Tesla is facing issues with the bare metal construction of the Cybertruck, which Elon Musk warned was as tricky to do as making Lego bricks

  • Dettweiler@lemmyonline.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s almost like he hears about how bad the build quality of Tesla cars have become, so he thinks the solution is more accurrate, more expensive parts. Kind of like he has absolutely no clue what he’s doing, and doesn’t want to listen to smarter people telling him what they need.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s more likely that he is looking for excuses for the years of delays on the cyber truck.

      Now he can blame it on his “desire for perfection” instead of admitting that his timeline was never viable

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The design isn’t viable. They could have developed a new car in less time if it wasn’t going to be an absolute nightmare to produce reliably.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s not forget about the new Roadster that was due to enter production 3 years ago.
          Everyone that bought one gave Tesla a $250k interest-free loan.

          This is all starting to seem intentional.

          • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At some point, once consumer rights are eroded enough , the straightest path to profits is just downright theft. Take money now, worry about product later. It’s literally inevitable and the video game industry is really fuckin good at it.

  • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    10 microns is .4 thou, about the width of a cotton fiber. Its possible to machine those tolerances, but very time consuming as machine maintainance steps up. Its also small enough that the thermal expansion of the sheets will be larger than that

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So basically elon would rather dump money into expensive equipment to improve build quality than do the thing that’s actually needed to improve build quality and pay his workers what their work is worth and make their factory environment safer?

      This is the kind of petty angry bullshit you have to do to be a billionaire. Its not about being smart, it’s about on some level hating everyone that isn’t you

      • blargerer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        You aren’t going to hit that tolerance consistently on an assembly line no matter how much you pay. Can be done by a skilled machinist, but there are too many dynamical variables in an assembly line environment, like the previously mentioned thermal expansion.

        • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess they could do like Nissan did with the GTR’s engine: climate controlled assembly bay, temperature check on the parts etc…

          But I mean, they did it only for the engine which is relatively small

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not even about that. You absolutely don’t need those tolerances for a cup holder. An assembly line will fuck it up regardless. You use tolerances like that when needed - in jet engines or turbines. Insisting on those numbers on a car is plain stupid - it isn’t better (other than the ego boosting “my car has high tolerances where nobody cares”) than just doing it like every other manufacturer does it. It’s a waste of money plain and simple.

        • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          For reference, in working with parts that interface directly with optical components about the tightest I’m ever comfortable specifying at production volumes is 0.05mm and that is for very specific dimensions and not entire parts yet he is demanding 5 times lower tolerances here.

      • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I meant is that Elon has set a fairly un-achievable standard, as the sheet metal parts he is talking about will grow and shrink by more than that depending on weather. Additionaly, the small parts can be machined to that tolerance, but only by a skilled machinist and not at assembly line levels.

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Besides just thermal expansion, which will totally happen by driving on the road, the rotation of the motors and the use of brakes.

          It will also flex as it hits bumps and takes turns.

          And these will be different metals. With different thicknesses which will expand and contract at different rates.

  • dmention7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If LEGO and soda cans, which are very low cost, can do this, so can we.

    This man is a certifiable idiot, and I feel bad for anyone working for him.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, to be fair, he’s not entirely wrong, you can get that accuracy on larger parts given sufficient time, materials, tools, expertise, etc.

      But a car has more parts than a Lego brick

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah anything is possible with enough time and money, it’s just that is about the most textbook example of comparing apples to oranges I’ve seen IRL.

        Also, I suppose Lego bricks might be considered low cost if you’re a billionaire, but in the grand scheme of molded plastics they are very much a premium product.

      • frickineh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe he can build the truck out of LEGOs - it would cost about a bajillion dollars to make something that size, but maybe less than the parts he’s demanding would be.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “All parts for this vehicle, whether internal or from suppliers, need to be designed and built to sub 10 micron accuracy.​”

    LOL

    Yeah ok.

    Tell me you know nothing about manufacturing, without telling me you know nothing about manufacturing.

    That one quote - assuming it is accurate - explains that Musk is even more of an idiot than everyone already knew he was. You don’t make things at those tight tolerances. A couple of dimensions on a part might be (for instance the bore on a press fit sleeve), but you’d almost never, ever hold an entire part to that tight of a tolerance.

    In imperial units, 10 microns is .00039". A human hair is roughly .001 to .005" thick. So he is asking for a tolerance that is 3 to 10x smaller than the thickness of a human hair. To put the absurdity of Musk’s demand into perspective, most parts that go into a car are roughly an order of magnitude looser in tolerance with some dimensions being 2 orders of magnitude looser.

