For example Night of the Living Dead and Starcraft are both content that you once needed to pay for but are now free.

Edit: The amount might be a little low. How much money would it take for you to say yes?

  • Extras@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honestly no thats a little too low price wise considering the amount of content I consume a year. Sure there are some good gems but not a year’s worth

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you weren’t explicitly excluding content that was always free, I’d consider it for $10, but by excluding that, you make it a miniscule amount of content that would be consumable.

        • Corroded@leminal.spaceOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s kind of what I was getting at. YouTube, itch.io, Spotify’s free tier, the radio, and so on would probably make just consuming free content pretty trivial these days.

          • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d argue that Spotify’s free tier would be content that you once had to pay for but is now free, as long as you were only listening to songs that were originally only available on albums that you’d have to buy (as opposed to, for example, podcasts.)

            • Corroded@leminal.spaceOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wouldn’t that include most streaming services though? A lot of shows and movies made for streaming services likely wouldn’t count but that still gives you a lot of content pre-2015’ish