- cross-posted to:
- technews@radiation.party
- fediverse@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- technews@radiation.party
- fediverse@lemmy.ml
Several years in the making, GitLab is now very actively implementing ActivityPub! 🙌
The end-goal is to support AP for merge requests (aka pull requests), meaning git.alice.dev can send a merge request to gitlab.com/Bob/project.git
In the most expansive version of this vision, anyone running an AP-enabled git instance (with one or more repos) can send MRs to another instance’s repo, without having to sign up there.
For starters this will be GitLab-specific, but that’s already huge for self-hosters of GitLab who currently don’t benefit from the internal interop of the GitLab.com network.
First bite-sized todo on the implementation path there is ‘subscribe to project releases’. And yes, they are aware of ForgeFed and will likely make use of that spec for the advanced features of this epic.
Smart move by GitLab; through ActivityPub they’re getting a distributed version of GitHub’s social layer.
Hugely impactful as a way around GitHub’s moat as the de-facto social network of open source development. I follow hundreds of developers on GitHub, though mainly just to keep track of who I’ve interacted with, effectively adding them to a dev-specific address book.
I have a much harder time keeping track of non-GitHub devs on alt platforms, but if I could follow them on the fediverse that’s actually preferable over GitHub’s proprietary follow list.
Cross-posted to Mastodon: https://writing.exchange/@erlend/110949168258462158
You must log in or # to comment.
I’m so making an instance to hide my bad reputation from that 1 abandoned PR
AHAHAH 😂
deleted by creator
I’m not really following. Can you explain why it would be better? I’ve never had an issue using GitHub.
GitHub is a great platform, which has championed open-source for decades, now. I don’t think anybody has anything to blame them for (except people not liking the idea that AI is trained on their code, like sibling mentioned), it’s more about fears it may go bad. Because basically, it’s where most of the code of the world is hosted, it’s a single point of failure. People also have questioned the pertinence of having all open-source code hosted on a proprietary platform. And the acquisition by Microsoft also had a chilling effect on those of us who remember Internet Explorer 6’s Microsoft more than VSCode’s Microsoft.
For those reasons, it is desirable for those who love the idea of decentralization to look up for alternatives. But even there, it’s perfectly fine to stay on GitHub, “decentralizing” doesn’t require everybody to leave. :) Plus, even when using an other forge, it’s still good to keep publishing mirrors on GitHub for visibility and discoverability, currently.
I know a big sticking point for many people is that all code on GitHub feeds into CoPilot.
I don’t understand how this would help anyone who’s still stuck on GitHub for whatever reason to be able to escape GitHub. GitHub likely won’t support this. I guess it depends on why someone is ‘forced’ to use GitHub still. I’ve seen different reasons mentioned.
That’s freaking rad!
I hope federation becomes the new standard for interoperability all over the InternetThere’s lots of talk about “web 3” as regarding some crypto nonsense, but I think activitypub is the next step of the web, where different platforms communicate and you can have your home and you reach out to everywhere you want to be, and it’s all integrated at your home.
There’s lots of talk about “web 3” as regarding some crypto nonsense, but I think activitypub is the next step of the web, where different platforms communicate and you can have your home and you reach out to everywhere you want to be, and it’s all integrated at your home.
Exactly. The real web 3 is decentralization, with the conveniences of web 2, but with the decentralization of web 1.
YES! We really need to change the mindset of “Web3 = Blockchain/Crypto/NFT” to “Web3 = decentralized”
To make it clearer we suggest a renaming of the crypto Web3 to Web3.0, and the decentralization version Web3.1.
No, wait, that’s too confusing, let’s make that Web3.0 gen 1 and Web3.0 gen 2, respectively.
Kind regards, the USB Implementers Forum.
Wake me when we’re at Web3.11 For Workgroups.
Web3.0 2x2 SuperSpeed
Just pull a Capcom and name it World Wide Web 3 ~ Internet Federation ~ ActivityPub Edition Advanced Super ULTRA
No, pull a Sega and make it Web 3 & Knuckles and you have to snap your existing browser underneath it for the full experience.
Or a Valve and, err, okay maybe that doesn’t work so well.
Fingers crossed it’s going to be compatible with what ForgeFed is working hard for years 🤞.
Gitea/Forgejo/Codeberg have ongoing work implementing this.
Codeberg uses gitea
As soon as Forgejo and Gitlab are able to share issue tracking between them, Github is so doomed in the open-source community
This feels like such a great step in the right direction. I Selfhost gitea, which also has this planned and is working on it, but it’s taking a lot of time. I might consider switching to git lab if they are faster.
This is a great idea. Gitlab has too many features (bloated) for the average selfhoster. I hope forgery/gitea also follow the gitlab to enable activitypub
This is so based!
This is amazing! Honestly a no brainer feature. Having to create an account just to contribute on one project’s instance is not a great experience currently and the reason I mainly stick to Github.
Looking at their epic and list of tickets, they look serious about it.
This is awesome.
Is there a clone of Lemmy on GitLab or Codeberg?
Isn’t the official repo for Lemmy on GitHub?
gitlab is allowed
Would’ve taken source control and social ‘engineering’ (sure I should be using a better term) to be disparate, why is this good ?
Nice
Kind of lame that they’re wasting time on gimmicky features like this rather than stuff people have been asking for (like Conan registry support)
I self host Gitlab because I want to be in control of my private repos. If I wanted to release open source projects and collaborate with people, I would use the SaaS version. Public instances that encourage contributions like Gnome have open registration, but activating federation seems like it would just add a new layer of moderation headaches for very little real benefit.
Am I missing something? Besides marketing for Gitlab, what real benefits could this bring to users?
its very much wanted, I dont want to have to create new accounts on every gitlab instance for all different projects like KDE, GNOME and others when I want to report a bug or something
If you can’t be bothered to spend 1 minute to create an account, then you probably can’t be bothered to create an actionable bug report or a merge-able PR.
I’m not against federation in general, but gitlab isn’t twitter or reddit. It’s a utility for doing work, and I don’t see how it will do anything but grow the mountain of bloat on which gitlab is sitting.
its not me not being bothered, its just annoying having to create an account for 1 issue I’ll probably never use again so its a waste of time
Disagree. I self host three gitlab instances, and use gitlab.com as well as another gitlab. I have bothered to create accounts on all of those, created meaningful bug reports and Mrs on all of them, and I’d like to see this.