    That difference might not sound like a lot, but holding something to +/-.0039 versus +/-.00039" could easily triple the price of an item or more. Easy. You use a tight tolerance only when you need to - that’s engineering 101. Some parts could easily be +/- .039" and not affect their performance on bit. Close tolerance engine parts might be held at what Musk is demanding, but never “ALL PARTS” would be held to that.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As someone who knows almost nothing about the topic, wouldn’t some (most?) of these parts be big enough that a small change in temperature or air pressure alone would cause these parts to expand/shrink enough to go over the tolerance limit?

      • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, and different materials will have different rates of thermal expansion. That’s probably why the pixel 7 camera glass was cracking for no apparent reason when winter hit. Imagine coming out in the morning and finding all the glass in your car shattered because it got cold overnight. Or even worse you take it out of a heated garage on a cold day and the glass shatters while you’re driving.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thermal expansion of steel is .0000072" per degree F. All you would need is a 100 degree F temp change to blow that tolerance out of the water. And 100 degrees is not that much when it comes to cars. A freezing cold day versus a boiling hot day in the summer is a temperature swing more than 100 degrees. A ICE engine runs at roughly 250 degrees F so that right there would easily expand parts way more than the tolerance he is calling for. On an EV, I don’t think anything gets that hot, but the motors still get warm.

      • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We compensate for thermal expansion. The standard temperature things are measured at is 68F/20C. So if it’s 72 degrees we’ll compensate it back to 68 in software for the material we’re measuring. We use scale bars of known length and similar material type to verify scale. (I run laser trackers and laser radars.)

        For measurement equipment that’s stationary, like CMMs, you just control the environment.

    • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work in semiconductor industry where machines need to have sub-micron positioning accuracy and even we don’t generally design parts with 10 micron tolerances, unless it really needs to.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No customer would NEED that accuracy on all parts. Just shows what kind of clown Elon is.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I was young I got a job at a manufacturing place that made all sorts of parts for sensitive equipment. Younger people, or people with steady hands would debur and smooth. We would have these huge magnifiers and friggin microscopes and be working with what looked like a really long tiny exacto knives that needed to be replaced every 5 minutes or a couple dozen uses to get that stuff to spec. You can spend 20 minutes on a piece, think it’s perfect and then QC would send it right back because they somehow found some tiny inconsistency or groove you didn’t or couldn’t notice.

      There is no way you can expect that level of accuracy, unless your willing to pay for clean room level stuff. Even we weren’t always quite that accurate depending on the end use and they charged like almost $50 for something that looked quite like something you get a hardware store for 50 cents.

    • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve told many (usually new) design engineers that they’re stupid for asking for 0.001" tolerance on parts when they only need 0.005 “or 0.010”. The difference between 0.010" and sub-10 micron is easily a factor of 100 in most parts, ESPECIALLY when you’re talking larger steel components like panels on a freaking car.

      • eee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        ESPECIALLY when you’re talking larger steel components like panels on a freaking car.

        not just that, he said “all parts”. The stitching on the seats, the floor carpets, USB ports, cupholders and the A/C vents have to be more accurate than the width of a human hair too

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless you are talking about a press fit location or some kind of high precision alignment issue, almost nothing needs anything tighter than .001" and .005 or .010" is perfectly fine for most things. I work with a lot of weldments so if we’re within .030" we consider that good enough.

    • BeansLeg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just coming in to say you are completely and absolutely correct. 🍻

    • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see anywhere in the article where Musk says “tolerance”. He specifically says “accuracy” and goes on the talk about listing more decimal places instead of rounding. Any mention of tolerance is done by the author of the article. If certain dimensions are not naturally rounded to one, or even two decimals, there is no reason not to list it to three or more on modern drawings. GD&T can specify whatever tolerance is necessary without relying on a decimal-based block tolerance. I’d be interested in seeing the original email but it seems like there is a misunderstanding by the author given the context being discussed.

      I default to three decimal places for all my basic dimensions on both in and mm drawings. One of the benefits of GD&T is that you can give provide additional dimensional accuracy, completely independent of the tolerance being specified.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a really good point. If this is actually for the intervening calculations, that’d make a lot more sense.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The linguistics of metrology is not exactly a topic I’m particularly passionate about, but if yiu look at the technical definition of accuracy, it essentially is the same as a tolerance.

        Accuracy: the degree to which the result of a measurement, calculation, or specification conforms to the correct value or a standard.

        And when it comes to decimal places, you’d never display more than you really need. If a dimension is +/- .010" there is absolutely no reason to display it to 4 decimal places. That doesn’t win you anything. More importantly, I’m sure a company like Tesla doesn’t even use drawings at all. I’m sure they are paperless and send out their models for machining.

        • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there is a very important distinction between accuracy and tolerance in engineering. +/- .010" is not a dimension, but a tolerance that can be applied to a dimension. However if your example was changed to a .010" dimension, I would agree with you as I stated in my last comment. There is no need to give any further accuracy to that dimension if you are just adding zeros to the end (unless you are using block tolerances that rely on a specific number of digits to correspond with a standard tolerance). Unfortunately, not everything is designed using the same units and you will inevitably end up with a part designed in mm that uses a bolt-on component using a hole span in inches (for example, a nice round 1-in span). If you want a +/-1 mm tolerance on that part, you wouldn’t want to round every dimension to the nearest mm because you may end up with a tolerance of 24-26 mm when you really wanted 24.4 to 26.4 mm. I like to provide true dimensional accuracy (to microns or .0001" if I’m not just adding zeros) and then apply a suitable tolerance independently, using GD&T.

          Regarding paperless manufacturing, I agree that many components are made straight from the models these days and imported directly into a CNC machine. However, there should always be a drawing or a digital equivalent a drawing. This is the contract that specifies acceptable tolerances to the manufacturer, and it will be used during QA inspection to determine if an acceptable part has been delivered.

          • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think there is an important distinction between accuracy and precision in engineering. I’m having flashbacks of sitting in class when the professor was going over this stuff. I honestly always found it some of the most boring topics in the curriculum.

            • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              One of my physics profs had a story about this. He needed two resistors to be very similar in performance for a circuit he was making, so he asked for a couple of the super-high-quality ones.

              His advisor said “fuck that, get the 1% bin, they’ll be bimodal at 1% above and below rating, sort em and find two that match to the degree you need”

              That’s kind of analogous; do you need to try to hit a particular value (accuracy) or do you need things in a consistent relation to one another (precision)?

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Engine parts? Tesla’s don’t have engines, they have electric motors which shouldn’t need this level of precision. Electric motors they have today work pretty well already.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He’s probably hyper self conscious about people ripping into Teslas over their clearances (with inconsistencies measured in millimetres). But, no, instead of saying “VW can produce stuff that doesn’t look like it fell from a truck and you will figure it out, too” he’s going overboard.

  • iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just marketing. Elon wants dumb tesla bros to think their truck is built that accuracy. No need for it to be reality.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sadly this could work, no one’s gonna be verifying this shit and the ones who do won’t reach enough tesla bros

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well his paranoia was fed (rightly) by sites like Reddit who ate his lunch over panel gaps on the model 3. He wants this to be better and there’s nothing wrong with that!

  • Square Singer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the full email he goes on to tell the engineer what a micron is.

    I guess, he just read that word somewhere and now feels cool that he knows it.

    It would be cute if he was a junior manager, but this way it’s just sad.

    • Echo71Niner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      You really think he wrote it? He has an army of engineers working for him, many of which would kill their mothers to get on Elon’s good side, corporate culture is same shit different smell no matter the corporation.

      • whats_a_refoogee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The leaked email has his name on it and the leak claims it was an email from Elon to employees. Can’t really tell if the leak is real or fake, but if it’s real then Elon is definitely the one who wrote it.

        Based on his proclivity to say dumb shit and his inability to keep his mouth shut, I’m inclined to believe it’s a real leak.

      • blady_blah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This 100% sounds like him. I don’t see any reason to doubt it given that if someone was going to make something up it wouldn’t sound like this.

  • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Due to the nature of Cybertruck, which is made of bright metal with mostly straight edges, any dimensional variation shows up like a sore thumb.​

    It sounds to me like the reasonable conclusion to draw from this would be to modify the design of the car. I’d also assume you don’t need tolerances to be the same for literally all parts inside and out. I’d also think that, if the car looks that bad if things are 10 or more microns out of place, these cars are going to age terribly after regular use.

    But what do I know? If I were smart, I’d be rich, right? And Elon is so rich, he must be a genius!

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are, and that undoubtedly gets under his sub micron thick skin, which is why he’s going overboard about it with this.

    • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah heat that mf up on a sunny day vs a cold day lol what an idiot.

      It’s not like “accuracies” doesn’t add up either ha ha what a genius.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Usually car makers solve the expansion and contraction using glue, curves, and trim to deal with expansion and contraction.

        The cybertruck has no curves and not much trim, the glue would have to be very flexible, which would lead to separation.

        I am going to bet that we will see cybertruck with panels flying off or flapping at highway speeds not long after release.

        • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yes, I’m all with you here, either make a frame and stick the “panels” to it individually (probably good if you make a cheap tank vehicle or something IDK) or make a chassis that take the deformation forces and distribute them as evenly as possible.

          My bet is they have him as a stupid publicity monkey drawing attention to Tesla, cybortryck etc (I mean all publicity is good right?) and away from bad things like Tesla didnt self drive end 2019(?) and still doesn’t, child labour, … etc

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      To build it with that accuracy would be physically impossible. Guess he forgot about thermal expansion and contraction. Guess he forgot about the weather…

      • schnokobaer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, it says cybertruck parts, not the whole thing including assembly. Certainly possible for some manufacturing processes under given conditions to produce parts with ±0.005 tolerances like laser cutting or precision CNC machining of small dimensions. But it’s obviously completely unrealistic given that most parts for a car will be of large-ish dimensions and stamped, injection molded, cast, forged, extruded… none of which lends itself to IT grades better than 10, far away from talking about microns.

