• Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was a long time pirate back in the day, and thinking of sailing once again. However all my old booty spots are gone. What is Jellyfin?

      • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        11 months ago

        A great UI to stream your movie files from your TV. A bit like Plex, but open source.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Tbh JF is faaaaaaaar from a ‘great UI’, it suffers from the ‘open source design’ of developers who have no idea how to design a good UI as the designers for the UI. I shouldn’t need to click vaguely in the direction of where I think the X (close) button is to make it appear in the first place. The settings for a user should be in the same location as the admin settings. The main screen shouldn’t look like it came straight out of 2000, it should have the categories all visible by default, it should be easier to setup https (plex was WAY easier in this regard), ota channel guides shouldn’t be outsourced to a paid project, there is no built-in import/export (I recently moved to a docker image and found that out, yay)…

          It ‘works’, but fuck me it’s so rough around the edges that it draws blood. Plex has issues (downloading content from a server is wonky, metadata can grab the wrong movies, paid sub/lifetime etc) but it’s so, so, so much closer to what an all-in-one media platform should be, imo.

          • cantsurf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m not arguing that any of your complaints are invalid. I just want to say that I use jellyfin to organize my movies and TV shows and access them from other computers on my home network. It works, is easy, was free. I like it.

            • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, there’s a reason I keep it installed and at the ready, but it’s just less user-friendly and that is essential when my users aren’t tech savvy, they just want things to ‘work’. If JF reaches feature parity I’ll migrate my users, but I can’t be asked to explain why they need to pay a monthly fee for ota guides or why everything looks different, if I also need to explain that features are missing and why can’t I move their watch history. It’s got to be easy for them, but also for me too.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve found that most FOSS projects just have a “for us, by us” mentality where nobody cares about making things easy to use to the point that it’s not even possible if you’re not an experienced coder AND have strong knowledge of networking.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s because it’s a fork of Emby from 13+ years ago, still running 90% of that old code. They’ve kept it functional, that’s about it.

            If you want something that’s actually still being developed/improved look to Emby or Plex. Emby is more focused on ‘personal’ media servers with your own content and users under your own control; plex is more focused on cloud services, integrating content they can run advertising on and requiring your users to authenticate through their public servers to be able to access your local/private server.

              • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Emby used to be entirely open source, it’s free to use the base product (server software and the built in web browser based app) but requires a license for the installable apps and some server features so that the developers have some income from their work and incentive to keep spending their time+efforts on it.

                Some people don’t like paying others for their hard work so they’d regularly fork Emby as it releases updates so they could remove those paywalls.

                Unwilling to continue supporting this, Emby went closed source so their work could no longer be stolen. Jellyfin is the final fork of emby before it officially closed its source code. They have since kept it running, but have made little to no improvements or changes beyond that.

            • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ve had plex running on my nas for 6+ years now, and have it set to where all the cloud stuff is available but out of the way, as I have a small collection so I don’t need to lean into the cloud streaming. I remember trying Emby in my evaluation of Plex, but as I recall the UI was bleh and it too followed a paid model. I know of Kodi but I haven’t looked into it in a long time, and I never ended up actually trying it.

              Plex is fine for my needs, but I decided to get setup with JF just ‘in case’ plex takes a sharp new direction or something (I’ve had it installed since the whole ‘watch stuff free with ads’ kicked off), so if/when I can just be like ‘hey all plex did [stupid thing] so I just need you all to uninstall plex, grab this jellyfin app, and login with [credentials] and we will be all set’.

            • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I use Plex for music because it is very good there, but Jellyfin for movies/tv which I like more for that kind of content.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not to mention the setup for hardware encoding which basically expects deep knowledge of the matter to even get it to run, let alone run well. Plex on the other hand hides it behind a license but it JUST WORKS, there’s no setup or anything.

            I really wanted to use Jellyfin, but there’s just too many pain points

      • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Tbh, all you need nowadays for most stuff is a VPN , Qbittorrent and 1337x.to

        Download speeds are such that a 1.5gb film takes about a minute to download (in Europe, not sure about third world countries lol)

        If you need something more obscure, look up how to add the search engine to Qbittorrent

        • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I highly discourage 1337x. They got caught not banning a user who intentionally uploaded malware. Forgive the reddit link, but there aren’t a lot of piracy news sites.

