• backgroundcow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How can it not be b? Every situation in the Portal games is already exactly like this, but with the portal fixed to a slab that moves with the rotation of the Earth, whereas in the drawing the portal moves as the sum of earth rotation + the movement of the train.

    • Shiki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the rule that’s literally in the game

      “Speed thing goes in, speedy thing comes out”

      Something isn’t moving goes in, it won’t move coming out. A hole having momentum won’t transfer it to what passes through the hole.

      Basic stuff

      • backgroundcow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But, “speedy” relative to what? Relative to the walls of the room your are inside? What if you are in a falling elevator? Relative to the rotating surface of the earth? To the center of the solar system? “Relative to the portal” is the only answer to that question that makes sense.

        • Shiki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Someone watched a YouTube video and think they know what they are on about…

          Portals don’t transfer energy, there is zero energy transferred to the people they are simply moving from one space to another

      • br3w0r@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But if we use coordinates relative to the orange hole, the whole world, including the rails and people on them, is moving, and the people are moving towards the hole with a speed of the train.

        • Shiki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That YouTube video was wrong, doesn’t even make sense

          It’s a hole, no energy gets transferred

  • KTVX94@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe it should be A. People aren’t moving, and the portal doesn’t carry momentum. At most people would be appearing on the other side with very little delay between eachother resulting in the most recently teleported person violently pushing away the last one.

      • rog@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its just a hole though. If you have a tennis racket with no strings and swing it over something stationary the object doesnt move

        • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          With the tennis racket analogy both portals would be moving. In the thought experiment from the image just one is moving, resulting in an unaccounted for momentum, unless the people shoot out the blue portal

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’d be B. It has to exit the portal at the speed it entered or you end up with a scunched up human or a stretched out human.

  • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Conservation of momentum says B I would think. From the protal’s reference frame, the people are moving fast toward it.

    • rog@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The portal is a hole. The hole is moving. The conservation of momentum is the hole moving as it continues to move along the track. If the people start moving, where does that momentum come from?

      Imagine a tennis racket with no strings. Two portals are stretched across the space the strings would normally be, back to back, one orange one blue. If you threw a ball in the air as if you were going to serve and swung the racket, the ball would pass straight through the portals as if they weren’t there and would fall straight down due to gravity. The ball maintains its conservation of momentum, and the tennis racket holding the portals also maintains its conservation of momentum as it swings through the air. There is no force applied by a hole.

      • critical@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lets say the tennis racket has 2 portals. One in the front and one in the back. When you swing the racket, the front portal moves forwards with some speed V. The portal on the back is moving backwards with the same speed, so -V (same speed V, but in opposite direction). A stationary ball, suspended in mid-air would have 0 speed. The racket portal approaches the ball at speed V, so the ball has a relative speed V to the racket. The portal on the back has a speed of -V and ven you combine that with the ball’s speed of V, we get -V+V=0. And so the ball stays put. The portals in the image are not both in motion. The front portal is approaching the people with a speed of V and so the relative speed of the people to the portal is V. The exit portal has a speed of 0, relative to the people. When the people go through the portal, their speed is 0+V=V, meaning they get launched out the exit portal with the same speed the entrance portal hit them.

        • rog@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting way to look at it, but I still dont see where the force is acting on the object going through the portal. The object is not in motion and will stay in that state unless something acts upon it, so where is the energy coming from to act on the object?

          • lauthals@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            To make it clear from the start: I agree 100% with B - there has to be movement, because without it, people wouldn’t come out of the portal at all. And if there is a movement, then the only reasonable speed would be that of the train.

            But: Your question about the energy is still interesting. It must come from somewhere. And I think, the only source, from which it can come, is the train. That is, the train would lose energy and therefore slow down.

            • Shiki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The portal moves towards the people. It’s a hole. Momentum won’t transfer from nothing as the hole is the one moving.

                • Shiki@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because the portal is moving them through it

                  Like how you would move through a hoop if it passed through you, it’s just a door through space

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservation of momentum is based on Newton’s first law which states “a body at rest tends to stay at rest” so that would imply A. not B.

