• Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “I beseech you to control him if you can,” [Judge] Engoron said. “If you can’t, I will. I will excuse him and draw every negative inference that I can.”

    Ultra-mega-fucked.

    Trump attorney Alina Habba at one point stood up and argued that the judge was there to listen to what Trump had to say. “I am not here to listen to what he has to say!” Engoron reportedly shouted, telling Trump’s counsel to sit back down. “We are here to hear him answer questions,” he added.

    LMAO at a bottom tier lawyer trying to tell a judge how to do their job.

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, Judge Engoran has 20 years of experience being a judge, and he was a practicing lawyer before that. He was a judge before Habba got her license, and he’s probably more than double her overall experience.

      The fact that she didn’t even know that witness testimony means answering questions really puts a big question mark over her 13 years, anyways.

      • constantokra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I have to say, none of that means shit if he lets the guy run all over him and do whatever he likes with no consequences. Most people can’t piss a judge off that much without spending time in jail.

        • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          11 months ago

          Watch the proceedings of that “sovereign citizen” idiot Darrell Brooks who drove a car into a Christmas parade in Wisconsin. That guy never heard the phrase “just shut the fuck up”. It’s so maddening to watch that insolent manchild, I couldn’t make it past two minutes of footage.

        • Afghaniscran@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I feel like I have to clarify that I’m not American before making comments so there’s enough wiggle room for potential ignorance.

          I think it probably is a tactic he is using so that when it’s time for consequences, there’s plenty of leeway given to trump to show that he wasn’t acting biased, it’s just that trump is a fucking moron that can’t shut up, when the lunatics decide to shout about it.

          • constantokra@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s possible. People literally get years added to their sentences for back talking judges. You are simply not allowed to derail a trial even a little bit, and the consequences for attempting it are swift and harsh. For anyone else.

            I’m so tired of this fuckwit’s behavior, but i’m even more angry that at every turn people have had the ability to stop that behavior and haven’t. And now we’re here. Anyone else would be immediately taken to jail for the stuff he’s doing inside the courtroom and out and he’s still not stopped.

            It’s a mockery, and if the courts can’t handle this guy they have no business ruining people’s lives for things that don’t compare to anything trump has done.

            • Syringe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              if the courts can’t handle this guy they have no business ruining people’s lives for things that don’t compare to anything trump has done.

              I’ve been looking for the right words to say this, so thanks.

              The justice system has failed if it’s able systematically arrest people in parts of new York, Baltimore, and Chicago, but can’t do anything to this clown for a literal attempt to overthrow the government and constitution.

              Wild.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The fact that she didn’t even know that witness testimony means answering questions really puts a big question mark over her 13 years, anyways.

        I know that and my legal expertise is just what I’ve picked up over the course of my life. No law degree or anything. The fact that I might be more qualified to be a lawyer than Habba is bad news for Trump. (For the record, you do NOT want me representing you in court. Get a real lawyer, not some guy whose best qualification is “knows more than a Trump lawyer.”)

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      One of the most important rules when doing anything in a courtroom: don’t piss off the judge.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Trump: “So what I’m hearing is that I should yell at the judge and insult him from the stand. Got it.”

        (Yes, he did just that.)

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      She was also complaining, after court, that the judge was telling her what to do and she doesn’t stand for that in her life.

      Um, you do when you’re in the court. If the judge tells you to shut up, you shut up. You can be offended that the judge told you to shut up, but you’d better not argue with the judge and tell them that you have a right to say whatever you want to say in their court. Not unless you want to spend a night in a jail cell.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And this is exactly how they will fuel their appeal. He will say the judge was unwilling to listen to his testimony, and use that quote as evidence.

      • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That appeal would be quickly denied. The Judge is absolutely right: They “are here to hear him answer questions”, not “to listen to what he has to say.” The Judge has a responsibility to keep testimony responsive to the questions asked and relevant to the case, not to let witnesses give monologues about whatever nonsense is running through their heads at the moment.