          • dlpkl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Realdebrid just finds the torrents for you though, right? You’d still need a VPN since you’re technically downloading the movie to watch it. I know a lot of ISPs send notices if you torrent a copyrighted movie

            • nieceandtows@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Nope. It also downloads the torrent for you and gives you download link or stream link to the video. Most of the time, the torrent is already on their cache, so it’s instantly available to you.

                • nieceandtows@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  They’re more like a private storage server. You can’t see what movies they have. Technically you can only download what you ‘add’ there, but they cache everybody else’s downloads too, so your download is readily available. I’m not sure of all technicalities, but there are a few different debrid services, so there must be some way they are able to do this.

      • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m like you, hadn’t pirated outside of games since early 2000s and just started again. Wait until you see the shit we have now, it’s mind-blowing how far it’s come.

        And with Jellyfin if you have the upload speeds you can even host for family etc, so anyone sharing your Netflix now can just login to your Jellyfin server, for them it will be a comparable experience.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Pirating games is basically unheard of for me, unless it’s a product not readily available on a modern storefront.

          Nintendo has a problem with me playing Pokemon Omega Ruby on a 3DS emulator? they are free to offer a switch version.

          This is because steam is not an asshole, which is a big reason why I kind of got disappointed when they stopped offering movies. I like having those on the same platform

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Do you need to set up a VPN for doing that? Or can they just log in straight up?

          • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m still maining plex, and at least there, they just create a plex account, you grant access to that account, and that’s it. Don’t even have to open ports. My guess is with JF since there isn’t a central account host, you’d probably have expose some ports on your network to be able to login without a VPN.

          • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            They can just log straight in, there is an android app or they can even login via a browser

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Nevermind that shit, Stremio + Torrentio + Real-Debrid. I’m fucking done with these greedy-ass companies. I was paying Netflix, Amazon, Disney, Apple, Paramount , MLB.tv and HBO, and pretty content to do so, and they all continually removed content and adjusted their pricing to reduce what I was getting for my money. They finally pushed me beyond my tolerance limit a few months ago and I’ve been back to sailing the high seas for the first time in 20 years.

        I have more content now, all at acceptable quality options, all with good subtitles instead of the mess HBO was, and all on the same platform instead of having to jump between 7 different apps. I’m done with them and I’ll stay done with them until they pull their heads out of their asses.

        Edit: if you get a cheap computer, a Chromecast, a FireTV, or what I have - an Nvidia Shield TV, then you get even get a nifty remote controller and a good standard browsing platform for everything.

        • chilburn06@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just set this up on a cheap Onn 4k box from Walmart. Works fantastic. Also setup the Trakt integration to keep up with what I watch across multiple devices.

      • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s now a whole ecosystem of applications to streamline the download of series (sonarr) and movies (radarr) using torrents or Usenet (prowlarr). Pair those with a good player like Jellyfin or Plex and you have a nice media center that for sure won’t stop working everytime your family tries to watch a movie…

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Facts. I run both but JF is not ‘family-ready’ and thus sits on my server, receiving updates and idling until that changes. Plex took 5 minutes of explaining and the folks have been happily using it for a few years now.

        • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah buncha haters in here but you’re right.

          Personally I prefer Apple TV and infuse.

        • dlpkl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          But it’s totally free. You don’t need app unlocks, you can have as many devices as you want, and you can hardware transcode without paying for premium.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Paid ~$100 for the lifetime license 9 years ago. So less than 93 pennies a month.

            Throughout that time Emby has constantly been developed bringing bug fixes, UI improvements, and new features; while also providing excellent support as needed on the forums.

            TBH I think I’ve vastly underpaid and plan to donate to the project shortly.

