• thepiguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My dumass thought op meant programming language, and I spent 2 minutes thinking of some sarcastic reply.

    • Jakylla@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      ++++++++++[>++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++++>+++<<<<-]
      >-.>-.--------.+++++++.-------.>----..<.>>++.<<-.>+.>.<<++.>---.---.--.<-----.++++++.--.
      
    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I know it’s wrong, but there’s something about the forbiddenness of JS that makes it sexy.

      Oh, baby, you wanna do what with my strings?

      Jokes aside, Scala or Haskell, hands down. Those are sexy languages that make gorgeous code.