and hurts their bottom line.

    • Xerø@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yet I value those licenses and medallions more than any rideshare contract.

      • Leviathan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I drive a delivery truck around the city for a living and watch taxis “drive” all day, I wouldn’t piss on them if they were in fire I don’t value them.

  • Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    But now you can’t just tell the driver where to go and give him cash, you have to use the app first and you are out of luck if you phone battery is dead. So technology makes the experience activly worse in this case.

    • SuperApples@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been overcharged/“taken for a ride” by five or so taxis in my life, never had trouble with a ride-share service, even in countries where they are operating illegally. Never had a clearly drunk driver, too, unlike a couple of taxis I’ve taken.

      When there’s any kind of language barrier, choosing the destination in the app rather than trying to speak it is so much easier, and using in-app translation messaging, too. When arriving in a new country, not having to get money out at the airport (avoiding rip-off ATMs or money exchangers) and being able to pay online is so much better than cash, especially when you’re not familiar with the currency.

      Certainty of price, and ability to give instant feedback are great at keeping things honest. Sure, Uber/Grab etc are terrible companies, but I swear most taxi licenses in the world are owned my organized crime, so not much of an alternative. There is so much that needs to be done with regulation to get rid of the ‘gig economy’ and make sure that drivers are properly compensated/employed, but the app-powered ride service is just so superior in every way for the passenger, in my opinion.

      May I suggest a back-up battery for your phone (I just use my laptop USB as it’s always with me and works when the PC is off).

    • WanderingCat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They have machines in the door which have the app there for public use for exactly that reason

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah but it’s cheaper than a taxi, and the best part is that you don’t have to interact with a human, which means you don’t have to tip (if you book a self-driving car). Furthermore, if you practice good charging habits, you never have to worry about a dead phone.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Then don’t use Uber. Like I said, self-driving cabs are best. No route fuckery to run up the meter, because they always take the most efficient path. I am aware that not every city has these yet, but that’ll change within a few years.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Short answer: America.
          Long Answer: Because American companies are so greedy that they won’t even pay a livable wage; they expect working class citizens to pick up the slack with tips in every industry they can get away with doing such a thing. All thanks to the policies of a long dead president from the 80s (Reagan), that were never rolled back. In other words: America.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Name a more iconic duo.

      Tech bros and inventing something superfluous that nobody asked for that will literally bring misery, suffering and death.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thinking Uber is worse than taxis shows how little people remember about how bad they really were.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        They aren’t thinking. They are looking for things to whine about to justify their failed existence.

        Sour grapes, resentment, call it what you want. Easier to devalue the success of others vs achieve something of your own.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    Techbro has an app for 5,000 year old thing: “wow this is so novel and innovative!”

  • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Way back in 2009 or so… my uber/taxi story. So I land in Newark, NJ and try to catch a cab and it’s $50 to go to the hotel on the other side of airport because we traverse 3 zones (and they charged by zone). Uber was $11. See, when Uber came out it was like a gamified systems and almost always cheaper. Drivers were getting crazy perks too, i swear one guy in seattle said he was banking north of 2k a day just back and forth to the airport. This was the only time in Uber’s history where a normal human could grind and make a nice pay with some added personal risk. I was all for it because in cities like Newark, unions control the politics and the average traveler (in this case, me) gets screwed in the name of “fairness”.

    Unions are great, but not when they use that same political power to squeeze regular people for profits by controlling the pricing and forcing zones. I understand why they said they put that in place (fair competition), but in this case we all know it’s about profits first, better working for taxi drivers, second. Does that mean i love uber now? Hell no, they need a union (yep, i agree), but uber broke a broken system and made taxi companies be competitive. I can now open up several apps and see which is cheaper and choose accordingly (and these last 2 years it’s been cabs).