• Izzy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, $80. I haven’t looked into these devices since the first one, but I thought the point of them was to be very cheap. I do wonder what these new more powerful ones are capable of. Perhaps the performance justifies the price.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a point, and that is still very cheap. There are many other models still available that are probably a better option for small hobby projects or people learning programming or physical computing.

    • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hopefully they do release 1 and 2GB memory varoants which should be $35 and $45 respectively if they follow the pricing of previous models. The performance does look like a big upgrade over the Pi 4 at least.

  • ijeff@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The lack of full size HDMI is still pretty disappointing.

    • EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d rather have an M.2 connector without requiring a HAT.

      I’ll stick with my Orange Pi 5 for now which comes with one, tyvm.

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I gave the Orange Pi 5 a try and I love it for hosting/data intensive applications. The real M.2 for a SSD is a game changer.

        I still use RPi boards for all kinds of embedded solutions, especially once it’s GPIO based work, but for server/network kinds of work I put it on the Orange Pi 5 board.

        • EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          M.2 is a serious win. That’s why I couldn’t believe the RPi5 didn’t include one natively.

          I have a mix of Orange and Raspberry Pis. It all depends on their features, specs, and price point for the job. But if I don’t need a HAT, Orange usually wins out.

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Theres so many better options at this point that these are basically pointless unless you need a newer broadcom chip

    • zinge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could you suggest a couple SBC alternatives that I can look at? Currently using some Pi3s and Pi4s for some projects and interested in what I could switch to. I’m not using the GPIO or Pi camera, I am using USB, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, and like the size, price, low power draw, and debian support on the Pi.

      • krolden@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        CM4 is the way to go IMO. Theres tons of compatible carrier boards from super slim boards that only use one of the socket connectors to large scale cluster boards.

        Theres also alternative modules with different chips that are compatible (AFAIK) with all of the carrier boards.

  • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    NGL I still have alot of love for the ESP series for doing little automation stuffs. I miss back when the Pi’s were cheap. The Orange Pis seem nice.