You must log in or # to comment.
Reasonable take. Seems better to switch now than continuing the centuries long tradition of exploiting Canada’s wildlife for their furs.
They still need to cull the bears though. Is it not better to use the fur for something?
Is there any reason why it can’t just be faux fur?
Not that I’m a massive fan of killing bears or anything, nor am i a massive fan of the royals, or war — so I’m only saying this in the interests of discussion: but would making tiny black plastic fur even be better for the environment in the long term?
The best thing for the environment in the long term would be to cull about 60% of humanity, can’t separate trash enough to beat that. That can’t be the only argument for whether something is good.
Personally I’d take a tiny amount of pollution in exchange for the cruelty.
They could just not wear silly hats.
“We could make hats out of them.” they selflessly proclaimed assuming they are in the other 40%
Jesus Christ the lengths some would go to… redistribution of wealth and ending dependence on oil, monocultures, and factory farming is right there.
I’d have said 80%
I am on the fence about this subject. On one hand I would like to see a world someday where we don’t need to kill animals for food or fur. On the other hand, we haven’t yet found environmentally friendly material replacements for some of these applications. I hear on the news about things like pineapple leather and mango fur, but I have yet to see them used in something practical that would help reduce the use of animal products. Like sure, I can buy a purse, but when will there be an alternative for car seats or shoes that isn’t made of plastic. I really hope someone out there is working on a solution, but until then I’m really not sure which is worse. Fake fur hats will just add to the piles of plastic like everything else :/
SCOBYs (Symbiotic Cultures of Bacteria and Yeast) could have some possible applications as fake leather but I don’t know if anyone is working on it or if it could actually be made strong enough.
One example where we just do not have an equivalent is motorcycle gear. Yeah we have textile jackets, and I have one because where I am the risk of heat stroke in a leather jacket is more of a concern, but if you want abrasion resistance, leather is the best you can get. Can SCOBYs compete with that? I don’t know.
liberals hearing about ‘faux fur’
liberals hearing about ‘microplastics’
They’re the same thing
“Tradition is never an excuse for cruelty,” says Mr Fry, who is narrating a video which shows undercover film of how black bears are killed.
A supporter of the animal welfare group made an undercover video which claims to show hunters putting down buckets of strongly-scented food as bait, and then shooting black bears with crossbow bolts when they approach.
This doesn’t exactly seem like a revelation to me, and I don’t know why you’d need undercover footage… how do you think they hunted bears?
Living their life in nature before being killed is about as good as it gets for animals. I thought they were gonna say they’re caged from birth or something.
Besides a POV of “killing any animal is wrong”, I don’t really see an issue. It appears to be regulated and as long as they’re maintaining the bear population appropriately why is it any different than hunting deer or killing a cow for leather?
I think it would be a good thing if they moved away from real bear fur for an alternative, but don’t see it as a real issue either way tbh.
The problem is that wild animals are being killed so an unelected king in a democratic country can have his guards wear fancy hats
I’d like the monarchy abolished as well tbh, but their hats are towards the bottom of the list of reasons why.
That’s also not gonna be Stephen Fry’s point, as good as he can be about some issues he’s also a known monarchist.
an unelected king
Are kings ever elected? Like, what’s an example of an elected king? 😅
Maybe surprising, but yes. The pope is an example. Historically it was not super uncommon, nowadays Malaysia and Cambodia for instance still have an elected monarch.
And in the context of the UK?
Oh it is completely irrelevant for Fry’s point. Just thought it was interesting.
Fair enough.
Chances are (and I’m up for being corrected on this). The bears are being culled to maintain population levels.
In all areas of the world, human interaction with nature means we’ve upset the usual ecosystem balance. We’ve moved predator/prey ecosystems, we’ve changed their sizes and we’ve decided there are big areas we just don’t want the predators. Culling/management is necessary to minimise our further impact.
These bears are going to be shot with or without the furs being used. They’re not being killed so someone can have the fancy hats.
Freedom of information act requests have revealed that the UK government does not know the details of the supply chain for the fur it buys, as MP John Nicolson pointed out during the debate:
“The evidence is that most bears in Canada are killed by trophy hunters who know there is a market for the skins. Canadian Government culls are infrequent and only authorised to kill the small number of bears straying too close to human habitation. The MoD has no idea about the provenance of the dead bears it buys. The evidence, again, is that they are often nursing mothers. When they are killed to make a hat, their cubs starve to death.”
Canadian bear hunt policies are largely economically driven, despite many questioning the financial benefits over ecotourism investments. Black bear hunting trips cost thousands of dollars and, since the Government of Ontario has reintroduced the spring bear hunt, non-resident trophy hunters are paying to bait and kill bears for sport as they emerge from hibernation. Rather than being a by-product of wildlife management, bear pelts from Canada mostly come from recreational hunts.
This doesn’t exactly seem like a revelation to me, and I don’t know why you’d need undercover footage… how do you think they hunted bears?
Because most people don’t think about it. Video is a good way to get them started.
how do you think they hunted bears?
With guns tbh
Besides a POV of “killing any animal is wrong”, I don’t really see an issue. It appears to be regulated and as long as they’re maintaining the bear population appropriately why is it any different than hunting deer or killing a cow for leather?
It may be because deer and cows are used for meat as well as their hide.
I’m not sure what happens to the rest of the bear.
Not sure what happens to these bears but I know many Canadian hunters eat bear.
People do eat bear meat. I’m sure some just skin it and leave it but it is plenty edible.
True, if it’s wasteful then move away from it, but then again maybe there does need to be intervention to maintain bear population anyway.
Come on King Charles, get with it. Bear fur is passé. It took me like 5 seconds of searching the web to find a perfectly suitable replacement: https://www.etsy.com/listing/914324031/mallard-duck-hat
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“Tradition is never an excuse for cruelty,” says Mr Fry, who is narrating a video which shows undercover film of how black bears are killed.
Tall black bearskin hats are a familiar sight at ceremonial military events, such as the Changing of the Guard outside Buckingham Palace.
A supporter of the animal welfare group made an undercover video which claims to show hunters putting down buckets of strongly-scented food as bait, and then shooting black bears with crossbow bolts when they approach.
“By continuing to purchase caps made of black bear fur, the UK government drives demand for pelts and effectively incentivises hunters,” says Mr Fry.
PETA says it will share the video footage with King Charles, as it asks him to support a switch from real to artificial fur.
But a Ministry of Defence spokeswoman says that its bear pelts are sourced from authorised hunts and a regulated Canadian fur market: “To date and to the department’s knowledge, an alternative has yet to meet the standards required to provide an effective replacement for the bearskin ceremonial caps.”
The original article contains 475 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is a psychological and propaganda operation. The real agenda is to destroy Russia: they’re attacking it from its æsthetics and drip.
No fur = No Russia (or at least, nothing worthy of being called Russia)
