This might sound like a question inspired by current events, but I’ve actually been thinking of this for a while and can give pointers to a few times I had asked this or talked about it.

The people who the masses look up to seem to have a strange way of dishing out their opinions/approval/disapproval of the groups of the world. Some groups can get away with being considered good no matter how negative their actions are while other groups are stuck with a high disapproval rating no matter how much good they might do, and a discussion on whether “culture” or a “cult” is involved almost always comes up.

An example of this is the relationship between Islam and Scientology, in fact this is the most infamous one I can link to having spoken about. People on a certain side of the thinktank spectrum (the same side Lemmy seems to lean towards at times) are quick to criticize Scientology even though they consider “classic Islamic philosophy”, for a lack of a better way to put it without generalizing, as not inspiring a call for critique to see how one may change it. And I’ve always wondered, why? One at times leads people to trying to exterminate innocent groups, the other one is just “Space Gnosticism” that has a few toxic aspects but hasn’t actually eliminated anyone. Of course, I’m not defending either one, but certainly I’d rather live in a stressful environment than one that actively targets me.

This question has been asked a few times, sometimes without me but sometimes when I’m around to be involved, and they always say (and it’s in my dumb voice that I quote them) “well Scientology is a cult, of course we can criticize them” and then a bit about how whatever other thing is being talked about is a part of culture. This doesn’t sit well with my way of thinking. I was taught to judge people by the content of their character, in other words their virtues, so in my mind, a good X is better than a bad Y, in this case a good cult should be better than a good culture, right? Right?

In fact, as what many might call a mild misanthrope, I’d flip it around and point out how, over the course of human history, alongside seemingly objectively questionable quirks people just brush off (like Japan for a while has been genociding dolphins for their meat value just above extinction “because it’s culture” or how there are people in China who still think dinosaur bones are a form of medicine waiting to be ground up), no group/culture has kept their innocence intact, every country having had genocides or unnecessary wars or something of the like, things they ALLOW to happen by design. Then they turn around and tell so-called “cults”, even the ones that have their priorities on straight compared to cultures, that they are pariahs and shouldn’t count on thriving, even though their status is one that doesn’t necessitate gaining any kind of guilt. I was a pariah growing up, almost everyone else revolved around a select few people that seemed in-tune to the culture, and they would say anyone who revolved around people outside the group (me for example) was “following a cult”, and this hurt at the time, but now seeing all the wars going on right now, I might consider this a compliment.

My question, even though it by definition might make affirming answerers question whether they are pariahs or a part of the cultural arena, is why does nobody agree? Why are cultures “always precious” while cults are “always suspicious”?

  • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I invite you to answer the questions I asked and consider much greater violences at hand. I didn’t make you cite Sam Harris or conflate Islamic countries or buy into right wing xenophobic fear narratives, but I did respond to them.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then it’s a good thing I didn’t do any of that, now isn’t it?

      For every question you say hasn’t been answered, I can point to (or quote) a part of what I said that does exactly that.

      • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You did all of the things I listed and ignored most of my questions. If you honestly believe otherwise, I invite you to revisit what was said and asked and ask yourself whether you acknowledged it at all, let alone actually addressed what was said.

        Though I’m not stupid, I know what defensive behavior and fibbing looks like by someone that is uncomfortable. I’m not going to be polite if you try this again.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Suppose for a moment I sincerely believe I addressed everything (and I do). Saying out of disagreement “review it yourself” would thus be a request I cannot humor, that’s why I invited you to give examples. I also don’t know who this Sam Harris guy is, so I’m not sure why you say I cited him, but I even did a CTRL+F trick to make sure. I still don’t see it.

          • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Suppose for a moment I sincerely believe I addressed everything (and I do). Saying out of disagreement “review it yourself” would thus be a request I cannot humor,

            Oh, so you are incapable of listening to others and doubting yourself when they disagree with you? Yes, I agree, that’s the real issue here.

            Anyways maybe you’ll drop this dishonest pretense if I point out that my first paragraph was nearly all questions you did not answer:

            “What is the relevance of what you think would happen to you in an Islamic country? I’d also point out that Islam is not a monolith and Muslims are not a monolith, despite your implications, so which Islamic countries are you thinking of? Are you sure you didn’t have a particular idea in mind when you conflated “islamic country” with the scenario you are thinking of? What do the people there look like? What do they believe? What would they do to you?”

            At most you said it was not your intention to generalize, but (1) that still doesn’t answer my questions and (2) yes you absolutely did that repeatedly, it’s literally the premise of your post and these replies. You are, of course, aware of this, you’re just handling contradiction poorly.

