• Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Me too. You would literally have to give me money, for me to sacrifice a part of my chilling out time.

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The notion that more is better than less has been a dominant paradigm in various fields of inquiry, from economics to psychology. However, this paradigm has been challenged by recent philosophical developments that question the validity and applicability of this assumption. I have examined the arguments for and against the traditional paradigm of more versus less, and explored some of the exceptional cases that defy this binary opposition. In order to reconcile these conflicting perspectives and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between larger and smaller quantities, further research is still required.

        • ngdev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. When I was a kid, my parents gave me a job at the family business. It was great, they said I could work half days. I could do whatever i wanted with the other 12 hours.

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And that should be the goal of a society. Currently we work because as individuals we’re forced to. As humanity we’re already past the forced need. Enabling people to choose would be more beneficial and we have the innate quality of finding meaningful ways to spend our time.

      • Peruvian_Skies@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that we suck at allocating productivity. For example, we produce enough food for everyone but don’t distribute it half as well as we should, so people still starve while food rots somewhere else. We waste resources propping up a whole host of parasites that add no value to society, such as famous-for-being-famous celebrities, advertisers, speculators and redundant managers, while underpaying the people who actually produce wealth. And we want a brand new iPhone every year, a brand new car every two years, etc, and by and large don’t recycle. We’re wasteful.

        Most of the actually important and time-consuming work is automated already. If we were smart about what work we do, an 8-hour work week for everyone would be more than possible. But we are so inefficient with our productivity due to warped priorities that most of us barely scrape by as it is.

        • astraeus@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Our excessive lack of proper planning and foresight really gets accentuated when you evaluate how wasteful and inefficient any of our processes are. I’ve been listening to Walden on audiobook recently, it’s almost as if Thoreau really did transcend his time and saw that the future would be equally as futile as his present at properly providing for humanity in a meaningful way.

          We would rather have luxuries and pleasures than fulfilling proper needs, work tends to take away from our needs in ways we overlook.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t work if I could, but I’d end up doing the same shit all day anyway, but for fun.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This just in: humans do not enjoy any degree of enslavement.

    Check back next year to see if we’ve managed to break the spirit of the human race.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is true. It’s because we evolved over many hundreds of thousands of years as egalitarian hunter-gatherers and only relatively recently invented things like agriculture, big stratified societies, the bulk accumulation of wealth and property and work.

      • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This reminds me of a recent meme pushing back against the “greed is human nature” narrative. Was something like:

        “If you see a bear riding a bicycle at the circus, do you assume it is the nature of bears to ride bicycles?”

  • wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    no one has ever wanted to work, you’re supposed to pay them enough that they’re willing to work anyway

    • zerkrazus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Why do you want to work here?”

      Uh, I don’t, but this stupid thing called not dying requires me to have money and you’re offering to pay me money for doing a job you need doing.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s the thing - I want to work. I love it - I create solutions to problems. It’s who I am, and when I have nothing else to do I wander around turning scraps into something useful. I became a programmer because I could create without worries about wasting materials.

    What I hate is being exploited like a resource - 40 hours a week is a lot. It’s enough I use every free moment just getting my energy back. I have no time to work on my own projects or properly socialize - I just get worn down until I burn out and can’t wake up in the morning.

    I’m also very aware of the impact of my actions, and nearly every possible job involves draining the world of something to make money for someone who has plenty.

    I don’t care if other people get to coast because of my work, I just want to solve hard problems in a way that adds to the world.

    I do care when I’m used as a pawn in the game of capitalism - But meet my basic and I’d spend my time creating

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cause 40hrs a week is a schedule for workers on a production line with machine tools doing monotonous work. It’s hard, but it doesn’t require you to think much. Thinking, changing contexts is hard.

      Ah, also you really are a resource, only your employer is a resource for you too, to get money which you then use for your own purposes. You are mutually resources for each other, that’s the point.

      Well, also it seems that in the olden days, when we didn’t have internet etc, it was a bit more normal to do your own hobbies etc at work, unofficial tea breaks, and in general many things other than work. Though I’m from Russia, and the Soviet joke says “they imitate pay, we imitate work”.

      • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some IT companies also try to make sure you can work on your hobbies in free Time ( in my case it works like this. Here is a room with 3d printers raspberry pi etc. Have fun, Just make sure your work is done and clients dont complain )

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t speak about other people, but for me such things really improve efficiency. You should be able to relax when doing intellectual work.

