• DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you pick a side, Intolerance is inevitable

    One side is literally founded on intolerance, while the other is based on intolerance towards those looking to oppress others. Your enlightened centrism will never make them equal, no matter how hard you try to convince yourself.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are more than two sides here. So far, I see tankies, fascists, anarchists, and leftists. And no, tankies don’t count as leftists.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see a bunch of people micro managing insignificant segments of the population to be apologist for right wing religious fascists

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Person I replied to is the one who mentioned two side (though I get the feeling you’re coming at this from the political compass point of view which is garbage in its own right).
        As for your assessment - no tankies don’t count as leftists, but anarchists sure do. Or do you consider ancaps to be anarchists? Because that’s a whole other pile of wrong.
        Either way, I’m seriously struggling to find the point of your reply.

          • DessertStorms@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Right, and hitler called himself a socialist, that didn’t actually make him one (feel free to read my discussion with op bellow where we go in to exactly this).

            Anyone with even a basic understanding of anarchism will tell you that capitalism is terminally incompatible with it, making an-cap an oxymoron and a made up thing to make upholders of the status quo feel like rebels.

            • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              All of that is certainly true, but anarchism is also terminally incompatible with reality. With no government, there’s nothing stopping some goon from raising a private army, declaring himself emperor, and killing anyone who tries to argue. That’s how we ended up with governments in the first place.

              • DessertStorms@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anyone with even a basic understanding of anarchism

                You’re clearly not there yet.
                Try reading up on what anarchism is actually about before you make such confidently incorrect assertions.

                • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A basic understanding of anarchism is that it’s a belief that government is unnecessary, harmful, and should be abolished.

                  I don’t know what you’re talking about, but it whatever it is, it clearly requires a non-basic understanding of anarchism, so why don’t you go ahead and educate me.

                • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve had some long conversations with anarchists. Seems to boil down to “everyone should just be nice to each other.” Let me know how that works out with people who don’t want to be nice.