Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoCombining two different internet debatessopuli.xyzimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1176arrow-down14
arrow-up1172arrow-down1imageCombining two different internet debatessopuli.xyzFubarberry@sopuli.xyz to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squarePlayer2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoPortal would fail due to being placed on moving object
minus-squareEdge004@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoExcept for that one section in Portal 2 /s
minus-squareinsomniac_lemon@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy the /s? It’s true. Obviously it makes for simpler puzzle design plus was easier to ignore the full capability (even the version in 2 seems to just work enough to allow the set-piece), so it seems silly to use developer limitation as a gotcha.
Portal would fail due to being placed on moving object
Except for that one section in Portal 2 /s
Why the
/s?It’s true. Obviously it makes for simpler puzzle design plus was easier to ignore the full capability (even the version in 2 seems to just work enough to allow the set-piece), so it seems silly to use developer limitation as a gotcha.