            If you’d like a tip: you always have the option of just not responding. It’s a lot better than what you’ve been doing.

            that’s why I invited you to give examples.

            You didn’t ask for examples lol

            I also don’t know who this Sam Harris guy is, so I’m not sure why you say I cited him, but I even did a CTRL+F trick to make sure. I still don’t see it.

            You cited his subreddit and your poorly-veiled, cagey focus is drawn from the islamophobia he pushes out. Maybe you’re so confused that you don’t even know where you picked up this garbage, but as I explained in my original response, that’s where these grifters come from.

            Be better.

            • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, so you are incapable of listening to others and doubting yourself when they disagree with you? Yes, I agree, that’s the real issue here.

              The comment you’re replying to with that statement implies I thought I addressed everything, and when you objected to that, I asked if you could point to where you believe I hadn’t. That’s not the same as not listening. If it’s dishonest to ask someone to give examples, I would doubt you think anyone on this thread is honest.

              I do maintain I answered the questions, but I will paraphrase my answers, piece by piece.

              What is the relevance of what you think would happen to you in an Islamic country?

              The relevance is in the character. People see “true” cults with negative connotations. But if we were comparing said “cults” with groups that are part and parcel with the global community, they have a better human rights track record than some of the latter. The first group that would come to mind in this context is Islam. People in those countries (and you can say I’m generalizing, but whether “all” such countries do it isn’t the point, it’s that cults have a better track record) still execute/imprison people based on gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, and sometimes politics and medical conditions. People will argue cults are accepting of people for the wrong reasons, but it’s still better than mistreatment.

              I’d also point out that Islam is not a monolith and Muslims are not a monolith, despite your implications, so which Islamic countries are you thinking of?

              I didn’t list them all, but I did give an area, and I did imply Palestine as it falls under the umbrella of current events. I don’t have an exact visual map of all Islamic countries, but my point didn’t require it, it does not need to specify which countries whether or not it claims all the countries over there are susceptible to it (and it doesn’t), because it pertains to the cultures and the groups harbored by them. The point, again, is that cults have a better track record than those groups.

              Are you sure you didn’t have a particular idea in mind when you conflated “islamic country” with the scenario you are thinking of?

              See my paragraph above.

              What do the people there look like?

              Nothing in particular. That was never a factor in what I was implying. I don’t have a set idea on that.

              What do they believe?

              The Quran, which has my death warrant inscribed within it. If they’re not out to kill/imprison me, thank God, but it also means the Quran’s definition of what it considers Islam has been reduced.

              What would they do to you?

              See my paragraph above.

              and (2) yes you absolutely did that repeatedly

              See my paragraph four lines ago. Generalization would require someone say all of a group is like the most stereotypical people in said group. I made no such remark, and any claim that says I implied it is reading what’s not in the words. I did refer to “them” though implying the fact there is a “conventional” way they go about themselves. The statement “all sheep are white” =/= the statement “sheep are typically white”.

              You didn’t ask for examples lol

              So saying “for every question you say hasn’t been answered, I can point to (or quote) a part of what I said that does exactly that” isn’t a cue for you to do, well, exactly that?

              You cited his subreddit and your poorly-veiled, cagey focus is drawn from the islamophobia he pushes out. Maybe you’re so confused that you don’t even know where you picked up this garbage, but as I explained in my original response, that’s where these grifters come from.

              Citing a post in a subreddit referred to as r/samharris isn’t the same as citing the actual Sam Harris, so that confusion was on you. Such pseudo-groups occur all the time on Reddit. Neither does it imply everything in it is going to be created in malice. So that’s a strawman, as have been much of the responses I’ve gotten.

              • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                The comment you’re replying to with that statement implies I thought I addressed everything, and when you objected to that, I asked if you could point to where you believe I hadn’t.

                I just did that again it’s the whole first paragraph that was basically just questions. And you never asked, you just made assertions.

                PS I shouldn’t need to do that because you are perfectly capable of going back, finding questions, and rethinking whether you addressed them.

                If it’s dishonest to ask someone to give examples, I would doubt you think anyone on this thread is honest.

                Is that what I’m saying is dishonest?

                What is the relevance of what you think would happen to you in an Islamic country?

