• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    They also exclusively target lower to middle class areas because rich people have options, and the capitalist oligarchy love that poverty to cannon fodder pipeline.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Which is conveniently the real reason they are trying to ban abortion. Because poor kids without options are easy to recruit as cannon fodder

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I would imagine that behind closed doors, men in positions of power have had conversations about the potential recruits the military is losing with easy access to abortion, but I agree with you.

          For the most part there is no grand conspiracy, just passionate nuts who believe they’re going to live forever who found a shortcut to what they imagine is God’s approval. Like that nut who climbs buildings to raise awareness or whatever it is he’s doing. They believe when they die, they’ll wake up on a cloud and hear “Jesus Loves the Little Children” playing in the background. Their lord will walk up to them and embrace them, tell them what a good job they did shouting about saving babies as he pets their hair.

          I grew up in that world. So glad I don’t still live in it.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you’re still believing they’re religiously motivated you’re exactly where they want you.

      • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Also a huge reason the GOP is so against student debt forgiveness. Can’t give poor people an option beyond joining the military if they want to go to college.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I remember one of the ® Congress critters saying as much a few years ago, but I can’t find the source. I think it was one of their complete imbeciles.

      • gaifux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        So is the alternative to kill people in the womb based on the possibility they might end up joining the army at some point in their lives?

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The alternative is to not convince fools that fetuses are people just so that they’ll create more soldiers.

              • gaifux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                Oh ok. I noticed you didn’t answer. It’s not a trick question unless you’re a fool.

                • explodicle@local106.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s an intellectually dishonest question. You’re making a fool of yourself, this isn’t a debate.

                  • gaifux@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    How is it dishonest, fool? Your lack of comprehension doesn’t take the place of a logical refutation.

              • gaifux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yes, fertilization is indeed codifying this commitment to start a family. See, common ground!

                • Szyler@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Nowhere did I day fertilization is commitment.

                  If your condom breaks, you never intended to have a baby, thus not committed. If you find out you are pregnant a few weeks later after all and haven’t committed to having the baby, you consider your options and aport it if you don’t want to commit. If you find out you want to keep it, you don’t abort it and you have now made a commitment, and can’t abort it if you change your minds again a few months or years later.

                  • gaifux@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Sure, but commitments don’t ultimately change biology. After fertilization, you’re making the choice to snuff out a life or not.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If they truly cared about “all life” they would be pushing food programs for kids in schools, and persue free education.

          But educated children don’t end up in the military… Quick cut those programs!

          Republicans pull out a Bible and read whatever chapter slightly resembles the doctrine they want to push, and conveniently forget all the rest. And their voting base laps it up because they’ve never actually read a Bible themselves either.

          • gaifux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re right. We’re better off killing them in the womb to prevent any suffering they may have.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      They target a lot of wealthier neighborhoods as well. Lot of failsons that can’t get into a good college because of their shit grades, but a couple years in the army as an NCO means they can get into a decent school afterwards.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, there are special divisions for fortunate sons, who get fancier barracks and light duties away from harms way. We know because George W. Bush served his military career in one in the Coast Guard.