• superguy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        74
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do ya’ll think you’re being clever when you say this?

        Nobody has an issue with using ‘they.’ The problem comes from those who want to force others to use ‘they’ instead of ‘he or she.’ It’s not about referring to a group of people or someone of unknown sex. It’s about a vocal minority getting really upset at statements like ‘only women can be pregnant.’

          • superguy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            60
            ·
            1 year ago

            That would be the majority, and they’re not getting upset. They’re just choosing to use the language they want to use rather than letting others force them to use it.

            • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              None of your problems in life are the result of a person you know (or even a person you don’t know) wanting to be referred to as ‘they.’

              NONE.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I believe you have “who is doing the forcing” backwards here.

              Amd now it becomes clear that “choice” isn’t what you actually care about.

              • superguy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                31
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Nah. They’re allowed to use whatever language they want.

                If you have a problem with that, then you’re the one doing the ‘forcing.’

                Something tells me you think “pregnant person” is okay but “pregnant woman” is not. I, personally, don’t really care and think they can use whatever language they want.

                Amd now it becomes clear that “choice” isn’t what you actually care about.

                Is it clear that I care about choice, now? What about you?

                  • superguy@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Because not everyone believes that men and women should be referred to by whatever pronouns they choose.

                • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “In official government documents, the following exclusionary and sexist terms shall be replaced with accurate, female-affirming alternatives"

              • superguy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                1 year ago

                And as the Republicans haven’t won the popular vote in the last 8 elections, that would show that Republicans are the minority.

                What do you mean? Did Republicans lose the popular vote in the last 8 Arkansas elections? What elections are you talking about, specifically?

                  • superguy@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What do you mean? That he purposefully tried to conflate Arkansas government with US government?

                    No, he’s just bad at arguing and expects other people to go along with it.

                    The majority of people in Arkansas support this. Saying that the majority of people in the US disagree doesn’t matter because this policy doesn’t apply to people outside of Arkansas.

                    You all know this, you’re just upset at reality.

            • SeaJ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Isn’t this a small vocal minority forcing people to use gendered language even if they don’t want to use it?

              • superguy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                25
                ·
                1 year ago

                Looks like the majority forcing a minority to use gendered language even though they don’t want to.

                  • superguy@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No, but I think it would have.

                    The majority of people in Arkansas supports policies like this.

        • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody is being forced to use “they”. You can still be a disrespectful asshole if you want.

          • superguy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Looks like this issue stems from being forced to use gender-neutral language in government documents, but I’m not an expert on the situation.

            • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The article doesn’t say anything about anyone being forced to use gender-neutral language. The only forcing I see is the executive order from the government.

              Somehow I doubt that this is really the most effective use of her time.

              • superguy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think the problem is that they were forced to use gender-neutral language in the first place.

                Somehow I doubt that this is really the most effective use of her time.

                Yeah, but that’s the case with most politicians.

                  • superguy@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    anyone was forced to use gender-neutral language.

                    I think you misunderstand. Citizens are allowed to use whatever language they want. This article is specifically referring to government documents.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you mean

          “Do men and women think men and women are being clever when men and women say men and women things?”

          No Men or women have an issue with using “they”. The problem comes from men and women who want to force others to use “they” instead of “he or she.” Men and women are not about referring to a group of Men and women or men and women of unknown sex. Men and women are talking about a vocal minority of Men and women getting really upset at statements like “only women can be pregnant.”

          I fixed all the gender neutral pronouns for you, now it makes much more sense.

          Sorry, this man means: “This man fixed all the gender neutral men and women identifiers for the interlocutor who is either a man or a woman, now the man or woman text makes much more sense”

          • superguy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            🥱

            It’s amazing the amount of effort you’re willing to go through to show us you don’t understand what’s going on.

            Gonna block you now. Tired of you people making this argument thinking it’s clever.

            Sorry reality bothers you so much.

            • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think you mean

              "Men and women are amazed at the amount of effort the man in front of this man or woman is willing to go through to show men and women that the man in front of this man or woman doesn’t understand the man or woman manning or womaning going on.

              This man or woman is going to block this man. Tired of men and women like this man making this man’s argument thinking he is clever.

              Sorry reality bothers this man so much."

      • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        First, that’s not the Bible. Second, “we” is not “gender-neutral”, it’s just the standard 1st person plural

            • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Look, I know it’s sophistry, but so is the EO in the OP. But the fact of the matter is

              • I
              • you
              • it
              • we
              • they
              • me
              • you
              • us
              • them
              • this
              • that
              • these
              • those
              • such
              • mine
              • yours
              • ours
              • theirs
              • who
              • whom
              • whomever
              • whomsoever
              • what
              • whatever
              • which
              • whichever
              • whose
              • myself
              • yourself
              • self
              • itself
              • ourselves
              • yourselves
              • themselves
              • each other
              • one another
              • all
              • another
              • anybody
              • anyone
              • anything
              • both
              • each
              • either
              • everything
              • everybody
              • everyone
              • few
              • many
              • most
              • neither
              • nobody
              • none
              • no-one
              • nothing
              • several

              are all gender-neutral. Some of them can’t logically refer to gender, true, but that doesn’t make them start being gendered either.

              EDIT: ANNNND many of them do refer to an individual (I, me, you…)