• programmatica@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its hard to find middle ground btwn keeping spammers out, and the random mods who create silly rules “you cant post questions with vowels” “or you cant post pictures” …in a lawncare sub. Mods are good but they need very limited power.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see what you’re saying, but ultimately it’s a reputation thing. There will be a moderation team who hits your sweet spot of hands off versus removing annoying content.

      From a programmatic perspective designing infrastructure where people can’t remove things leads to the anarchy of usenet.

      But I’m hopeful that you will find a group that follows your moderation objectives and you can verify it like looking at the mod log. So it’s going to be all reputation anyway

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get what you’re staying, but frankly your OP question sounds pretty silly considering what the issue is.

      The idea is, everyone can run their communities as they like… Even with such stupid rules as no pictures in a lawn comm, or US politics only in a politics comm on a world instance. Kinda sad in such cases, but otherwise the mods and admins are there for mostly good reasons.

      You can almost always find comms or instances more to your liking, or try and start your own.