• JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    California has many of laws on the books which grandfather workers under various statutes of de facto employment. Even contracts can be voided. No contract is necessary for an employment relationship to exist.

      • kru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a point in favor of reddit, but a small one. As my company’s labor lawyer enjoys saying, “You can’t contract around the law.” Meaning, an agreement can be nullified by a court that finds the agreement is in violation of a law.

        • GankTopPlz@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but you also can’t create a work agreement where one was explicitly denied. It’s like mowing your neighbors lawn then asking them to pay you, but they told you they wouldn’t pay you if you did it before you started. It’s the same with the 3rd party app devs too. While I think reddits actions are insane and detrimental to the health of the site, they are fully in their right to deny those devs access to their API and their site as a whole.

      • deejay4am@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It may surprise you to learn that if an EULA/TOS and an actual law conflict, then the law wins.

        Reddit can’t say “nuh-uh doesn’t count if you use our site!” anymore than someone can sign a contract saying it’s ok for you to murder them.

        So the real question is do any of these laws actually allow for the conditions set forth by Reddit to be considered employment?