• itsJoelle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is part of the reason I bicker with Liberals about appealing to electoralism all the damn time. Great, we technically got a “D” win, but the party installed a senator that doesn’t vote with the party and pulls the senate more “center” as they try to scoop up disaffected conservatives. So, they effectively installed their own opposition. Well done.

    Very much the smartest people in the room.

    Note: venting, and I’m not talking about individuals just the collective “wisdom” of belt-way liberals.

        • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For my own understanding, I want to have it explained to me how it was unhinged!

          Granted, voicing the take as I did pertaining to Manchin likely isn’t the smartest due to his electorate demographics, but I can recall a few cases where Democrat party officials threw their weight behind more center primary candidates as an appeal towards the center.

          Edit: I suppose my umbrige is with how those candidates coincidentally happen to favor neo-liberal tendencies and don’t advocate for working class or on environmental issues. Cause, man, what a dream it would be to have an actual left party as opposed to a center and right.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Liberal” in this context is from a socialist/communist lens. It’s not what the US calls “liberal”. It’s just another name for a capitalist, as in what Adam Smith defined. “Economic” liberalism.

      • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On Lemmy people deriding liberals are very often farther left, not conservatives.