                The relevance is in the character. People see “true” cults with negative connotations. (…)

                Right you’re not getting the question. It’s intended to make you question at a deeper level why you’re asking the question in the first place, a question that builds on islamophobia tropes that are common in the sources you’ve cited. Everyone already knows you’re thinking about comparing cults and Islam. Everyone already knows you perceive danger from Islam. I’m trying to prompt you to question why you chose this example in particular given that it is a trope among racists.

                I’d also point out that Islam is not a monolith and Muslims are not a monolith, despite your implications, so which Islamic countries are you thinking of?

                I didn’t list them all, but I did give an area, and I did imply Palestine as it falls under the umbrella of current events.

                You waved vaguely towards the Middle East albeit without actually directly answering my question. So no, you didn’t answer that question, which was clearly asking you to concretize your veiled statements.

                But okay, what comes to mind for you is Palestine. Nobody is surprised that you chose this moment to share denigrating opinions towards the people of Palestine. Again, I’m not stupid, but you are being cagey.

                Do you see how my descriptions of racist islamophobia and its purveyors are relevant? An entire population is facing occupation and genocide and your first thoughts are about how to be afraid of and denigrate them, supposedly due to their culture and religion, and conflating them with the entirety of Islam (hmmm lumping very different cultures and ethnicities together to dismiss them over fears, I wonder what that is).

                I don’t have an exact visual map of all Islamic countries, but my point didn’t require it, it does not need to specify which countries whether or not it claims all the countries over there are susceptible to it (and it doesn’t), because it pertains to the cultures and the groups harbored by them. The point, again, is that cults have a better track record than those groups.

                Doubling down to say “I don’t need to distinguish Islamic countries” is an interesting choice.

                See my paragraph above.

                Your paragraph above doesn’t really answer the yes or no question. Seems like it might be no? Who knows, you are afraid to speak plainly.

                Nothing in particular. That was never a factor in what I was implying. I don’t have a set idea on that.

                You have no mental image of the people you fear would oppress you if you lived there? You don’t know what people vaguely in the middle east (apparently what you’re referring to) look like?

                Anyways this question was intended to make you confront the cultural and ethnic diversity you were glossing over by lumping all of Islam together and you didn’t answer it in any way earlier.

                The Quran, which has my death warrant inscribed within it. If they’re not out to kill/imprison me, thank God, but it also means the Quran’s definition of what it considers Islam has been reduced.

                Another question that was intended for you to think a little more deeply (and you didn’t answer before).

                Your entire understanding of Islam in the middle east is just that they all believe the Quran? The generous interpretation is that you know there’s diversity and this is the commonality, but I think we both know that’s not what you’re thinking, especially given your comment about what’s in it.

                Have you actually read the Quran? The Hadith? The history of tolerance in Palestine and surrounding countries? The origins of fundamentalism that I mentioned in my earlier responses? (These are rhetorical, you obviously don’t and are not curious).

                See my paragraph above.

                So, islamophobia?

                See my paragraph four lines ago. Generalization would require someone say all of a group is like the most stereotypical people in said group.

                Wrong. You just have to generalize by, say, ignorantly lumping all Islamic countries together to make a false claim. Though you certainly are leaning on right wing stereotypes of Muslims.

                So saying “for every question you say hasn’t been answered, I can point to (or quote) a part of what I said that does exactly that” isn’t a cue for you to do, well, exactly that?

                Yeah you don’t seem to understand what asking means. Are you confused about that all the time or only when contradicted?

                Citing a post in a subreddit referred to as r/samharris isn’t the same as citing the actual Sam Harris, so that confusion was on you.

                I was hoping you’d try to make that meaningless distinction. You think I don’t know why you use that source? lol

                Such pseudo-groups occur all the time on Reddit. Neither does it imply everything in it is going to be created in malice. So that’s a strawman, as have been much of the responses I’ve gotten.

                Yessss I was hoping for an erroneous reference to a logical fallacy. Surprised it didn’t come up earlier. I know your type very well, lol.

                Don’t worry I’ll give you a free lesson anyways. A straw man argument is where you intentionally set up a position you claim your opponent holds (even though they don’t) just because it’s easier to knock down than their actual position. On the contrary, I’ve been trying to get your cagey butt to acknowledge what you’ve been hinting at and criticizing the positions I know are behind them. This is because you aren’t fooling anyone with your veiled and general references, there are real humans here that know what islamophobic, chsuvinist “skeptic” grifters say and do and have actually had to spend time defending their communities from the braying racism you’re trying to both show and hide.

                • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I just did that again it’s the whole first paragraph that was basically just questions. And you never asked, you just made assertions. PS I shouldn’t need to do that because you are perfectly capable of going back, finding questions, and rethinking whether you addressed them.

