• formergijoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    259
    ·
    6 days ago

    I agree! If Elon musk cannot show up to his offices at Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter, xAI, and Washington for 8 hours Monday-Friday, he should be fired without severance as CEO or co-chair of his government department.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    You got to love this. The Pentagon just failed its 7th audit in a row. It has a budget of $1tr. And yet the cost savings team decides that penny pinching by making life harder for workers is where the real savings are to be found. Not the giant black hole of finance which is the military industrial complex.

    • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 days ago

      Noooo shhhhh, we’re not supposed to talk about HOW THE PENTAGON HAS NEVER PASSED AN AUDIT. We’re supposed to be talking about the border, come on people, get it together.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      You’ve gotta look at it from the perspective of a poor multibillionaire who desperately needs to buy his fifth superyatch so he can work his five CEO jobs remotely

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Unless Musk somehow copied himself several times, he is working remote for most of his companies each day.

  • DankDingleberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome”. this is and was always the reason american businesses were eager to force everybody back tp work. eat the rich.

    • Ænima@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t forget to include giving middle-management a reason to exist as well as justifying the commercial properties expenses! Man do I hate capitalism…

  • resetbypeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    5 days ago

    So, he and his cabinet will be working 8 hours a day at least 5 days a week in DC ? Can we get that in written please ?

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Maybe not in DC, but don’t underestimate how many hours most of these psychopaths actually work. They do come to work (maybe not in DC, but to some office somewhere) and work for 100 hours a week, because they place no value on anything other than work. You can fault them for many things, but billionaires are almost always true psychopaths with no concept of anything beyond working to achieve power.

      Trump is a different story. He’ll say the golf course is his office, where he makes his deals.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 days ago

        You can fault them for many things, but billionaires are almost always true psychopaths with no concept of anything beyond working to achieve power.

        I can definitely fault them for that

      • WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 days ago

        Disagree. When you look at their schedules a lot of work hours are actually like lunch meetings or golf trips or whatever they need to do to justify networking without actual work.

        • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          I remember my last job, I would have to take days off for sick days, or half days for the Dentists. My boss however would send out emails like “Hey I am going out of town to Palm Springs, I’ll be there for 3 weeks, I will be available for phone from the golf course so I am really only taking 2 days of PTO”

      • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        There’s no way Musk “works” 100 hours a week. How do you think he’s found all this time to spend with his new bestie Donald? By all accounts the guy spends a significant amount of his time playing video games and on Twitter. His “work” is lunch meetings and zoom calls with the board where he just spitballs a bunch of nonsense.

    • Deway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      It doesn’t give the same feeling of power to the people in charge if they don’t see the drones workers sweat.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yup. It’s all about that sense of control. That’s what they’re paying for. I saw a quote from a survey of execuitives: “I don’t know if my employees are walking their dogs for 4 hours per day when they’re working from home, but I know they can’t walk their dog when they’re in the office”.

        Keep in mind, business execuitives are known to believe shit like, “when I go to the gym, that’s work, because I need to be healthy for the business”.

        They believe they own us. They believe they deserve to.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Office real estate.

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/adigaskell/2023/03/05/how-remote-work-has-affected-real-estate-values/

      This has had an understandable impact on office values, which fell considerably and remain below 2019. The author believes these valuations will remain below those levels for the next decade.

      Simulations of office values, that took into account remote work rates, show that the value of all NYC office properties dropped by more than 40% in 2020. Predictions for 10 years after the shift to working from home suggest that office values in 2029 will remain an average of 39% lower than they were in 2019.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    5 days ago

    Saying the quiet part out loud again.

    They believe that us not being forced to do what they want simply because they want it is a “privilege,” and one that they can and will just arbitrarily decree to be null and void.

    That says pretty much everything you meed to know about what they really think about everyone other than themselves.

    And ironically enough, what they think is that they themselves are privileged.

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Then they aren’t really about efficiency, are they? When properly set up, WFH for office work is very effective and efficient.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      6 days ago

      But think of the billions of dollars of now unused office space. That’s horrible for real estate pricing, which is where many of these fucks are invested.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s not even a real estate issue sometimes. I worked in an office in an industrial facility- printing custom boxes. Everyone in an office job was on a hybrid schedule. No one’s job required them to be at the office. All conversations were by Slack, all meetings were by Zoom even if we were all in the office. They could have knocked down the office space and put in at least two more industrial printers. Considering how backed up we got around Christmas, that would have helped them.

        Some of this is just old assholes who think people need to be in the office all the time so they can watch them or something. I don’t know.

        At least they didn’t make me wear a tie.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 days ago

          My last job was highly similar. It honestly would have been more tolerable (the stress) if I’d just been able to work from home… I mean it’s not the sort of job you could pretend to do if not being monitored, it was metric-driven and triggered by customer contact… so what’s the point?

          They said “we want to foster communication so having people in the office does that!” Umm my department is the only one in the company that is chained to our desk…? We can’t get up because we have to be available for contacts… and when people come by to talk to us, it’s usually a bad thing because they are interrupting actual real work. To top it off, our cube cell thing was right next to the door where everyone hung out waiting for each other to go to lunch, and because we were the only department that did external contact, they didn’t even think to shut the fuck up.

          I’ll never willingly work in an office again. Not just because my disability makes commuting difficult sometimes, but because the environment is just -bad-.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah, it’s miserable. I wasn’t kidding about the tie part either. Pretty much the only thing I liked about that job is that no one cared if I showed up in a T-shirt and sweatpants.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                It absolutely hasn’t from my own personal experience. Maybe it’s the industry you’re in, but I’m amazed you haven’t at least seen things like people on their lunch breaks outside or in a restaurant or whatever wearing a tie.

    • DankDingleberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      6 days ago

      they already said it themselves: “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome” so no, it was never about efficiency. at all.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        Don’t you love when someone from outside talks big shit pretending to know what YOUR job is and determining its not needed?

        Almost like firing people based on code written didn’t backfire last time…

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Agreed 100%. I used to work a hybrid schedule and I was much more efficient when I was at home and could be both relaxed and not distracted or annoyed by coworkers.

    • solomon42069@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Efficient for whom? The rich all have millions invested in commercial real estate so if it’s not about voluntary resignations it’s about that.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      They are about more efficiency in enriching themselves. Forcing people back into inefficient office-based work is just a tool to fire huge chunks of them while filtering for those easier exploited.

  • Gerprimus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    How many days do you think it will take until he calls for unions to be declared illegal?

    • Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s interesting they have multiple offices. Offices they’re already not in. If there was a time for a general strike it is forever ago.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Please!
      But oh no here come the liberals again to tell us how that would hurt the economy and people need to be able to buy stuff. And that this just still isn’t the right time to make a big fuss.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    6 days ago

    At least they’re open about it: The entire point (according to them) is attrition. The actual plan is to make work for these people much more hostile so they quit.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      6 days ago

      Do you think our tax bills will drop if they succeed in forcing these million employees to quit?

      They said they want to run the government like a business, and it looks like that’s what they’re pursuing. Unfortunately, that just means they’ll give us the lowest quality service at the highest possible price.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        6 days ago

        They said they want to run the government like a business,

        In other words: terribly. They want to run the government terribly, exactly how business runs in this country.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            They’ll spend all of their time changing the direction of what everyone is working on, hiring and firing people, and doing re-orgs…just like a real US business!