lmao, this is a theory, and this study has nt only been peer-reviewed, it doesn’t seem to have gained much of any traction in the academic community in the last 20 years.
A theory is the most solid thing science can produce. What you’re wanting to say is hypothesis. Also, OP should provide the relevant section of the original review by Baker and Bellis 1995
lol, who told you that?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490400200105#:~:text=The human penis%2C with a,back over%2Funder the glans.
lmao, this is a theory, and this study has nt only been peer-reviewed, it doesn’t seem to have gained much of any traction in the academic community in the last 20 years.
don’t believe everything you find on google.
Your comment hasn’t been peer reviewed, so I’m gonna take your advice and not believe you.
A theory is the most solid thing science can produce. What you’re wanting to say is hypothesis. Also, OP should provide the relevant section of the original review by Baker and Bellis 1995
it always amuses me when random strangers on the internet believe that they can read my mind and know what I want.
i said “theory” because that’s what I meant, and it has more that the one definition you gave.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator