• dlpkl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s textbook genocide. They’ve seen they can get away with anything under the guise of war, so why not just solve all their issues and make sure no one’s alive to return to their homes?

    • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      under the guise of war

      There’s no guise. This is the way war has been prosecuted for millennia. The Geneva Convention, UNHRC, etc. are blips. War is genocide and always has been. Only in the late modern to post-modern era has war been something other than the complete annihilation of your enemies and their culture, including all the infanticide and rape that implies. If you’re, for instance, the US prosecuting a war for nebulous geopolitical reasons, then you can slap up a veneer of rules and conduct. If it’s a war of territorial expansion, on the other hand, you’d better be prepared to do what it takes to stamp out any trace of the people who originally lived there, or at least leave those who remain so broken and disempowered that they’ll never pose a threat.

      Expect more like Ukraine & Palestine as the US’s grip on hegemony slips, and as we continue to slowly forget the lessons of the World Wars.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not quite true. While there were many wars of cultural genocide, (culture is a great control tool), wars of physical genocide were largely reserved for religious wars and punishment wars. Not gonna pay that tithe or surrender the second you see us? Congratulations, you’re an example. Espouse a different religious truth? You’re a threat that must be made an example.

        For the most part they understood the value of human capital and didn’t want to destroy it if they didn’t have to.

      • ferralcat@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is not true. There are hundreds of cultures around today who were conquered and just left to live until their conquerors eventually moved out. The Jews themselves have literally been conquered a dozen times.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have one of Mahmoud Darwish’s books right here, goes into pretty significant detail about Israel’s attempts to stamp out Palestinian culture in the earliest years:

        https://blogs.transparent.com/arabic/write-down-i-am-an-arab/

        https://www.wrmea.org/2017-november-december/id-card-by-mahmoud-darwish-a-translation-and-commentary.html

        As the book details, he wrote this and then performed it on a stage in Israel, to their outrage, I think it said around 1958.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I admit, I’ve been skeptical of this for a while because I couldn’t think of a reason why they’d want to do this.

      And I realized today. There doesn’t have to be some grand reason. Killing them all ensures Hamas is killed too. They’ll destroy Palestine because it’s easier and safer for them to indiscriminately bomb the place. That’s reason enough. :/

      • ferralcat@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it won’t kill hamas. It’ll just breed more of them living in all the countries surrounding Israel.