• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is exactly why you do a progressive tax rate that charges a huge percent (50+) for every penny earned over 20 million.

    They can still get these massive bonuses, but get would be better off putting that money into wages that aren’t taxed so much.

    • overcast5348@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      50% for 20 million sounds insane to me. I’d be clamoring for 75% or more. I’m in Ontario and people making something like 250000 CAD already have a marginal rate above 50% IIRC. Before anyone calls me a lazy commie, my marginal rate is in the mid 40s already, and I’m happy to do my part.

    • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh honey, that’s so much more conservative than I’d tax. 100% over a million, easy.

      They don’t deserve huge bonuses so I’m not interested in letting them keep anything that insane. There should be a cap on income based upon the median wage or something IMO.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        None of these people earn their fortunes in a way that is affected by income tax.

        They’re not taking billions in cold hard cash every year.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s probably not bad when you factor in healthcare. Especially the middle class that doesn’t get free healthcare but also pays the same as the super wealthy.