I got a lot of my headlines from reddit. Due to the impending death of my favorite app (Sync for Reddit) however, that’s coming to an end.

I’m now realising my Reddit experience had deteriorated slowly, just doomscrolling the hours away wasn’t healthy and I’m even kind of glad this is a good reason to end it. However, reddit has been really useful for news, especially the comments (taken with the right amount of skepticism) could be very informative.

I hope Lemmy builds something similar, but the defederation of beehaw’s news has been a setback.

What would be a good alternative, going forward, for getting news and backgrounds from varied, trustworthy en unbiased sources?

  • Cha0zz@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    1 year ago

    Maybe not directly an answer to your question but I don’t believe Reddit was a trustworthy and unbiased news source. Hell it wasn’t even that varied imo with news mainly being about what’s happening in the US with a focus on politics. Tbh I really don’t know what a good news source would be that thicks all your boxes.

      • Cha0zz@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Sure I agree with that. The problem is that the comments also often include statements without sources, plain out wrong information, etc. Much of which can also be highly upvoted. So even with the context of the comments finding unbiased good news requires you to be very sceptic and isn’t always straightforward. Additionally each subreddit has its own target audience which will also inherently result in some bias in both the news that is posted as the comments on said news. But tbh a perfectly unbiased news source probably does not exist as we are all human.

        • tegs_terry@feddit.ukEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          You’re right you gotta bring your bucket of salt for all them pinches, but it was often the case that if someone posted a bullshit answer there’d be a repudiation to it; if that one was bollocks? Someone else chimed in. Eventually you have enough to aggregate some semblance of the truth.

          The pitfall is relying on votes to do the vetting for you, and reluctance to research under your own power in lieu of citations. Cumbersome work, but if you really want the real picture it’s never 100% painless.

          • Ajen@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            I agree that there was generally a consensus in the comments, but that doesn’t mean the consensus was correct. Often, different subreddits would come to different conclusions. I think there is a big risk of falling in to the “conformation bias” trap when relying on community consensus.

            In not sure if there’s a better way to determine the truth, though.

          • Morningcoffee@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            I found it difficult to describe how exactly the comments were informing, sometimes even moreso than the article itself, but this is exactly it.

      • Soki@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        You install an RSS reader app on your phone or computer and subscribe to the feed links. Those contain some metadata for each story and a link to the content. The RSS reader will display everything in a readable way.

    • OFS_Razgriz@lemmy.worldEnglish
      01·
      1 year ago

      Both of them have truly neutral coverage, as in they report based on fact and reality and don’t limit what they write in order to maintain some false sense of neutrality. Many news sites nowadays play down objective fact in order to maintain “neutrality” between one side of the political spectrum that believes in evidence and statistical fact and one that expressly does not.

      This of course means that they’re seen as being “anti-Trump” or “anti-Republican” but in actuality it’s reality itself that is anti-Trump and they just report reality.

      • OrangeSlice@lemmy.mlMEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        I would caution against putting so much faith in them both so strongly. They both favor American establishment liberal politics, which is transparent to many due to the fact that a lot of Americans agree with those politics, and that they appear very reasonable in comparison to whatever tf Republicans are up to on a given day.

        It’s not a bad thing that they tend to have a very dry and straightforward tone, but all outlets are biased, and it’s important to remain critical at all times if you want to have an accurate picture of a current event.

        • OFS_Razgriz@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Oh fully agree, of course. Every once in a while I see a neoliberal dipshit in their opinion columns making some abhorrent take, but generally they’re significantly better than WaPo, NYT, CNN, Fox, CNBC, NBC, or CBS.

          Some other good ones are Reuters, Al Jazeera, and the Associated Press, which of course each come with their own set of biases as well. Reuters is also fairly establishment liberal, Al Jazeera is useless for any news about the Middle East, and AP’s opinion and analysis columns lean pretty conservative.

          My comment was more in the sense that a “neutral” news site is one where they do not suppress facts because those facts favor a perceived “side” of a debate, which is becoming increasingly common as major political parties in the US and abroad start pushing outright falsehoods in their rhetoric.

  • Radicalized@lemmy.oneEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    I use an app called Artifact that aggregates news from many sources into a FYP and categories. There’s even comments for each article.

  • Carlos de Grails@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    Just subscribe to RSS feeds from your new sites.

