- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
Google’s anti-ad scripts are breaking browsers and privacy plugins. It could get worse because Google controls the ad market, Chrome, and the extension store.
Google’s anti-ad scripts are breaking browsers and privacy plugins. It could get worse because Google controls the ad market, Chrome, and the extension store.
The irony of this post being behind a paywall
This is a dumb take. Being behind a paywall means it’s not controlled by Google and its ad network.
Are these webpages and people just supposed to work for free?
404 media in particular do great work. They’re all defectors from Motherboard (vice) and I think supporting them is both worthwhile and worth it.
Is hosting YouTube infrastructure free?
I pay for YouTube and I think people need to stop complaining so much about ads if they’re not willing to support the infrastructure or the creators they likely watch hours and hours of content from.
I also think Google is charging too much and should decouple music from videos, but that’s another subject.
I also pay for YouTube. I just don’t normally bring it up because it usually results in a lot of rather unpleasant replies.
It’s fascinating, really.
Google gets a lot of hate for being a data collection behemoth. The whole “if you aren’t paying, you are the product” thing. And rightfully so.
And pirates love to say that if companies would just charge a reasonable rate for an easy-to-use service, then they would just pay instead of pirating.
But when it comes to YouTube, a lot of people seem to want to have it both ways.