        • AssPennies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t you see what musk said about legos and pop cans? It can be done, the tronk just needs to be built out of legos and pop cans, duh!

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A rumor I’ve heard somewhere online is that people are noticing the body panels wobbling, or ‘breathing’ in and out in the wind. Not sure how true that is, I can’t find a video showing this happening, but it does make sense. Even the most subtle flexing of a shiny flat surface becomes way more obvious and sticks out like a sore thumb.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Musk is a scammer who has almost no practical understanding of engineering.

        He (and unfortunately many after him) forgot about thermal expansion and contraction as well with his dumbass Hyperloop idea. Have a hermetically sealed metal tube with a vacuum run exposed for 200km and let’s just ignore thermal expansion. One station would have to move left and right for several meters throughout the day, every day for that, the 200km pipe somehow would need to be able to move about… His “designs” and “ideas” are engineering nightmares

      • botengang@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, not impossible people build stellarator type Fusion reactors with large freeform metal parts in that tolerance region that are exposed to liquid helium.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed, that’s about 10 to 100 times more accuracy than other automakers. Those tolerances just aren’t necessary so no supplier is going to have the tools or infrastructure in place to make parts to such a high degree. Body shop alone sees fluctuations in millimeters because industrial robots can’t do any better than half millimeter accuracy, if they’re brand new.

      • dohju@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you can even get something like +/-3 or 4 mm with say a cpk of 1,33 you are doing pretty well for a whole body.

        It’s probably a pr stunt. If this is real then they are doomed because they have not yet understood that you need to compensate tolerances and design a robust assembly that can handle this. If you are trying to get crazy high part precision you have not understood how big scale manufacturing works. This is why the Japanese are often so highly regarded in this and might be the true art of car (or large scale) engineering.

  • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hilarious considering the panel gaps in all his other cars, dude is fucking insane. Unattainable standards don’t breed better work they breed exasperation and apathy.

  • Im14abeer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon gonna engineer the shit outta this thing. Nevermind coil steel itself varies by more than that before it goes into a die and stretches. It’s almost like he doesn’t have any background in automotive manufacturing. This statement makes me think Elon may not know what a micron even is. The fit and finish of Tesla’s current offerings seems to evidence it anyway.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two things, not necessarily related.

    1. The cybertronk looks highly regarded when put together correctly. Imagine if it has the panel gaps of other cars TSLA makes.

    2. My tinfoil hat theory on why Elon is acting all right wing all of the sudden is to get those idiots to buy electric bare metal Pontiac Aztecs with “unbreakable” windows instead of F-150’s

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      My tinfoil hat theory on why Elon is acting all right wing all of the sudden is to get those idiots to buy electric bare metal Pontiac Aztecs with “unbreakable” windows instead of F-150’s

      can he recoup $44 billion tho…? it’s a bold move.meme

      wouldn’t it be nice to have some kind of logical explanation for his demented thrashings?

      • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think he actually cares about the money he blew on Twitter. Money is a construct and that is even more true for rich people. If he cared about the money, he wouldn’t have tossed Twitter down the shitter.

        I think he cares more about the impression he is making, whether it be good or bad. People are talking about Elon and that’s all that matters.

      • zepheriths@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I don’t know the cost to develop the cyber truck assuming it was 0 dollars to make the cost of the Twitter deal from cyber truck alone, it would take 88 thousand of them at elon getting 100% of the money from the sales. ( how he expects to sell an electric truck for 50k is beyond me)

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      My theory is he’s a wealthy dude, so he’s going to have right wing tendencies since the right wing benefits wealthy dudes.

      Also, one of his kids came out as trans, he went nuts, blamed social media for making his kid a “degenerate”. Then bought twitter to destroy it out of revenge.

      He’s kinda like a James Bond villain, but so much dumber.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      100% everyone is making fun of teslas already, so imagine how the people feel who pre-ordered some garbage years ago. Now with their “leaked” email they can tell people how their future car will have toleraces that are on an qtomic level. These are also the prople who believed that teslas can fly in 3 years. Which was in 2016 i believe

    • geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      88
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had exactly the same theory for 2. He seems to genuinely want to save humanity (reusable rockets, electric vehicles etc) and so converting right wingers to electric would fit the goal

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Bad news guys… We’re gonna have to delay production for just TWO MORE YEARS because of these woke microns! The good news though, you can get re-premium upgraded waitlist VIP positioning with a renewal deposit of only $500”