Some people, communicating via satellite phones, have described the attack as the “heaviest bombardment yet,” according to independent journalist Sharif Kouddous.

“People can’t call ambulances or civil defense. We are being bombed in an unprecedented manner,” said an unidentified journalist at a Gaza hospital, according to a translation by The Nation’s Palestinian correspondent, Mohammed El-Kurd. “The sky around us just lights up [with explosions], and no one knows what’s going on.”

    • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      the world has never truly been at peace though - maybe prior to the evolution of bacteria, but I doubt it.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The natural world is chaotic and violent, so that means we as thinking humans who know what it is to suffer pain and the loss of loved ones, must not only add to that violence and chaos but also devise new, sophisticated ways of inflicting suffering. But also don’t forget that we’re better and more civilized than animals. /s

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Until I experienced violence myself, I was unwilling to process the logic or think it through. Then I lived a portion of my life where I was in physical danger from very bad people, and I was forced to think it through.

          Being prepared to retaliate is the most effective defense against those who are not sympathetic to your needs, whom you cannot avoid. It’s why animals demo their weapons when cornered. It’s why plants “waste” energy producing toxins that harm would-be eaters.

          Every organism has weapons, and evolution’s been optimizing for over a billion years. Like, a little flap of skin no longer used is selected out over the course of a million years because it provides a disadvantage against those not wasting the energy to grow the little flap of skin. But nature spends energy putting claws on kittens. Why?

          It’s logical; it’s just ugly and unpleasant to acknowledge. The only time people acknowledge it is when their circumstances change such that not acknowledging it is worse. ie when they are faced with the necessity of dealing with violence.

          • 257m@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, bombing children is simply the way the world works. Nothing we can do to stop genocide I guess. /s

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh thank god it is so good to see someone who understands.

        Cease-fire is the best we’ve got. MAD is why small animals have the instinct to fight bigger animals. It’s why pufferfish exist. Nature, unconsciously, groks deterrence and programs it into 100% of her evolved organisms.

      • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Segments of the population have had peace, often on the back of oppression. “No justice, no peace” vows to make the peace as expensive as the profits of oppression, so that justice becomes economical.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This speaks to your warped sense of what justice really is, and I pity those around you for how that must affect them as you go through life bleeding your vindictiveness onto others.

        The problem with those who are both shameless and arrogant is that they lack the self-awareness and empathy to put themselves in the shoes of others. May the universe show you the same level of mercy that you seem inclined to grant to others…

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a dog bit a person and that person went to the pound and just kicked all the dogs, is sort of what you’re cheering for

    • dumdum666@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What exactly is justice in context of a war? And do you realize that absolute justice for all sides means that the war will never end?

        • dumdum666@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          There can’t be „justice“ for things from the past. Everyone has to heal and make amends. You have to look into the future, so both sides learn to coexist.

          Worked for France and Germany and Worked for the IRA and the UK. Conflicts that lasted centuries (France/Germany) and decades (IRA/UK) were able to get resolved.

          • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you also agree that Israel should immediately cease the siege of Gaza and look toward a diplomatic solution that aims to heal both parties loss. Perhaps a brokered peace and lasting agreement by a neutral 3rd party to finally solve all disputes? I think that’s a wonderful idea.

            • dumdum666@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              While Hamas ceases fire and releases all hostages unconditionally at the same time of course. sounds like a splendid idea.

              • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I believe that’s on the table

                Speaking at the United Nations, Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said that Hamas is ready to release hostages on the condition that 6,000 Palestinians, who are currently in Israeli jails, are released as well.
                “According to our negotiations, Hamas is ready to release civilian prisoners. On the other hand, the world should support the release of 6,000 Palestinians held in Israeli prisons,” he told a meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the Middle East on Thursday.

                Probably not the preferred outcome, but it stops the killing now

                • dumdum666@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s not an unconditional release of the hostages - so it’s very unlikely to happen.

              • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your right, better to just keep bombing. I meant it more as the neutral party decides but both sides agree up front to abide by the terms of the agreement and have no say in how that neutral party decides. Perhaps protection guarantees are made and loss of claims imposed on any further hostilities?

                • burchalka@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The UNIFIL (neutral peace keeping force) exists in Lebanon since 1978 - and didn’t prevent Hezbollah from becoming the most capable non-government actor in the region, which launches AT missiles on Israeli northern border every single day. Tell us more about neutral parties…

          • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You say this like there’s never been an attempt at resolving the apartheid state of Israel. There have been many attempts at diplomatic solutions. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu himself has done everything he can to prevent any kind of diplomatic solution from ever happening.

        • Redrum714@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you dont want genocided don’t try and genocide your neighbor. Pretty simple concept really

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is errors in justice that make wars grow.

        An excellent example of an error in justice is killing the people next to the people who attacked you. This conflict continues because there’s no clean line connecting an attacker to the retaliation back against that attacker.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What exactly is justice in context of a war?

        Whoever wins.

        The war will end when there are no sides left.

        Which is… either when everyone decides to put their differences aside… or when the last man standing finally dies, all tales get forgotten, and all written records destroyed, so nobody can ever pick any of the sides again. They’ll likely pick a different set of sides again, but that will be a different war 🤷

    • qnick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s interesting considering that Hamas is one of the closest allies of the Kremlin.

      • Why9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        103
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know as well as anyone that this has NOTHING to do with Hamas.

        Their strategy of indiscriminate bombing would not be the answer if they wanted to kill Hamas only. There’s absolutely no regard for civilians here. They’re not destroying Hamas. They’re eradicating the population of Palestine. Anyone who lives will rightly join Hamas and after this, honestly I can see why.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            29
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hamas as an organization will no longer exist. The Israeli government has been exceptionally and adamantly clear about that

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I wish the US could’ve penned the Taliban in the way Hamas is penned in.

                Man what an absolute slam dunk no-downsides thing that would have been.

                Does this mean you strongly support this action, since these groups are roughly equal?

          • Why9@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You seem to be confused. I’ll help you understand. It’s a matter of perspective:

            For Israel, this ‘invasion’ has nothing to do with Hamas. They were just waiting for a reason to seize more land, and this was the perfect opportunity to get the international community behind them. War crime upon war crime under the pretext of defense. Calls for a ceasefire will be ignored because this is their best chance in decades to take a sizeable chunk of Gaza.

            For Hamas, the constant, near century-long murdering of innocent men, women and children is causing the survivors of those attacks to take up arms in anger and fight back. They’re not getting a proper education. A Palestinian child born in the early 2000s has already survived 5 wars by now. Hamas is their only vocation. Yes, they’re terrorists to us (sitting in our armchairs and engaging in backseat politics from the comfort of our homes), but not to the Palestinian people who seem to be “shielding” them. No one in Palestine is blind to the real terrorists, i.e. Israel.

            This is a land grab pure and simple, and Israel is prepared to dig deep.

              • Why9@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                but you meant that Israel’s real purpose for invading Gaza is not to stomp out Hamas.

                I mean, kind of?

                The ultimate goal is to have all of Palestine become Israel, and have no more Palestinians live here - have them die, resettle in Egypt, or have other Arabian or European nations take in the refugees. They don’t want Palestinians sharing the land, when in reality the Palestinians were forced to share their land with Israel. After this they would have a complete patch of land (formerly the whole of Palestine) belong entirely to them. That’s the goal.

                Hamas is Netenyahu’s greatest gift from Palestine. If Palestine never retaliated, no one would ever be able to justify Israel’s terrorism (raiding innocent settlements, evicting people who have lived there for 10+ generations, saying “well if I don’t steal your home, someone else will”). With Hamas as a retaliatory force, they’ve been able to convince the world through incendiary and dehumanising language that Hamas are terrorists. IDF’s recent actions have been deemed “acceptable” by the world because they are retaliating and defending themselves from a Hamas attack, not taking into account that the Hamas attack itself was a retaliation for years upon years of Israeli attacks.