                  Unless, of course, I believed I already addressed them, and my answers I did provide in my previous reply were paraphrasings of things I already said.

                  Right you’re not getting the question.

                  Kinda proves my point, doesn’t it? You leave the interpreting to me and wonder why you get misinterpreted after I ask you to elaborate.

                  Everyone already knows you’re thinking about comparing cults and Islam.

                  You say that like there is no instant access to the many other replies I’ve gotten on this thread. You’re the only one here with the objection you imply you have. The only one. “Everyone already knows you perceive danger from Islam” is false, again the other replies are readable, not only do I not assume all Muslims are the same but everyone else does agree something is afoot today with the culture. The keyword being culture.

                  So no, you didn’t answer that question, which was clearly asking you to concretize your veiled statements.

                  Again, proving my point I moments ago mentioned you proved.

                  But okay, what comes to mind for you is Palestine. Nobody is surprised that you chose this moment to share denigrating opinions towards the people of Palestine. Again, I’m not stupid, but you are being cagey.

                  I’m guessing this is personal for you. Yeah, I chose this moment, because this kind of thing is currently more vivid on peoples’ minds.

                  Do you see how my descriptions of racist islamophobia and its purveyors are relevant? An entire population is facing occupation and genocide and your first thoughts are about how to be afraid of and denigrate them, supposedly due to their culture and religion, and conflating them with the entirety of Islam (hmmm lumping very different cultures and ethnicities together to dismiss them over fears, I wonder what that is).

                  To think I merely gave Islamic culture as an example of a broader topic and I incur your anger. Israel and Palestine are both somewhat guilty, the difference is one is the only state of its kind and not only does the other one follow a philosophical system followed by a whole area of the world but is also currently backed by Russia and North Korea, one of which is a nation with a machiavellian agenda while the other is a historically infamous human rights mess itself.

                  Doubling down to say “I don’t need to distinguish Islamic countries” is an interesting choice.

                  in-groups =/= cultures =/= countries

                  Your paragraph above doesn’t really answer the yes or no question. Seems like it might be no? Who knows, you are afraid to speak plainly.

                  You’re proving that one point again.

                  You have no mental image of the people you fear would oppress you if you lived there? You don’t know what people vaguely in the middle east (apparently what you’re referring to) look like?

                  Must I? I’m trying not to generalize. Especially ethnicity. Are you asking me to?

                  Anyways this question was intended to make you confront the cultural and ethnic diversity you were glossing over by lumping all of Islam together and you didn’t answer it in any way earlier.

                  So in other words you set up a trap and I avoided it? I’m not understanding. This isn’t about race. I’m not against any race. To say I am is… kinda generalizing. Culture is not race. Hawaii is an Asian-majority state, does that make it less Hawaiian culture than it was generations before? Aspects of peoples’ biology is just not on my mind in any part of this.

                  Another question that was intended for you to think a little more deeply (and you didn’t answer before). Your entire understanding of Islam in the middle east is just that they all believe the Quran? The generous interpretation is that you know there’s diversity and this is the commonality, but I think we both know that’s not what you’re thinking, especially given your comment about what’s in it.

                  The whole point of not generalizing is to apply as few assumptions as possible, so yeah, all of Islamic culture has the Quran in common and nothing more. Again, are you asking me to generalize now?

                  Have you actually read the Quran? The Hadith? The history of tolerance in Palestine and surrounding countries? The origins of fundamentalism that I mentioned in my earlier responses? (These are rhetorical, you obviously don’t and are not curious).

                  Yes, I have read hundreds of works on this, enough that I can engage in conversations such as my tweet here and all the replies it’s replying to, so no need to attack me with the remark that I must not for personal sake.

                  Inevitably, I have looked at the Quran to look for answers as well. Muhammad’s darker moments are context-specific, but that doesn’t mean they’re not there and used to justify said human rights relapses.

                  The hadith is worse in this regard, though I wasn’t even thinking of it, as many places in the Ummah, fortunately, don’t even consider it unquestionable. It has the same problem as Paul’s books in the Bible canon, in that it was written by authorities who wanted to put insertions in a growing movement.

                  Tolerance has varied in Palestine and surrounding countries throughout history, but in every point in history, they’ve always had at least a few people who they downplay, yet even the fact that any point in a group’s history has systemic homicide makes it worst than your regular cult, none of which have any distinction of weeding out minorities on such a scale, again (for a fourth time) the point of my question being the worthiness of cultures versus cults.

