• LUC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    70
    ·
    2 days ago

    deport all the illegals. its easier and faster than house building.

      • LUC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        2 days ago

        we deport and then the can come the legal way!

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          dude, as much as i’m anti-immigration, you’re overdoing it, and also, your proposals are ineffective.

          in germany, for example, the population that immigrated since 2012 makes up approx. 3% of the total population. that means that the population is roughly 3% larger than it would be without that immigration.

          that is what you should be talking about. 3% larger population means higher workforce (supply of labor), and therefore lower wages (prices for labor). That is because the immigrants add almost no demand for labor (since they have a low buying power).

          Demand for labor is mainly driven by growth, and we’ve had two big waves of growth since 1800: Quantitative (industrialization) and qualitative (IT work). Since both of these two waves end their growth approx. now, the demand for labor goes down. There’s no point in importing more labor force, it would only make the wages go down. That is what you have to talk about: the decreasing wages through the import of cheap labor. It’s essentially wage-dumping in the own country. That is what the people should be talking about. Not racism. We’re not better people than them, we just need to get the workforce smaller to drive the wages up.

          That requires, ofc, that the borders are closed also for goods and products. If products have to be produced inside the country because the borders are closed, companies can’t just do the wage dumping in another country.

          Btw, almost everywhere the number of illegal immigrants is extremely low. In the US, they make up 25% of all immigrants, IIRC, which is not much. There’s not much there to talk about, especially since these illegal immigrants are good at hiding and hard to catch. But what you can do is to study the socio-economic consequences of immigration/high birth rate and then draw your conclusions. If you really care about the people, you’d first close the borders in all developed countries, and then drop the birth rate really really low. That would give power to the people, since they are in higher demand, and keep the wages as high as possible, because the production would stay approx. constant (think the farmland is constant) but the consumption is lowest, so there’s more resources for everyone.

          • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            This seems like a really bad take.

            Do take a look at the age pyramid @Miaou posted. Germany needs a lot of young people to herd its old people. German ministers flying to the Phillipines and Kenya and Brazil to find care workers – that’s for a reason! And dropping the birth rate lower does not mean more high-paying jobs, it means more low-paying care jobs in relation to total number of jobs.

            In addition there are a bunch of jobs that Germans don’t really do anymore (plucking asparagus, slaughtering hogs, cleaning office buildings, …) because they are badly paid hard labor which are however in some way useful to society.

            Granted, preventing migrants from taking bad jobs may mean that high-paying automation jobs open up. But that’s the only silver lining. (Fwiw, Japan had a very strict immigration policy, because they figured that elderly care might be something easily accomplished with robot dogs and other gimmicks. It turns out though that that assumption was wrong. It also turns out that a lot of people from countries like Malaysia and the Phillipines would love to work in Japan, despite the racism. So Japan has adapted its policies on foreign labor somewhat now.)

          • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            in germany, for example, the population that immigrated since 2012 makes up approx. 3% of the total population. that means that the population is roughly 3% larger than it would be without that immigration.

            That doesn’t sound correct. Source? As of 2022, 19% of Germany was foreign born. Unless there was some kind of mass immigration prior to 2012 - which I don’t see in the stats - you appear to be mistaken.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Please stop parroting this notion that Canada’s problems mirror those if the united states.

      The number of so called “illegals” pales in comparison to the number of foreign investors buying up property and jacking IP the rental rates.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m just going to correct you here. The problem if Canadian housing isn’t foreign investors (they account by like 2% of the real state market), but the absurd zoning laws and the “missing middle”.

        Check our “oh the urbanity” youtube channel, they do a really good analysis on Canadian houses markets.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      By illegals you mean people with different ethnicities immigrating LEGALLY should be kicked out because they’re you know different