          • Nekomancer@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah like, in my current WFH implementation support position I’m able to work on school work and paint Warhammer minis if everything else is done. I’m gaining new skills which will benefit the company thanks to going to school, thanks to the hobbying I’m happier so my mental health is better so I’m able to have near perfect attendance, and still all my work scheduled is done every day. I really don’t see why this idea that ppl need to be working 100% of the workday every day persists. The situation I’m in is basically a win all around, but some suit with a spreadsheet still sees only the opportunity cost lost by <100% productivity which yields .1% lower profits or something

            • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That suit is incompetent. He compares real metrics with imagined metrics, of course the latter are going to be better.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, also you really are a resource, only your employer is a resource for you too

        indeed. I think pretty much everyone agrees the problem is the distribution of those resources. Much is given by us for very little in return.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You give as little as you can give for as much as you can get. I’d rather say distribution of negotiating power. And the way to fix this is making it easier to do business in your sphere as much as possible at all costs. And I don’t mean making it more profitable for existing businesses, I mean there being as many businesses as possible and them being easy to start, so that the negotiating power would even out.

          Which moves us to the IP, patent, copyright laws, which make it hard starting a business in many areas, and any kind of regulation and certification that makes it seriously hard to start a business really. Which is, BTW, the reason regulatory laws directed at fighting Apple, Meta etc are also killing many other things we don’t even see cause it happens in conceptual stage.

    • this@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m an audio technician who works at a news studio and this statement resonates with me strongly. I’m trying to learn game audio so I can spend more time doing something that I personally feel is productive towards society, hopefully I can make a better living doing that then what I currently do for money.

    • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I absolutely love this: “The Miami Herald published an article in 1981 about an 89-year-old man named Sammy James. James had worked for decades as a crate nailer and said his fast moves earned him the nickname, “The Nailer.””

      His job title was a crate nailer, but he got the nickname from his fast moves. That’s like being so good at operating the cash register you earn the nickname “The Cashier”

  • GiddyGap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a reason why it’s called “work” and “free time.” Most prefer free time to do whatever they actually want to do.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I do workforce planning/management. No one wants to work by default. It is up to the organisation to do enough for their employees to compensate their employees so that they don’t mind having to work. Whether culture, financial, work-life balance, etc.

    Employers need workers but employees just need money. It is up to the employer to make a convincing argument that what they offer in exchange for finite portions of a person’s life is reasonable, especially if they want to reduce costs with retention.

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work in permitting and I get to see a lot of businesses in a lot of industry types. Everything from small mom and pop places to places that have hundreds of employees, small contract jobs shops all the way up to massive chemical manufacturers. One common question I ask is about staffing, typically if a business doesn’t have enough staff to run the business appropriately it’s a good indicator of whether they will be able to meet their permit requirements.

      By and large the only businesses who say, “Nobody wants to work anymore,” are places that don’t pay enough. Every single time it’s a pay issue, maybe rarely it’s a personality problem. I had one new business (that’s particularly dirty and hard to hire for) come in and they wanted to start up fast, rather than hiring and training new employees they literally went to their 3 competitors in town and hired their staff directly. An extra $2.5 an hour, 17 people left which nearly crippled the competition, and they had fully trained staff that were more than happy to work in that type of business.

      • zerkrazus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        By and large the only businesses who say, “Nobody wants to work anymore,” are places that don’t pay enough.

        Yep, pretty much. Funny, you don’t hear about this being a problem for jobs paying $100,000+. Weird, that.

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My employer struggled to hire a meat guy for three years, as they only wanted to offer minimum wage without benefits. They’d score the occasional hire, but that hire would inevitably quit after a few weeks when they realized it wasn’t worth the pay. Both the store owner and the meat manager would continue to grumble about how “Nobody wants to work anymore”, rather than facing the reality that nobody wants to work for shit pay and no benefits, as evident by the multiple hires who said “Fuck this job” and took their services elsewhere. Eventually they coughed up more and wound up landing a certified meat cutter with experience. Crazy how nature do that.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your blog entry seems singularly focused, which left me with questions. After having read the Snope article, which was more broad and informative, my questions were answered.

          Honestly not trying to criticize your blog entry, but just stating that it didn’t seem as well written as a Snopes article to me.

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    According to a new survey … 1 in 5 executive leaders agree with this statement: “No one wants to work”.

    So, 4 in 5 executive leaders DO NOT agree with this statement, yet the message in the media is that “dammit, no one wants to work!”.

    Peak journalism.

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most people that say “people don’t want to work anymore” typically don’t themselves do any work

  • faintedheart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many of us are only working because we can’t afford not to work. This bullshit world is designed in that way.