                When Hamas retaliates, they can use this brand of excessive force, where they bomb entire neighborhoods for the possibility of killing some Hamas members. Somehow the world is watching on - America says Israel is allowed to continue to defend itself, when that’s clearly far beyond what they’re doing now.

                If some Hamas soldiers die in the process, then so be it! Israel definitely does not want to eliminate all of Hamas until they have all of Palestine though, since they need an enemy to make their war legit, but at the same time, it’s impossible to eliminate Hamas without Palestine, because Hamas is comprised of untrained, uneducated kids who have seen nothing but war since they were children.

                • time_lord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  not taking into account that the Hamas attack itself was a retaliation for years upon years of Israeli attacks.

                  Why was Israel attacking the Palestinians? Because the Palestinians were attacking the Israelis, starting with the creation of Israel by the British.

          • Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            58
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            What you are getting wrong is that they ARE “glassing” the entirety of Gaza, with almost no restraint. That is not excusable, no matter which enemy you are fighting. The thing is, they won’t be able to kill Hamas either way, it’s only a choice between less Palestinian civilian casualties and more of them

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              1 year ago

              What you are getting wrong is that they ARE “glassing” the entirety of Gaza, with almost no restraint.

              Bold claims require strong evidence.

          • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Where is the evidence that they are not just randomly bombing? Knocking? Do they send a telegram?

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They are a professional army assaulting the most densely populated area in the world. Not letting refugees pass through their lines is already a war crime. Instead they seem to be compressing the population more and blaming Hamas for having the gall to fight at all.

            You don’t get to accuse the other side of using human shields as you kettle more civilians in with them.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Evil cunts are hypocrites?? What? Omg

        They support Hamas to keep attention off the Ukrainian invasion.

        Israel invade Palestine just as Russia do Ukraine…but somehow more inhumanely

      • Guydht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        41
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes because murdering millions of your own harmless citizens, who some served in your military is totally the same as fighting against a terror organization who massacred and pillaged your villages and keeps 200+ of your citizens captive.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think what we’re learning from this is that ghettos are a step on the path to genocide. That’s the link to Germany here. You put a subset of “your” people into a walled off place, at some point in the future unless you take down that wall and re-integrate those people, you’re gonna massacre them.

          Whether you think you’re capable of genocide or not, you are. We all are. And we need to be paying attention to the things that lead to it. And what this is demonstrating is that ghettos lead to genocide.

          • Guydht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            subset of “your” people

            No Palestinian, or Gazan ever thought of themselves as Israeli, and neither did Israel think of them as their own. The situation of Gazans is terrible, but again - they’re not part of Israel, and are never intending to be. That’s so different from Nazi Germany that it’s just insane to compare the two.

            Stop thinking of the Holocaust as a genocide. It’s so much more. It’s blatant racism, and a well tuned death machine. Something Israel both aren’t doing now, and didn’t do ever. Israel is only fighting for the good of its own people, and no one in the world can blame them, since every other single nation would’ve done the same. (Btw, same as Egypt who are doing what’s best for their people by not letting Gazans immigrate)

          • time_lord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s the other way around. Israel put them in a gheto because they literally had no other way to protect their citizens. Now that the Palestinians have found a way around that, they’re back to killing the Israelis. And Israel is responding again.

            • bamboo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the same reasoning the Nazis used though. They said that Jews caused Germany to lose WW1, Jews caused the pain and suffering and instability of the German people. This was German land, not Jewish land, and so they had no choice but to lock up and exterminate the Jews for the safety and wellbeing of their own.

              It was bullshit then and it’s bullshit now.

              • jarfil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Reinhard

                Nazis didn’t even “want” to exterminate the Jews… Gypsies yes, they shot those on sight, just like cripples… but all those Jews, Poles, Gays and similar, they “only” wanted to ship them all to Egypt or wherever in Africa… but those pesky Allies thwarted their plans, so “what were they supposed to do”. 🙄

                And look, Egypt is again refusing to let the “undesirables” in, only this time it’s the Palestinians… and the ones pushing them out are the Israelis. 😒

                Wonder what will the books end up calling this “operation”.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope when you realize what a batshit insane take this is, you feel bad enough to actually own it and grow as a person

            • Redrum714@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nope just not stupid enough to compare a religious war with a non religious war.

              • bh64@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                but you’re stupid enough that you can’t tell that religion is nothing more than masquerading power over the masses with the promise of a paradise.

                Religion is just politics but in the name of a not existent god so the ones in power need no justification of their actions other than “it’s God’s will”.

              • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s embarassing. I know 14yo who have a better understanding of the situation. You have no idea what you’re talking about.

                • Redrum714@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  One is a religious war and the other is not, that’s not an opinion, just a basic fact of reality. No idea how delusional you have to be to not comprehend that.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Living in reality does indeed help me sleep like a baby.

          I’ve bookmarked the page. See you in January.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I’m having an awesome day.

              Do you mean the bookmarking thing? Took 2 seconds. Didn’t even have to put down my coffee

              • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Mate, what the hell are you talkiing about? What are bookmarking for January? Come back to this world for a second maybe?!

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel is worse than Russia. Russia, in contrast, looks downright reasonable.

      In a few weeks, Israel has killed almost as many civilians as those that have died on both sides over the course of almost two years of the Russia-Ukraine war.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Everything any of these leftist fucks say is always wrong. It’s impossible to quantify it all in one post, but here’s the broad strokes.

            1. Hamas is a terror organization who steals from, tortures, and oppresses their own people. Hamas seeks to maximize civilian casualties however possible.

            2: Israel is not committing (or even attempting) genocide. This one’s especially bad because you’d have to be pants-on-head stupid to believe it. It’s just pure, distilled, antisemitism.

            3: Palestine isn’t a country, was never a country, and only Israel has ever been interested in making them a country.

            4: Russia and Israel are operating at exact opposite purposes. Russia is trying to rekindle the Russian Empire. Israel is just trying to not suffer genocide against a foreign regime that literally calls for genocide of Jews worldwide. When I say literally, I mean they literally put out a call to action after their attack for Jews to be attacked worldwide, prior to any Israeli military response.

            5: Israel is acting with severe restraint compared to what the US would do if a foreign nation invaded and murdered 45,000 people in their homes. Adjusted for population size, that’s what the comparable death toll would be in the US. We’d absolutely fucking level any country that did that. We fought WW2 over less. We fought Iraq and Iran over less than 10% of that

            It’s hard to call out specifics when every single thing every one of these people say is wrong.

            • TheBeege@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You haven’t read about the founding of modern Israel and the history of Zionism. Please do

              (Before accusing me if being pro-terrorist, pro-Hamas whatever, know that I consider both entities unnecessarily violent and evil. But it is important to know why they are that way)

        • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Numbers don’t lie.

          Neither Ukraine nor Russia come even close to as bloodthirsty for civilian lives as Israel. Israel is killing civilians and killing Hamas fighters as collateral damage. Ukraine and Russia are killing each other’s soldiers and killing civilians as collateral damage. They’re not the same.

            • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tell me you don’t have a degree without telling me you don’t have a degree

              • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                5 days for a comeback that weak?

                You should’ve left me crying after cooking up a little something for that long.

                • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, sounds like your most advanced exposure to statistics was “this is a joint probability”

                  Take a more advanced stats course. It’s really insightful and will open your mind.

              • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think this is likely correct. Lemmy’s users skew very young. It explains a lot about what opinions, sentiments and views are and are not popular around here. Obviously there are some oldsters like myself, but I think we’re more the exception rather than the rule.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That is continually changing as people find the site.

