• cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Which is funny because No Step on Snek is more anti-authoritarian than right. It just has a bit of a right-leaning connotation

    Edit: both sides think the other is the authoritarian one.

    Authoritarian != policy you don’t like

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      American right libertarians are either republicans in denial, people with suspiciously strong opinions on the age of consent, or tech bro billionaires and their simps. They’ll gladly tongue fuck the boot on their neck as long as it means someone else is getting stepped on more

    • VolatileExhaustPipe@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yet throwaway is a racist and aligns well with nationalists:

      This shit is why not every migrant is good. They bring their shitty homophobic culture with them.

      They would be cheered for with that sentence in Nazi bars.

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well yeah. The left is associated with communism, which is basically “everyone is a slave to the state”. Leftists are inherently authoritarians.

      • bryce0110@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not really what communism is.

        Neither left nor right is inherently authoritarian. Both contain authoritarian and libertarian ideologies.

        • Throwaway@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s take a second. How exactly would communism work? What if someone didn’t want to work?

          • Lemminary@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I love how this question ignores the consequences of not working in the current system, and that modern forms of forced labor are both common and do exist.

            And inb4 you reply: no, I don’t support communism but your question made me chuckle.

            • Throwaway@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can go beg and be homeless in the current system. In Communism, you get sent to gulag.

              • VolatileExhaustPipe@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The mother of a friend of mine was homeless in the GDR. She got a flat, she got education, she got work, she got a nice family, she had healthcare, they bought a house. My friend is much worse off now.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah, yeah, communism equals gulag bc there are no other possible ways of doing communism. And good thing you can be poor and homeless now, sounds like a grand ol’ time! Just ignore the fact that some folks do pretty crime bc they’d rather spend time in jail for a guaranteed meal and shelter, but w/e, at least it’s not Disney fairytale communism.

          • within_epsilon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I want to own the value I produce. Currently I sell my time to an owner. The value I produce through my work is sold by the owner. Any excess after costs goes to the owner. The owner did not work to produce the value.

            Why should owners be supported by the excess value produced by workers?

          • mimichuu_@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If there genuinely, no matter what, is no way to get someone to work on something without threatening them with starving to death if they don’t do it, please ask yourself this: Is that work necessary? Is that work worth it?