Baldur’s Gate 3 is currently taking up all the storage space I would give to Bethesda’s sci-fi RPG.

  • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think you understand economies of scale. It doesn’t make sense for me to pay retail price for a single unit, especially if I have no other use for it. These costs are trivial at scale, and would also hopefully provide some impetus to optimise the code and texture storage.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Economies of scale aren’t magic. Games are somewhat resistant to price increases in the face of inflation because we’ve shifted to digital distribution that you’re looking to erode with the suggestion of shipping with physical media again, and you’d still have to pay well more than half of the price it would take you to buy that same media on Amazon. The storage size has grown because they’ve been optimizing for other factors, and I’m sure they came to the conclusion that it’s more likely you’ll free up space or buy storage expansions in the future after a price drop than it is that you would buy a game that ran worse or looked worse forever because they optimized more for storage space.

      • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am happy to pay whatever extra it costs to have the experience of actually owning a game on a lasting medium with some artwork. My experience with digital downloads is that I just never care as much. Often I won’t even finish the game unless it is beyond amazing. I like to receive tangible things for my hard earned money I guess.