                  Early adoption sites are always full of young people and extremists early on.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fun fact about the UN, is that the Arab League has massive voting power due to “one nation one vote.” That’s how UNRWA got so corrupted.

      • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Invading a sovereign nation, killing innocents, bombing schools, hospitals, residential areas, forcefully relocating people, land grabbing, spreading dehumanizing propaganda…

        It is exactly the same thing what both Hamas and Israel have been doing.

      • mwguy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Haven’t seen the results of Russia’s artillery barrages in cities like Bahkmut? A similar barrages I’m Gaza would flatten every building.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    A poll published Friday found that only 49 percent of Israelis want to hold off on the ground offensive against Hamas, down from 65 percent last week.

    Disappointing to say the least.

    • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It usually takes a few weeks for the party line to consolidate after big events. For one thing, propaganda must be spread and disseminated, which takes time.

    • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      but understandable - after all, there’s still quite a few hostages that the terrorists are holding. hopefully they’re being treated humanely and not, you know, tortured & etc but terrorists thrive on terrorism…

  • Huschke@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure Aliens exist and there are big signs around our solar system that say something like “Avoid that system, murderous apes”.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Warning, Interstellar Travel Insurance does not apply in the Sol System. The Galactic Council Security Office warns travelers to stay away from Sol and specifically Earth due to endemic violence on the planet.

    • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isn’t single living thing on this planet that won’t fight woth others of its kind. Cats fight cats, ants fight ants and so on and so forth. I am sire the aliens would be doing the same shit.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s sorta true, but like cats and ants aren’t exactly sentient lol. They don’t commit war crimes and genocide because they can.

        Also maybe a space faring species has no issues with war with how much… space there is lol.

        Aw who am I kidding, its probably just like Elite Dangerous free for fall

        • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or it just means there is always a scarcity of either need or want and it will never go away.

  • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Generals gathered in their masses
    Just like witches at black masses
    Evil minds that plot destruction
    Sorcerer of death’s construction

    In the fields, the bodies burning
    As the war machine keeps turning
    Death and hatred to mankind
    Poisoning their brainwashed minds

    Politicians hide themselves away
    They only started the war
    Why should they go out to fight?
    They leave that role to the poor, yeah

    Time will tell on their power minds
    Making war just for fun
    Treating people just like pawns in chess
    Wait till their judgement day comes, yeah!

    Now in darkness, world stops turning
    Ashes where their bodies burning
    No more war pigs have the power
    Hand of God has struck the hour

    Day of judgement, God is calling
    On their knees, the war pigs crawling
    Begging mercy for their sins
    Satan laughing, spreads his wings

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know why Satan is always the bad guy. If it exists I would be on his side over the opposition. Way I see it the theists are the ones doing these wars

      • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Satan isn’t always the bad guy. Satan is also the Lightbringer, the one who exposes the Demiurge and brings reason to humanity. The character is often used as a stand-in for reason and liberation, often drawing on the themes of Sophia but with more schadenfreude involved.

  • Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess the silver lining of this shitshow happening right as I joined Lemmy is that its giving me a massive list of hateful idiots and servers to block right out of the gate

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But is that actually true? A lot can be gained from killing your enemies and taking their stuff.

        I’m not saying it’s right in any way, but the motivation should be as clear as any motivation ever has been.

        • 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Violence is the most direct and effective method of control, of obtaining and maintaining power.

          And that is why nation states have a monopoly on it

          • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            and it’s also why the propaganda machine always pushes the “violence is not the answer” narrative

            • idoubledo@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              So your logic is stop Israel’s “violence”, but let Palestinians continue with their “resistance”?

              • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Just BROADLY speaking, the pro Palestinian take right now is that Israel should be removed and Palestine given all of the territory.

                Like, that’s the take. They don’t just want an end to the violence - Israel wants that too. Hamas has been dedicated to the destruction of Jews and Israel for basically forever.

                So it’s asymmetrical.

