• southerntofu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      No matter what i think of a specific Nation-State, i think separatism should always be supported uncritically. That’s like Consent 101. In the name of what would you impose on people to be part of something they don’t want to be part of?!

      Who cares if it’s China? In France many people aim for autonomy, too, in the colonized regions from Guadeloupe to Corse or Bretagne/Kanaky. If you pretend to support freedom for people/communities, then you should probably support these anti-colonial struggles too.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        That’s a really naive view of the world. A small place like Hong Kong is never going to be independent in practice. So, it’s not a question of whether they’re independent from China, but rather whether they’re going to be under Chinese or western influence.

        Meanwhile, it’s also absurd to homogenize people. The reality is that majority of people in HK aren’t exactly against China. There is also a long documented history of US being involved in the drive for separatism.

        • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          Depends what you call “independant”. Of course they’re not gonna be 100% resource-sufficient and that’s OK. But why would you have to choose under whose umbrella to hide? Can’t an independent nation conduct partnership and trade with “both” sides (or more)? I mean if in your view humanity requires choosing a side between different colonial Empires, i’d rather not live in this world.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            I’m talking about politics. Most countries in the world have to deal with US in terms of funding politicians, spreading propaganda in the media, and economic coercion. Ultimately, when US doesn’t get what it wants then they will fund protests, civil unrest, death squads, and coups in your country. Many books have been written on this subject. The Jakarta Method is a very good read on what happens to countries that try to be independent.

            There is no such animal as an independent nation in the real world that we live in. Whether you choose to engage with reality or not is of course your choice.

            edit: spelling

            • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              There’s a few semi-independent nations, although i agree colonial sabotage and psyops is definitely a thing. Whether you choose to continue with this imperialist status quo or not is of course your choice.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 years ago

                All nations fall under some larger umbrella in practice. Meanwhile, whether large nations are going act the way they act is not my choice at all actually. The only choice an individual has is to engage with the facts.

                • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  OK so if we agree there’s some things we’re powerless in regards to, can we agree we should live our lives regardless of their positions and not try to accommodate their tyrannical desires in the name of defending the lesser evil?

        • poVoq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          I think the argument was rather that even if separatism would lead to objectively worse outcomes, forcing someone to stay together as one country would still be (morally) wrong.

          And it is highly questionable if it leads to objectively worse outcomes at least when cooperation is still possible. The problem is usually that one side tries to force the issue and that leads to bitterness on both sides and thus cooperation becomes impossible.

            • poVoq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Borders are arbitrary. People might as well say the best outcome would be a capitalist world government. So those separatist Chinese that insist on having their own flavor of Capitalism should really just think more of the prosperity of the people ( /s obviously).

              In the end the prosperity of the people does indeed matter more, but arbitrary lines on a map only become an issue for that when people make them so. There is nothing inherently problematic in having decentralized means of administration under different flags as long as everyone cooperates.

        • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Separatism is not exactly a good thing

          I think the misunderstanding comes from what the word means. Some people use it to designate the rule of someone else, as in the examples you mentioned. I personally advocate for autonomy (decentralized power) which also fits under that umbrella.

          So yes, context matters. But consent matters even more so. I never consented to live under the rule of the French Empire and every day of my life i suffer due to that. The same is true with many people. In the name of what would you refuse us the right to build our own autonomous commune as is illegal by French law?

            • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              Reasoning with those in power does not work: those from the ZAD who tried to negotiate with the State ended up betraying/destroying the ZAD (it’s now all legalized and mostly populated by hipsters and bourgeois). Going all guerilla warfare on your government is a valid strategy, but arguably modern empires have become too resilient for that to work. Mounting a legal political party for your cause seems useless: even a formally-elected government like in Catalonia will get repressed by the State for trying to separate.

              Yeah there’s a lot we can do and i guess both of us are involved in various projects AFK, but still when you boil it down to personal/communal consent, Nation States are always the enemy of the people.

                • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  I’m not morally opposed to “work from within” as long as you don’t become corrupted. I just don’t know of a single example of this strategy working to produce any significant change, but i do know many examples of people betraying their cause due to working within the system.

      • ndarwincorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        In this case, your uncritical support for separatism is indistinguishable from uncritical support for Anglo colonialism.

        Uncritical support for repatriation from settler colonists and their collaborators.

        • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          “In this case, your uncritical support for refusing sex is indistinguishable from uncritical support of rape”

          Do you realize how horrible what you’re saying is? If my community doesn’t want to be part of your colonial Empire, just kill us already but don’t pretend we have a moral obligation to live by your rules.

          • ndarwincorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            Do you realize pee pee poo poo?

            The colonizers in this case are Anglo. You’re participating in an anglophone forum. Idgaf what you have to say about colonial empires.

            • southerntofu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              So what? Did you read me defending western Empires? No. But i do read you defending the Chinese empire, and that worries me. If you want to build communism, the first step is to abolish all Nation States for they are bourgeois constructs controlling the people.

    • th0mcat@talk.thomcat.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m confused. Are you downplaying what happened? Or stating that it never happened? Or that it happened, but the US has twisted/lied about what happened?

    • iagev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Are they really that weak that they cannot abide these things?

    • plu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Many people protesting @ Tiananmen Square were Maoists…

        • plu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s insane being an actually real-life organized socialist with natural contacts to the communist opposition in China, and then looking in the online world to see teenagers stanning the PRC because it has a red flag.

    • Jedrax@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Congrats, no one will every take anything you say seriously on this platform again. I think I should start a list of communist/Chinese apologists on this platform and keep it public.

      Edit: Propagandists

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        For someone with (seemingly) Western values, you sure are against people having different opinions than you

        I mean look, I even had a community on Lemmy.ml banned (/c/IsTaiwanACountry) because of its moderate anti-CCP stance and enough people complained. While that’s obviously BS on behalf of the Lemmy admins, it doesn’t immediately discredit everyone who got the community banned