      Those dudes were just chilling, and would still be laying there chilling.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but the momentum is relative to the portal.

        If the blue exit portal was behind the wagon and so moving at the velocity of the orange entry portal, then I would agree that it’s A because they move at the same velocity and in the same direction.

        But since the blue exit portal is static and the orange one is moving, the people will enter the portal at a relative velocity to the portal which will be transferred to the blue one. Meaning B will occur.

        If the portals were on two wagons going in the opposite directions at the same X velocity, then the people would enter at X relative velocity and exit at 2X velocity.

      • Platomus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, in perspective of the initial orange portal the people are moving. They aren’t at rest compared to the portal. The portal is at rest.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Conservation of momentum would suggest A, otherwise an outside observer would see momentum generated from nowhere right?

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It needs to be 2. Otherwise all the people will materialize inside eachother. In fact, everyone will be deposited onto the 2-dimensional pane of the blue portal itself, like an infinitely thing coat of paint, absolutely smearing them.

    Think about it. As your fingertips enter the orange portal, they materialize at the entrance of the blue portal. Then your wrist enters the orange portal, where does it materialize at the blue portal?

    • If your fingers shift to make room, then that has imparted momentum and it’s option B.
    • If you continue to materialize on the other side of the portal like a mirror image, then for all intents and purposes the blue portal is also moving at the same speed as the orange portal, even if orange ring appears still.
    • If your fingertips don’t have momentum and your wrist materializes at the portal, then your wrist is occupying the same space as your fingertips. Congratulations, you’re now a paste.

    For whatever reason I feel more willing to break conservation of momentum than I am to

    • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Good explanation.

      This has the interesting implication that the relative speed between the portals is “added” to whatever goes through it.

      Example: the blue portal is on a train running with the same speed in opposite direction. The people-bundle would instantaneously be accelerated to twice the speed of each of the trains. (This becomes a real headscratcher if you were able to put the portals in a particle accelerator)

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s two dimensional in the sense that the surface of the portal is a plane, through which things pass.

        So as things pass through the portal, conservation of momentum is either preserved or it isn’t, with respect to a constant observer. What happens as they partly enter the portal in both of these situations?

        If momentum is preserved, and they have zero momentum going in to the portal, then they are motionless as they exit the portal. There is nothing to cause your hand to move out of the way for your arm. Scaled down to the atomic level, you become a paste.

        So you say that your hand moves out of the way because it is connected to your arm. The fact that it moves out of the way fast enough to make room for your arm means that it has velocity, and therefore momentum. The momentum means that it (and you) would get launched into the air, but conservation of momentum was violated.

        There is no scenario where you exit the portal motionless but intact.

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    B for sure. Consider a long pole (stationary relative to the track) entering the portal at the front of the trolley, it would leave the portal at the speed the trolley is moving.

      • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why the /s?

        It’s true. Obviously it makes for simpler puzzle design plus was easier to ignore the full capability (even the version in 2 seems to just work enough to allow the set-piece), so it seems silly to use developer limitation as a gotcha.

  • Bram@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This platform deserves a community solely dedicated to trolley memes.

  • Sharp312@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love this comment section. Perfect balance of people actually trying to discuss and people getting pissy because their answer can be the only right one.

    I don’t know shit but when I try and picture it happening in my head I can only see A being correct, think Doctor Strange portals. When he moves a portal the person comes out stationary

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    B.

    Speedy thing goes in. Speedy thing comes out.

    Although it kind of depends how fast the tram is going.

  • Zithero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    A, the people are traveling towards the portal, not the other way around.

    If they were falling/running at the portal it would be different.

    Here the portal is moving forward towards them, they have no momentum.tk travel through the portal.

  • SecretPancake@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think portals carry the momentum with them. It’s as if the train is a moving tunnel. So A.

      • InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Games and real life are the same! Now if you’ll excuse me I’m going to jump off a bridge then use an energy drink to heal my broken bones.