The bottom line is he could drool and only say the word potato and the fact is still that we are voting for a platform and a supreme court, not a public speaker.
The bottom line is he could drool and only say the word potato and the fact is still that we are voting for a platform and a supreme court, not a public speaker.
I think op was asking for suggestions
Great contribution to the thread, thanks!
Thank you for your service ❤️
You always forget to set a password for root?
What metal was the skull made out of
Having principles related to Human Rights is only toxic to people who are already problematic
Downvoted by commies
Such as?
Edit: I mean you can contrive something if you’re MacGyver but there’s no remotely standard use case for that.
Here we encounter the common conservative trope, “I don’t understand, therefore no.”
I just came
- needs root
Ah, brilliant, I’m sure it will take over immediately
This is it. The end. Thanks for coming to their Ted Talk.
But dude you don’t understand, he reverse uno’d you. The end.
You’re conflating the ability to live without suffering with the right to live without suffering. Figure out the difference and then proceed.
Unless you’re one of those religious cult weirdos who thinks we “deserve suffering” because of some angry sky wizard.
Everyone knows how famously loved the Afghanistan pull out was and is, especially by right wing voters.
Once they get an algorithm that isn’t absolute shit, bam we’ll be good