• atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    how are they similar atrocities?

    did hamas lock 2.5 million people in the worlds most dense open air prison?

    did hamas systematically crushed their buildings and not let concrete inside?

    did hamas shoot little kids just for throwing rocks?

    did hamas systematically murdered press, medics on the field?

    did hamas control israelis food intake?

    did hamas very deliberately snipe the knees of people peacefully protesting?

    did hamas cut electricity, water, food?

    did hamas bombed places that palestinian prisoners stayed?

    did hamas tell people to leave the city and bomb the only way out?

    what did hamas do? the only thing left to do when you do all of those things to a people.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s called collective punishment and there’s a reason it’s a warcrime. Being willing to punish any and every Israeli citizen for the crimes of some is just as bad and the exact same thing as what Israel is doing by cutting off power to everyone in Gaza.

      Both sides are willing to punish everyone who they consider different than them. Both Hamas and the Israeli government operate on the idea that everyone needs to be punished for the crimes of the other side.

      I don’t know what’s so hard to understand about both partaking in collective punishment. Israel has more power, money, and resources, absolutely. They’ve been horrendous to the people of Palestine, for over fifty years now.

      That will never justify killing innocents, my dude.

      An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

          • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Exactly. It’s not a choice between “murder innocent civilians” and “do nothing”; it’s a choice between “murder innocent civilians” and “target legitimate targets such as the military apparatus that actually murders Palestinians regularly or the right-wing political apparatus that pursues a policy of military hyper-aggressiom, apartheid, and settler colonialism”.

            If they chose to do the latter, I doubt nearly as many people would take issue with them, they’d receive vastly more sympathy, and they could finally end the systemic murder and oppression of Palestinians faster.

            • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Look man, if your options are literally only “do nothing and accept your fate” or “kill a bunch of innocent people who never did anything to you and actually may have supported you” then maybe you should just give up and accept your fate, because we’re literally seeing how many more innocents are dying because of this. They didn’t put a dent in Israel’s defenses. They gave Israel more excuses to the international community to murder even more innocents. Great plan, Hamas. I’m glad it worked out so swimmingly and actually changed things instead of just continuing the same bullshit cycle. /s

              If you can point to me out how this is going to result in anything other than more death and destruction, feel free to clue me in. Because fuck nothing has changed. They didn’t take out the people responsible. They didn’t change the power balance, and now even more Palestinians are paying the price because Israel is a fucked up aggressor.

              Acting like a bad plan that resulted in more innocents deaths is some great blow against the establishment is dumb as fuck.

        • redballooon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Are you saying the only options are handing out collective punishment or accepting death?

          First, that’s doubtable. But if so, I’d indeed accept death. I’m not killing innocents.

          I’d rather die than become a living monster.

          • atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            no im not saying that, youre saying that. you are equating what israel has done for 75 years to mere reaction to that. you may not believe that hamas is not killing civilians on purpose and i cannot change that, but that does not change reality.

            we have seen just war crimes over war crimes from israel just for the past few days. this is on top of decades of apartheid.

            i could accept death for myself, too. but not for my daughter.

            • redballooon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I was equating killing innocents with killing innocents, nothing else.

              You are justifying mass punishment with …something about your daughter, and with that exposing exactly the attitude that keeps the region in a never ending cycle of death.

              • atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                “2. Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for their independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;” https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-184195/

                war crimes:

                • Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
                • Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;
                • Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives;
                • The transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or outside this territory;
                • Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;
                • Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml

                these are the ones that were committed in just few days.

                • redballooon@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I understand. you list here injustice that when experienced are beyond words.

                  Now tell me: in what cases does is the punishment of innocents justified?

                  • atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    your assumption is wrong.

                    israel displaced millions of palestinians and replaced them with settlers. the blood is on israel government not hamas. they could easily not replace millions of people and we would not be here today.

        • McJonalds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          asymmetric warfare. i would figure it out. sorry about your palestinians but im different. /s