            In that same time, I’ve seen very few meaningful updates to jellyfin. Just scrolling through their changelogs it’s mostly filled with:

            New Features and Major Improvements

            N/A

            Release Notes

            N/A

    • Lupec@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Add the *arr apps into the mix and you get super low effort pirating, legit changed my life when I set it all up lol

        • Lupec@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ah, my bad. I’m so used to it all that I can’t help but spit out jargon with no context sometimes 😅

          I’m referring to apps like Sonarr, which basically keeps an eye on torrent/usenet providers and downloads episodes for you automatically. So you tell it you want some show, optionally set the quality you want it at, and it takes care of everything so that the episodes just show up on Jellyfin/Plex after they air and it grabs them. There’s also Radarr for movies and a whole bunch of related ones.

          • errer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Just make sure you use a VPN so you don’t get a nasty DMCA notice from your ISP.

            • Lupec@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Pretty much the one upside of living where I do is ISPs couldn’t care less haha

              Appreciate the heads-up anyway, very much relevant to a good portion of the folks who might stumble upon my comment :)

        • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They’re small services that you load your libraries into, and select content you want to get and the quality of that content. Then the service goes out and finds the torrents for you and adds them to your library.

          https://wiki.servarr.com/

    • Quills@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Piracy is growing back!? How?? We had prattically killed it with our optimal services haven’t we??”

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        You know, I can actually see this happening and them not understanding why its climbing. I’m sure you could make a great comedy sketch out of it.

        • rockandsock@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          People often have a hard time understanding things when their paycheck depends on them not understanding those things.

    • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      like retail suddenly writing off large chunks to ‘theft’ coinciding with move to self checkout. surprise

  • LillyPip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember when HBO’s entire point was you paid for cable so you wouldn’t have ads. That was their business model.

    Then sometime in the late 80s or early 90s (I dunno, that decade’s kind of a blur) they started sneaking ads in between shows, but not in the middle of shows. But you were paying a higher price, with a few ads. Then they started showing ads to everyone, and still making you pay. I’m still salty about that.

    This was always going to happen. They’ll compound paying PLUS ads, and you’ll like it, because what choice do you have if all services are doing it?

    Fuck them all . 🏴‍☠️

    e: massively borked that first sentence

    • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      in Australia that was the whole selling point of foxtel when it launched. these days it has more ads than free to air TV and still costs like $60 a month for the basic package. most people only use it for sport

    • nephs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Paying customers attention is so fucking valuable. People pay for something, maybe if we add ads they will pay for more things!

      And most people are surprisingly not bothered by ads. So… Just criminalise the people that are, and there you go, infinite money making machine.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        In the early days they didn’t; that was the whole point of them. You paid a subscription specifically not to have ads like free broadcast television did.

        It only lasted like a decade, but it was their whole selling point.

        e: keep in mind, too, that broadcast tv at the time was where all the good content was. HBO only showed movies that had already been in theatres (thus the name Home Box Office) and Showtime’s hook was soft-core porn. (‘Do your parents have Showtime?’ was sleepover code for ‘can we watch kinda-porn after the ‘rents have gone to sleep?’) There wasn’t the dearth of original shows/movies we have now. They weren’t studios back then.

        e2: sorry for multiple edits, but also bear in mind that when HBO first came out, people were watching their content on televisions like this, which was so inferior to movie theatres that ‘it’s in your home advertising free!’ was basically their whole selling point at first.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s a false belief that keeps getting spread, cable TV started as the same channels with clear reception instead of having to rely on antennas, so no people didn’t pay not to have ads, they paid to be able to have a good reception of the same channels then had access to for free with bad reception, then some exclusive channels started appearing without commercials, but it wasn’t the norm.

          https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/s/7wxRbKq9Dj

          And it’s funny that you’re talking about “the early days” since it started in 1948 and I’m willing to bet that you weren’t born.

          • LillyPip@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I mean, I’m not going off a belief, I actually lived this.

            Yes, the clear reception vs bunny ears was awesome, but that was also limited on televisions like this, and I’m talking specifically about the content.

            My family were always early adopters of technology (I started gaming in ‘79 with both the Intellivision and Atari – Intellivision was far superior). We had HBO, Cinemax, and Showtime as soon as they were available.

            I’m talking about the late 70s and early 80s when they were commercially available to the masses and the cable wars began.

            The late 70s were absolutely the early days of commercial cable tv.

            • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              I mean, I’m not going off a belief, I actually lived this.

