Summary

Trump’s popular vote share has fallen below 50% to 49.94%, with Kamala Harris at 48.26%, narrowing his margin of victory.

Trump’s share of the popular vote is lower than Biden’s in 2020 (51.3%), Obama’s in 2012 (51.1%) and 2008 (52.9%), George W. Bush’s in 2004 (50.7%), George H.W. Bush’s in 1988 (53.2%), Reagan’s in 1984 (58.8%) and 1980 (50.7%), and Carter’s in 1976 (50.1%).

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

The numbers also give Democrats a reason to push back on Trump’s mandate claims, noting most Americans did not vote for him.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    It’s a lack of majority not a lack of plurality. Harris is still trailing Trump by 3m votes or so (and 1.6%), Trump is just not above 50% after further votes have been counted. So this isn’t an electoral college steal

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, but even if Kamala wins the popular vote, this is going to be the closest a republican has gotten in…

      Decades?

      Maybe longer?

      But the DNC is going to latch onto this and try to claim if they had moved just a little more right they’d have won.

      Regardless of what happens, the DNC will always say the answer is moving to the right.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          They were told they abandoned workers, and somehow heard “What if we betray Transpeople?”

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Well at least they’re getting roasted for it, I mean in this link the aide who said that was fucking fired over it. Yeah it said he resigned, but when you get up enough you aren’t “fired” you’re “asked to resign”

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                20 minutes ago

                Oh no, you’re reading that wrong. The aide resigned in protest to Rep. Moulton’s comments. The article also quotes Rep. Tom Suozzi. Moulton is also in the House Equality Caucus, which is supposed to be protecting LGBTQ rights. I’m not sure how they square that with his comments that fundamentally misunderstand the process for transgender kids though. His comments show a fundamental misunderstanding of scholastic sports, human physiology, and hormone blockers. Which you think 2 of the 3 would be required reading for that caucus…

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          “Poor me, my constitutes don’t like that I am not representing them in government. Corporate lobbiest, you’ve done nothing but shower me in money, won’t you tell me what Americans really want?”

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Regardless of what happens, the DNC will always say the answer is moving to the right.

        This isn’t borne out by trending or statements. What kind of crystal ball are you smoking?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The kind that’s had me watching politics since Clinton… Have you been under a rock?

        • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Two examples: ran on being humane to migrants and continued title 42 three years into the Biden term and proposed a draconian new immigration law.

          Ran on reforming the police, flooded them with money.