Why does meat need lobbying? Most people already consider it essential and like the taste.
It’s like lobbying for sugar…
Wait a minute…
Why does meat need lobbying? Most people already consider it essential and like the taste.
It’s like lobbying for sugar…
Wait a minute…
That’s cause there is no target audience. His supporters already think he can do no wrong so who is this film trying to win over?
All that AND a felon ehh.
Fair points but as someone who works in cybersecurity. Phishing emails can happen without admin access. I haven’t heard of any randsomware that is triggered by just clicking on a link.
I think there should be some restrictions but highly technical people should slowly be given more and more control as they gain more trust/experience.
Good point, them leaving says I don’t want to be involved not that I want to stop the injustice.
I thought my comment was pretty clear that some rules are justified and that the IT person can just be the bearer of bad news.
Maybe not, hopefully this comment clarifies.
In my experience it’s been IT people telling me you can’t use a certain tool or have more control over your computer cause of their rules.
The expression is appropriate but the meme assumes that im doubting the IT person’s expertise. I’m not, I’m just not liking the rules that get in the way of my work. Some rules do make sense though.
Edit: just wanted to point out, yes I agree, you need the rules, they are still annoying tho.
This is why it makes no sense to increase investment in renewables AND fossil fuel.
It’s like the person going on a diet, eating healthy food AND fast food.
Yeah, but to be fair, any surveillance program is bad.
The first part is what makes them so weird.
Nah, it’s more like when you have a hammer, everything is a nail.
Conservatives only have one play, it’s to just keep going more right (as in, privatize things more and more to keep “fixing” things).
They have already gone after abortion.
What’s that? Fertility rate is low? We just got to try harder!
Ooo I know:
Evolutionary speaking, it makes sense to compete within your own species when times are good, cause there is no threat to the survival of the entire group.
Conversely, when times are bad and the entire species is threatened, it’s best to cooperate as much as possible instead of compete.
Idk… frame it on BLM people?
Ooo, I know, society collapses and they think they have all the guns!
Wait so if a game doesn’t not need online connection it can say buy?
That is such a huuuge advantage to indie devs that can let you own things.
What if he is not mentally a 5 year old but people keep letting him do what he wants and he is trying to keep pushing that envelope.
Him acting like a 5 year old and getting away with it is also on society imo.
I mean, she is not trying to keep a private life, she is trying to capitalize on her 15 mins of fame. If she wants the fame, the label should be fair game.
I agree but I also like to point out that the AI craze started with LLMs and those MLs have been around before OpenAI.
So if openAI never released chat GPT, it wouldn’t have become synonymous with crypto in terms of false promises.
Not only that, image analysis and statistical guesses have always been around and do not need ML to work. It’s just one more tool in the toolbox.
How could it be weaponized?
It costs money (relative to your company size) to do any legal action, a big company suing means they lose waaay more $ than the small opponent.
Same thing with the small guy, it’s not a lot of $ to sue but it’s still a big chunk of your business so you would want to avoid unless your pretty sure the law is on your side.
Personally, I’ve been seeing way more markers when you zoom in for bigger businesses meaning they are probably going heavy on pay to show.
If it’s well structured then day ta. If it’s more raw then dah ta.
Idk why, why the second way sounds more raw.