              Yes, the clear reception vs bunny ears was awesome, but that was also limited on televisions like this, and I’m talking specifically about the content.

              I’m talking about the late 70s and early 80s when they were commercially available to the masses and the cable wars began.

              The late 70s were absolutely the early days of commercial cable tv.

              This is my recollection as well; I was a young adult at the time.

              Cable was ABSOLUTELY supposed to be ad-free. Ad-free, and local access so that anyone could have their own show. That was the tradeoff to get people away from the big three (ABC, CBS, NBC) at the time. There were literally no ads.

              But it didn’t last long at all. Local stayed ad-free for much longer; anything national came with ads embedded. Even the very first day of MTV had ads.

              And before anyone screeches at me about what link said what, forget it. I’m not interested in reading text about how the 60s and 70s were supposed to have taken place written by people don’t even know what it means to unplug or hang up a phone, or why anyone would even do that, or what green stamps were, or what happens when you lie on the floor with your head between two speakers listening to Pink Floyd, lol.

              LillyPip is factually correct. You should be listening to them instead of trying to retcon history for them.

              • LillyPip@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                or what happens when you lie on the floor with your head between two speakers listening to Pink Floyd.

                I’d forgotten how much I should miss this.

                e: also

                Ad-free, and local access

                This is what made Bob Ross a thing in the early 80s.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                And before anyone screeches at me about what link said what, forget it. I'm not interested in reading text about how the 60s and 70s were supposed to have taken place

                Check any sources on cable TV history, it’s all the same. Just because you decide to ignore it doesn’t make it false, it just proves your ignorance.

                Here, since you “don’t want to read”, this one has a nice graphic that should make it easy for your brain ☺️

                https://www.cablecompare.com/blog/the-complete-history-of-cable-tv

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              The late 70s were absolutely the early days of commercial cable tv.

              I provided a source with more sources, no it wasn’t.

              Need more? There:

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_television_in_the_United_States

              First phrase: Cable television first became available in the United States in 1948.

              The majority of channels has commercials, the ones you paid extra for (like HBO) didn’t, they weren’t the majority and the point of paying for cable wasn’t too remove ads, you still had them on the majority of the channels because they were the same as what you got with antennas.

              You’re not the only one who lived it buddy, you just don’t remember it properly.

              • LillyPip@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                How old are you?

                I don’t need links to tell me what this was like when I vividly remember.

                Yea, cable television first became available in 1948. Regular middle class families did not have cable television for a long time after that.

                Mobile phone service was available in 1959. Guess how many people had it? A good friend of my family had a car phone in the mid 70s. Guess how common that was?

                You can’t go by invention dates on stuff like this. You’ll be amazed at how long some things take to gain market acceptance.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  So far I’m the only one providing sources, an anecdote of when you were a kid isn’t reliable.

                  The majority of channels had ads because, again, they were just the same channels as without cable. Cable exclusive channels weren’t a thing before 1970 (when there’s was 10m subscribers already) and ads on a cable exclusive channel first started in 1977 with nearly all of them having ads in the in the 80s.

                  7 years of commercial free cable exclusive channels that were a minority of channels available at the time. No, people weren’t paying not to see adverts and no it wasn’t the point of cable TV like you said, the point of creating cable TV was to allow people to reliably watch TV by broadcasting the signal in a way that wasn’t affected by all sorts of elements out of the control of the broadcasters.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, because the majority of TV channels you got when getting cable weren’t cable exclusive, cable exclusive appeared in 1972 (24 years after the introduction of cable broadcasting) and in 1977 came the first cable exclusive channel with ads.

          People saying “not having ads was the point of cable” are wrong since not having ads on all the cable exclusive channels was a thing for 5 years and only happened after cable already had a good fooothold in the market.

          • bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You’ve already changed the goal posts. Your initial claim was that most cable networks had ads, and now you’ve walked that entirely back to “well there existed one channel that had ads”

            But also the original comment was they were old enough to remember it

            And if you look at this timeline: https://www.computertechreviews.com/a-brief-history-of-cable-tv-commercials/

            It lines up pretty well with their claims of when ads were during the viewing experience.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I didn’t move the goal post, most of the channels you got access to when subscribing to cable were the same channels you had access to without cable and they had ads, a minority of channels, starting in 72 with HBO, which was the first cable exclusive channel, didn’t have them but in 77 the trend reversed.

