People here are at all different ages, maturity levels, and possibly have other issues like language barriers, all of which can contribute to a person being taken advantage of by typical advertising practices. If you don’t think this is an issue for you, that’s great, but that’s just like your opinion, man!

I will continue to keep the community clear of ways to extract money from the members.

The problem is with the original study. We don’t allow advertising or other ways that a person could extract money from our community. Some people are desperate for answers and it takes advantage of them. Sorry to be a pain!

Hi. You have broken the community rules by posting paywalled content. Since there was a lot of engagement I am giving you the opportunity to edit your post and copy the text here that is available and then remove the link.

This is still locked behind subscribing

It’s practice and it makes you better!

You never go full Neelix

Isn’t this what the Trump crowd tried to do when he lost the last election? Didn’t go so well.

You are nieve. Some sex workers enjoy their jobs.

Hello Satan!

You over estimate how much I care

Believe it or not, some of us don’t live in the USA or care about their elections 😃

It sounds like you are in a downward spiral. It’s time to pull yourself together and focus on self improvement. Forget about the relationship. Forget about drinking and drugs. If you can raise your self respect and confidence, you won’t fall for another person like this. Good luck!

Yup the same I had too

Being the devils advocate here but the quality of my teachers during school was worse than GPT4. They were more biased, made more errors, were more unfair, pushed more extremist views…

I think it could be as simple as party x claims they will do thing a, b, c and then after their term in power you assess if they achieved those things. The parties who make the claims will need to back up those claims with real milestones that would become performance indicators of partial or full success. The milestones must be easy to assess and leave no room for interpretation. Just like in a legal contract, if you make the wording too vague and hard to interpret, then your contract won’t be enforceable in court.

See my response above that takes this into consideration.

I guess the pandering people pleasing approaches would overly benefit from this design but it could be more realistic if you showed a percentage next to the answer of the likelihood that the party will follow through with the statement based on their previous claims and achievements. This would make the parties less willing to make false claims or go back on their promises once in power because it would reflect badly in the next election.

Yes. You should be presented with a set of multiple choice questions where the answers are each of the parties stances on the matter and at the end your vote should be divided among the parties based on how you answered the questions.