• 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s 100k for those in the back. Really puts this greed into perspective, there is absolutely no reason for any individual to be hoarding this much money. For many people that would literally be life changing

      • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you want to stretch it a little further, this would be enough to very comfortably support just shy of 74,000 students in Australia per year.

        That’s roughly an extra third of what our government offers right now.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is exactly why you do a progressive tax rate that charges a huge percent (50+) for every penny earned over 20 million.

      They can still get these massive bonuses, but get would be better off putting that money into wages that aren’t taxed so much.

      • overcast5348@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        50% for 20 million sounds insane to me. I’d be clamoring for 75% or more. I’m in Ontario and people making something like 250000 CAD already have a marginal rate above 50% IIRC. Before anyone calls me a lazy commie, my marginal rate is in the mid 40s already, and I’m happy to do my part.

      • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh honey, that’s so much more conservative than I’d tax. 100% over a million, easy.

        They don’t deserve huge bonuses so I’m not interested in letting them keep anything that insane. There should be a cap on income based upon the median wage or something IMO.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          None of these people earn their fortunes in a way that is affected by income tax.

          They’re not taking billions in cold hard cash every year.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s probably not bad when you factor in healthcare. Especially the middle class that doesn’t get free healthcare but also pays the same as the super wealthy.

    • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Anybody else think there should be a money limit? Like at a certain point you get a message: Congratulations, you completed capitalism. Now every additional cent you make is going to be taxed at 100%