              That’s 5 years without ads on a minority of channels you could watch and people speak like all cable was ad free and like that was the whole point of it. Well, no, the whole point was to get TV to people who didn’t have good reception and the people in setting with ignore the 24 years of cable TV that came before 1972 and the 46 years since 1977.

  • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    11 months ago

    So right after I signed up at the beginning of this year, they switched from HBOMax to “Max.” I paid for a year in advance, and of course when I signed up there was nothing about them switching to a new brand. All of a sudden it was full of trash reality shows and ID Discovery true crime. I have no idea what possessed them to do that.

    Then once it switched over I stopped being able to stream any new HBO shows on mobile and customer service won’t refund me any amount. Not that I can even communicate with them effectively. It’s all “chat” with AI or people who have no idea what I’m saying. Half the shows still won’t play on mobile for me.

    TL;DR I paid for a year of HBO. They changed their selection a few months in. I lost mobile access to a bunch of their shows. And now I’m losing even more features before the year is up. That’s quite literally not what I paid for.

    How exactly is any of that legal? Genuine question. What about the Federal Trade Commission? Isn’t there fucking anybody regulating these corporations in the US?

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      How exactly is any of that legal? Genuine question. What about the Federal Trade Commission? Isn’t there fucking anybody regulating these corporations in the US?

      There are government websites you can report this to, though I do not know what effect that will have.

      IANAL, but my understanding is that if you paid for a year for a certain set of services they have to give you those services for the whole year, or refund you your money.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        They also likely claimed during the merger that it wouldn’t effect customers. Of course we knew that was a lie.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Until each and every one of us reading this commits to expending the energy, and sacrificing the leisure time, to actually pursue what small options we have, this is only going to get worse.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That, and voting into office people that’ll actually write regulation laws to curb these bad behaviors from corporations.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ask them for a refund, in writing, document everything, and if they refuse, take it to your state’s AG office. Obviously I can’t speak for every state, but mine has slapped around whirlpool when they refused to fix a defective fridge, dell when they refused to replace a monitor with dead pixels, etc. I’ve never had a bad experience. It’s amazing how a letter from your local AG’s office will suddenly make companies be less shitty to you.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What we really need is an instance of GPT-4 trained on every court case in history as well as Ralph Nader, Noam Chomsky, Clark Howard, Rosemary Shahan, etc, and instructed to act like a small town genius lawyer in a John Grisham novel.

          Basically a chatbot absolutely full of ideas about how to punish corporations for shitty business practices. A resource center for consumer advocacy.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you paid for a service you were not rendered, presumably with a credit card, and attempted remediation with the company, hopefully in writing or recorded in some form, you can do a charge back with your credit card.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had purchased a year in advance last fall and when it switched over, it only didn’t play on m9bile for me for a week, then I was able to stream on mobile regularly. However, with their changes, I chose not to renew my subscription. Their quality is degrading quite a bit, it was no longer worth it.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The only way this becomes less likely in the future is if you sue them. Given you’re locked into a year contract, a lawsuit is the only kind of consequences they might face.

  • Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    what they do is lure you in with unsustainable prices and once they got established slap you with real price. Because for the real price you wouldn’t find it worthy in the first place. But now that you enjoy it it’s more likely you’ll pay more than what you might initially do

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have never seen a company actively promoting that they have less to offer. Jesus Christ will capitalism please just come to a crashing halt already

  • BoiLudens@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ja I got the email today, and I’m like, what new features? This is anti new features.

    • Candybar121@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      if you want to try your luck, I suggest contacting their customer support to notify them of this issue. I did too.

        • Candybar121@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          absolutely nothing. But they said they will inform someone of my complaint. maybe if enough people complain, they will be more likely to respond?

          I’m doing everything I can to blow this up, even if some stuff leads nowhere its worth a try. I contacted press websites as well.

          • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            They didn’t inform anyone. They laughed as they hung up. The only four words they understand are “I want to cancel”.