    I use InnoReader, which I prefer to Feedly. Syncs Free plan allows you up to 150 feeds and shows ads (which you can easily get around).

    • pandarisu@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I’m currently using Feedly. I subscribe to news outlets that I trust, and just read what I’m interested in there

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      I use Flym News Reader (Android app). It’s open source and you can find it on F-Droid and GitHub. It’s not updated anymore but it has the best combination of features (and I’ve tried a lot of RSS readers). You can easily add news sources because it has a built-in feed search (when you hit the “add feed” button). It can also import OPML feed collections.

    • TurboRotary@kbin.social
      1·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for suggestion Inoreader! I’ve just had a look and it looks great, in particular with their pre-made collections.

  • MeowKittyWow@kbin.social
    3·
    1 year ago

    Very interested in others folks answers. Honestly, I follow a lot of people on Mastodon who share news. I also follow hashtags for my local area (and here on threadiverse, subscribed to communities focused on my local area). This seems to work okay but isn’t quite the firehouse I’m used to.

  • lotanis@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    I’ve started using newsminimalist.com It’s one of the most useful LLM based services I’ve seen. It’s an aggregator that uses ChatGPT to identify the significance of stories and group the articles on different sites about that story together and then summarise them.

    I don’t want to spend hours every day reading news, but I do want to keep up to date with major events and it’s been good for that.

      • lotanis@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        No, because the primary purpose of the LLM is to choose among news stories on existing news sites and just group them together put them in order - not so much opportunity to make stuff up.

        It’s also doing summarisation, but that is something LLMs do pretty well and in that constrained way also don’t hallucinate (in my experience).

  • nivenkos@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s best to never read the news, you’ll find about stuff that actually affects you naturally anyway.

    Focus on communities for your hobbies and career instead.

    • lotanis@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I like to keep up to date enough on the things my government chooses to do so that I can make an informed choice the next time I vote.

    • Balssh@kbin.social
      2·
      1 year ago

      I’d argue that one should not stop reading the news forever because you’ll just become increasingly disconnected from what happens around you. As with all things, reading news in moderation and not doomscrolling is the way I think.

      • nivenkos@lemmy.world
        1·
        1 year ago

        But you naturally will hear about important stuff anyway or see it on headlines in the supermarket, etc.

        Like when the Ukraine war started, the Ukrainians and Russians had a flame-war on the company slack.

        And if we really were going to die by climate disaster, nuclear war, pandemics, etc. isn’t it better not to know until it happens anyway?

        You can’t spend your life worrying about things that will materialise decades from now, or are going on thousands of miles away. Focus on your own life and your own family and community.

    • lz0@kbin.social
      2·
      1 year ago

      I very actively followed news and politics a couple of years ago, and had been doing that for a long time. One day I just got completely fed up, and stopped. And holy shit, I’ve been so much happier and harmonious since then. Strongly recommend, 5/7

  • God@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    go to ground.news, they have news from both sides of the spectrum and label them as such and it’s kind of like a reddit for news?? world news specifically tho

    • Xeelee@kbin.social
      4·
      1 year ago

      While i like the idea on principle, I think they have a lot of bothsideism on their site. Dividing everything into “left” or “right” is not a really valid approach.

  • Sphere@reddthat.comEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    For tech news, you can try techmeme.com, Hacker News and ycombinator. For general world news, I’m subscribed to TLDR News on Nebula and also check some local outlets websites directly. A few offer RSS which can be useful though that will vary by location.

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.oneEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    The context I got from reddit comment threads was invaluable. I hope to find something similar in the federated wilderness.

  • ramesdunc@feddit.nlEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    I like brutalist.report.

    It shows the headlines of many news sites in a clean way: just text links. It also has filters for tech, science, politics, etc.

    Edit:typo

  • tallwookie@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    no source is truly unbiased, but I am also curious about where to find news/worldnews - there’s a few non-beehaw options but they’re not updated that often.

    for tech stuff I always default to arstech, cnet, and slashdot, but I honestly dont feel like navigating between all of the various disparate news websites on a daily basis - or even a weekly basis to be honest.

  • mcc@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    31·
    1 year ago

    Check out ground news. It is a news aggregator, but with a twist: it aggregates all articles on the same event from various sites so you can see how the event is portrayed by different sites.