• pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder if this will especially benefit poor and rural areas, especially in the Global South, that may not have great coverage.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You need more compute power at the client then, which means cheap devices will not be able to do it for a while at least. It’s neat tech for sure, but for now it mainly benefits bandwidth heavy centralized services that can save costs that way.

  • Dragosani@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    why always compare to MP3, a 30+ years old format? There a plenty alternatives and most communication platforms from zoom, jitsi, discord, … are not using MP3. Even podcast are moving away from it.

    • jorgesumle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are just making propaganda to try to convince people to invest in their terrible company.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s a good baseline, since it’s well known. I agree that a more illustrative test would be a comparison with modern codecs.