I’m aware that Session has been discussed twice before on this community, but the last thread was 6 months old so excuse my starting a new one.

There’s one big concern I wanted to bring up, which is the disagreements over whether it has forward secrecy. The spec says it does, but I’ve found two other sources saying it doesn’t:

https://restoreprivacy.com/secure-encrypted-messaging-apps/session/ (search for “Perfect Forward Secrecy removed”) https://www.securemessagingapps.com

Why are they saying this? Is there a critical caveat to Session’s forward secrecy (does it not have it in closed groups?), or are both sources just wrong?

(I’ve also heard one source say its closed groups are limited to 10 members which would be a showstopper for me and another source say they’re limited to 100 and the spec says 500 so i don’t know what to believe.)

I’m also concerned about it being built on top of a blockchain and cryptocurrency, not because I’m suspicious of cryptocurrency in general but because I find it difficult to understand, and because that it costs thousands of dollars to run a Session node seems to me like the network is bound to be owned exclusively by a few rich companies and investors. Is it? Is there a place I can see who owns how much of it, particularly how much is owned by the Oxen developers?

UPDATE: I believe I’ve just learned that Sesison DOES NOT have forward secrecy or deniability; the whitepaper linked on their CURRENT website is outdated. https://getsession.org/blog/session-protocol-technical-information

    • Yujiri@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      The freedom to not have your money controlled by state and/or capitalist institutions such as banks and payment processors. This is actually a huge deal IMO. With traditional fiat currency, you are completely at the mercy of every financial institution you deal with - your bank account can be closed or locked or your money seized by the government, and every time you buy anything with a bank card you’re really giving the merchant full access to all your money and just hoping they don’t abuse it. And they do. Who hasn’t had experiences having illegitimate charges appear in your account history, struggling to figure out how to cancel a subscription before the corporation charges you again without consent, or charged more money at a store than you were told it would be and not realizing it until it was too late? Cryptocurrency has issues, but the fact that it gives you control of your own money is very important to me.

      • sexy_peach@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        The same thing is true with cryptocurrency though? Most people have their cryptobucks at a wallet that sits at an exchange? Which then has the same drawbacks as a bank.

        • Yujiri@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          I don’t know if it’s true that “most people” have their cryptobucks in custodial wallets, but the point of cryptocurrency is that you don’t need to do that. You can pay online using a wallet you control (and I have done so), which is impossible with traditional currency.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            What cryptocurrency that’s properly decentralized can handle enough transactions for it to be useful?

            I think having democratic control (via the state) over the money is pretty important. Also cash has a lot of advantages as well.

            • Yujiri@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              The state is the greatest enemy of human freedom and peace, so I will withdraw from this thread.

                • Yujiri@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Of course, I am an anarchist! Though I am curious what distinction you’re drawing between states and governments.

                  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    I think that a local government of people who are appointed by the people to do something specific would be viable in an anarchist society. To me the point is that these people can’t make broad decisions on their own, they have to be sent with an assignment.