It specifically refers to this shorthand ?: that works like this:
$value = $thing_that_could_be_truthy ?: 'fallback value';
# same as
$value = $thing_that_could_be_truthy ? $thing_that_could_be_truthy : 'fallback value';
The condition is also the value if it is truthy
Oh unfortunately these imaginary pains are those which hurt every day
Hopefully it gets easier so I can use n(o)curses
php too
…but we don’t talk about php
On the left you have Elvis Presley, while on the right there’s the so-called Elvis operator
Brb, gonna code flappy bird with it
That’s super standard for actual infrastructure
My heart is healed for the day ❤️
New motto: open source, open purse
The a series is pretty good bang for your buck, if you can’t afford that and neither used ones, then maybe you could settle for one of the cheaper Asian ones supported by Divest OS
Amazing, I read this in a deep narrator voice and now I want a tale of a game engine developer living in a stereotypical dystopian cyberpunk society
Gotta band it Windows tho, it just feels right, I want to enjoy my fake typewriter
3rd fastest
And 1st tastiest
Lol, yet sometimes I wonder if my hello world contains vulnerabilities
That’s really cool! And yeah the bootloader locking checks out with into from other guides.
That unbricking talk flies over my head on the other hand, it sounds like one of those fake tech speaks to my uncultured self lol
How did you install Graphene in the first place?
I’m not ok with those things obviously, but I don’t know enough about them to say what I think is all, I’m just talking about the “technical” aspect and that at a base level I think that the effort to make a more anonymous service is respectable, though I would have never used a service like this personally. Of course that also implies that anything passing through it should be harder to track and moderate, for good and bad
I think that what I was talking about is exactly why they say what they say, for people that want to have more privacy/antonymy it’s there to tell them that the system itself is inherently limited so they can’t expect to be completely safe and the provider can do whatever they want or need to do by law (and here it seems from what they say, if it is 100% true, that they have been trying not to comply for the users’ sake) when you rely on their service.
About the non-refundability, it’s true, though it’s not any more suspicious than the service in itself trying what they can to keep the users’ anonymity, so it is at least coherent, I guess it’s really up to how much you trust them there, you know what you’re getting into after all
Sorry, I wasn’t saying it wasn’t, I just found it funny, I do trust you know what you’re talking about, had no reason to doubt you