                  Also, not sure if you’re trying to imply they’re not in the Ummah, but I should point out Southeast Asia is in the same sphere of influence. They, though, have been far, far better about how to treat minorities and only someone who is generalizing wouldn’t give them an honorable mention.

                  So, islamophobia?

                  Read the above.

                  Wrong. You just have to generalize by, say, ignorantly lumping all Islamic countries together to make a false claim.

                  Then it’s a good thing I didn’t do that, now isn’t it?

                  Though you certainly are leaning on right wing stereotypes of Muslims.

                  Put me on record as pointing out you’re the very first person to bring politics into this. In the words of almost every Democratic candidate in the past two decades, human rights are not a political issue.

                  Yeah you don’t seem to understand what asking means. Are you confused about that all the time or only when contradicted?

                  I asked you in the reply of mine after the one where I cued you. You did acknowledge what my intentions were at the time too, namely when you told me to review it myself, so contradiction seems to be a theme here.

                  I was hoping you’d try to make that meaningless distinction. You think I don’t know why you use that source? lol

                  Case in point. You call it a meaningless distinction, but in practice it’s generalization. I had seen the post before and googled it to get it again, that’s why the post you saw is the one you got.

                  If done intentionally, putting words in someone’s mouth regarding their views is what someone does when they have nothing they can say in response to their actual words.

                  Yessss I was hoping for an erroneous reference to a logical fallacy. Surprised it didn’t come up earlier. I know your type very well, lol.

                  Your replies where you assume my whole political ideology, culture, race, religion, and intentions would certainly suggest you think you do, but I have more proof to the contrary. Both in the form of my ability to speak for myself and links to me talking about my past viewed. Which makes it exactly how you describe strawmen in your definition.

                  On the contrary, I’ve been trying to get your cagey butt to acknowledge what you’ve been hinting at and criticizing the positions I know are behind them. This is because you aren’t fooling anyone with your veiled and general references, there are real humans here that know what islamophobic, chsuvinist “skeptic” grifters say and do and have actually had to spend time defending their communities from the braying racism you’re trying to both show and hide.

                  You think you know who I am? Prove it, with evidence (not just your word about my word versus my word about my word). I’ve been debating for a decade and a half, surely you can find evidence. Or you can acknowledge that, as I say again, that the OP is simply about cultures versus cults (in general).

                  • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Unless, of course, I believed I already addressed them, and my answers I did provide in my previous reply were paraphrasings of things I already said.

                    We’ve now entered the pathological lying portion of coping with contradiction. You didn’t answer several of those questions in any form and made confused passes at a couple out of order.

                    Kinda proves my point, doesn’t it? You leave the interpreting to me and wonder why you get misinterpreted after I ask you to elaborate.

                    Uh yeah you do have to interpret questions in order to answer them that’s how the game of question-answer works.

                    You say that like there is no instant access to the many other replies I’ve gotten on this thread. You’re the only one here with the objection you imply you have. The only one.

                    Wrong. Check out those upvote ratios, lib.

                    “Everyone already knows you perceive danger from Islam” is false, again the other replies are readable, […]

                    There is no contradiction even though you’re acting like there is one.

                    Again, proving my point I moments ago mentioned you proved.

                    Your point where you feign incompetence to avoid answering a question?

                    I’m guessing this is personal for you. Yeah, I chose this moment, because this kind of thing is currently more vivid on peoples’ minds.

                    Whoosh

                    To think I merely gave Islamic culture as an example (…)

                    You have still failed to internalize that there is no such thing as singular Islamic culture. You’re doing the racist thing right here and now. You can’t help yourself.

                    Israel and Palestine are both somewhat guilty (…)

                    Oh, I don’t care about your ignorant opinions on Israel and Palestine.

                    in-groups =/= cultures =/= countries

                    ?

                    Must I? I’m trying not to generalize. Especially ethnicity. Are you asking me to?

                    I was calling attention to the fact that Islam is multi-ethnic and global in contrast to your lazy and racist statements.

                    So in other words you set up a trap and I avoided it? I’m not understanding.

                    I suppose you would think that challenging your false assumptions is some kind of trap, lol.

                    This isn’t about race. I’m not against any race. To say I am is… kinda generalizing. Culture is not race. Hawaii is an Asian-majority state, does that make it less Hawaiian culture than it was generations before? Aspects of peoples’ biology is just not on my mind in any part of this.

