• poVoq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I think the argument was rather that even if separatism would lead to objectively worse outcomes, forcing someone to stay together as one country would still be (morally) wrong.

    And it is highly questionable if it leads to objectively worse outcomes at least when cooperation is still possible. The problem is usually that one side tries to force the issue and that leads to bitterness on both sides and thus cooperation becomes impossible.

      • poVoq@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Borders are arbitrary. People might as well say the best outcome would be a capitalist world government. So those separatist Chinese that insist on having their own flavor of Capitalism should really just think more of the prosperity of the people ( /s obviously).

        In the end the prosperity of the people does indeed matter more, but arbitrary lines on a map only become an issue for that when people make them so. There is nothing inherently problematic in having decentralized means of administration under different flags as long as everyone cooperates.