                The pro Israel take is “destroy Hamas so that these attacks stop and there can be peace.” But it’s important to note that up until the October 7 attack Israel only wanted peace. This new policy is a reaction to an unprecedented attack.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That era ended after WWII, that’s not how it works anymore… Anything worthwhile gets destroyed and polluted if you fight with modern arms

          We’ve gotten more advanced - now, you can make billions through the act of war itself! If you position yourself correctly through investments, you too can drink from the firehouse of money aimed at the military industrial complex whenever war occurs

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know if the leader of Hamas dropped 4x legendary skins, 2X xp multiplier and $30 worth of in game currency a teenager would have them dead by morning.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            When’s the last time a soldier forced his way into your home and told you to bring him food or he’d kill you?

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well there’s violence and there’s the capacity for violence. The most effective thing is the capacity for violence. The actual violence isn’t useful; except as a means to prove one’s capacity.

            The best is to achieve that without having to actually hurt anyone.

            • Siegfried@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nope, they are not

              Unless you consider voting full engage civilian violence

                • Siegfried@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  All of the civil rights in my country were slowly incorporated by democratic means through the last century.

                  Edit, this includes paid vacations, paid maternity leaves for both mother and father, female vote, abolishing slavery, public health, free secular public education (12 years obligatory + university), unemployment insurance, universal income*, abortion

                  Edit2: that doesn’t mean that all rights are won without violence and my country had a lot of violence, but it was about who was holding the power. Rights were voted through the decades almost independently of who was in power.

    • dumdum666@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah - we should be glad that weapons technology actually evolved to a point, where carpet fire bombings of cities like Dresden or Hamburg (WW2) are a thing of the past.

      • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget Tokyo! Those we’re all war crimes interestingly enough.

        Oddly the siege of Gaza may very well fall into that category with the amount of ordinance that’s been dropped, although the terminology would likely be different due to the guided aspect.

        Carpet bombing of cities, towns, villages, or other areas containing a concentration of civilians is considered a war crime[5] as of Article 51 of the 1977 Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions.[6][7][8]
        The term obliteration bombing is sometimes used to describe especially intensified bombing with the intention of destroying a city or a large part of the city. The term area bombing refers to indiscriminate bombing of an area and also encompasses cases of carpet bombing, including obliteration bombing.

        Perhaps it might even get it’s own unique term someday. I do find it quite similar from what I’m reading on the first instance of carpet bombing though, the bombing of Barcelona

        Along with the variance of the times between each individual attack, this had a demoralizing effect on the civilian population, which suffered prolonged anxiety quite out of proportion to the number of bombs dropped over a long period of time. Coupled with the fact that there was little discernible military value in the choice of targets within the city, and the cessation of the attacks for no apparent reason

        Edit: sorry meant to add this as well

        The Italian bombers dropped 44 tons of bombs.[7] Rather than aiming at military targets, the Italians intended to destroy industrial areas of the city and demoralize the Republican side, in what some authors have described as the first aerial carpet bombing in history.[1] Their targets and declared objectives were military warehouses, arms factories, trains with soldiers, and the port, but civil buildings, cinemas, consulates, and theatres were also hit or destroyed during the bombing.[8]

        • mea_rah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s probably worth pointing out that the Geneva Convention article you’re quoting was written a couple decades after both Tokyo and Barcelona events.

            • mea_rah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying it’s not a war crime according to the definition. I was just pointing out that the specific crimes precede the definition by a couple of decades.

        • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But they weren’t war-crimes at the time and in fact, to the contrary, were very much in the spirit of war as it was being prosecuted by all of the belligerents.

          There’s been a lot of really good work on the history of air power and the logic that led to deliberately targeting civilians in WW2 on all sides. It wasn’t necessarily as nakedly bloodthirsty as it appears to us now looking back. If you honestly believed that targeting civilians would shorten the war and ultimately result in less suffering, it was actually a moral decision, or at least morally ambiguous.