                    And yet you conflated islamic culture and being vaguely middle eastern. Of course you’re being racist. Only someone who has no idea how race is socially constructed could disagree.

                    Race has never been about biology btw.

                    The whole point of not generalizing […]

                    I am describing what you’ve done, you just don’t like the characterization.

                    Yes, I have read hundreds of works on this, enough that I can engage in conversations such as my tweet here and all the replies it’s replying to, so no need to attack me with the remark that I must not for personal sake.

                    “I have read hundreds of works on this” is weirdly not an answer to my question and makes me wonder what the “yes” means. If you are claiming to have read the Quran and the Hadith, as in all of it, I don’t believe you. You have demonstrated nothing but ignorance of Islam and incuriosity.

                    Who knows what that tweet is supposed to demonstrate.

                    [A strange set of seemingly random statements about the Quran and Hadith]

                    Cool this jives with my position that you’ve exclusively read other people’s opinions.

                    Tolerance has varied in Palestine and surrounding countries throughout history, but in every point in history, they’ve always had at least a few people who they downplay,

                    Who is “they”? What does it mean that they downplayed a few people? None of this makes sense.

                    yet even the fact that any point in a group’s history has systemic homicide […]

                    None of this makes any sense. It is not coherent thoughts.

                    Also, not sure if you’re trying to imply they’re not in the Ummah, but I should point out Southeast Asia is in the same sphere of influence.

                    A sphere of influence has an influencer, which is required to understand the claim, but you don’t list one.

                    They, though, have been far, far better about how to treat minorities and only someone who is generalizing wouldn’t give them an honorable mention.

                    Except you did generalize and in fact keep doing it over and over again. You can’t rhetoric your past and current statements out of existence.

                    Then it’s a good thing I didn’t do that, now isn’t it?

                    Except you did.

                    Put me on record as pointing out you’re the very first person to bring politics into this. In the words of almost every Democratic candidate in the past two decades, human rights are not a political issue.

                    1. This post and thread is inherently political. Impressive that you don’t understand that.

                    2. Why should I respect the opinion of Democratic candidates?

                    3. Human rights are 100% political. In fact, the term itself is used in an exclusively political way. Have you ever noticed how only non-Western-aligned countries are the only ones described as violating human rights?

                    I asked you in the reply of mine after the one where I cued you.

                    I will help you understand what asking is. If it doesn’t have a question mark, you didn’t ask for it.

                    Case in point. You call it a meaningless distinction, but in practice it’s generalization. I had seen the post before and googled it to get it again, that’s why the post you saw is the one you got.

                    Generalization is not inherently bad and is in fact necessary for someone to learn anything. Learning things like what kind of person thinks Sam Harris isn’t an embarrassment and uses his subreddit as a source.

                    A generalization is bad when it’s reactionary and dehumanizing, like being racist.

                    If done intentionally, putting words in someone’s mouth regarding their views is what someone does when they have nothing they can say in response to their actual words.

                    Did I make up the fact that you cited the Sam Harris subreddit? You know, the subreddit dedicated to the infamous islamophobe? The “skeptic” who uses the same language you do? Folks that jump at the chance to identify a perceived logical fallacy?

                    Your replies where you assume my whole political ideology

                    I haven’t mentioned your political ideology. I would wager that it is incoherent and immature. But you are embedded in a reactionary and islamophobic subculture somewhere, one in the orbit of self-proclaimed skeptics or rationalists.

                    culture

                    Not difficult to guess given what people worry about a vague conglomeration of Muslims coming to their country and making things dangerous.

                    [my] race, religion

                    Nope haven’t said anything about those

                    intentions

                    Easy to interpret from your caginess and use of multiple racist and xenophobic tropes.

                    would certainly suggest you think you do, but I have more proof to the contrary. Both in the form of my ability to speak for myself and links to me talking about my past viewed.

                    These are not in contradiction with what I said.

                    Which makes it exactly how you describe strawmen in your definition.

                    Except it’s not because the things I’m criticizing are the things you’re actually writing down right here on the internet.

                    You think you know who I am? Prove it, with evidence (not just your word about my word versus my word about my word). I’ve been debating for a decade and a half, surely you can find evidence.

                    No thanks. Don’t care and I already have enough info for my personal satisfaction.

                    I’m just letting you know that this is all unoriginal and I’m already very familiar with it, right down to the obsessive sophistry to avoid admitting any kind of error whatsoever.

                    Or you can acknowledge that, as I say again, that the OP is simply about cultures versus cults (in general).

                    Nah I’ll stick with the truth.