No. However, the FDP are basically terrorists at this point and will stop at nothing to praise the „Schwarze Null“
No. However, the FDP are basically terrorists at this point and will stop at nothing to praise the „Schwarze Null“
Im fine with republicans getting the secret detail they deserve.
France has repeatedly tried to hand over shared control of those nukes to Germany. I’d argue that this alliance is set in stone.
Europe is a nuclear power with second strike capability. „Practically disarmed„ is rather different
Im proposing building guillotines again. Just in case.
Wie war das? „wie es in den Wald hinein schallt…“ oder so?
It’s an investment? Just like an office building or a company car?
Depends. Is it stable? Does it pose a threat to passer bys ?
I‘d have to get my tables from work. It highly depends on the species, soil, size, location, age, natural area of the species and so forth. A decently sized oak at around 100-150 years old usually gets weighed in at around 2000€. Variation however is a given.
Trees prevent soil erosion, keep water clean, provide the basis for many beneficial insects and so forth and so on. They have a giant value in our financial system.
All of these views are valid. A tree has to be seen for what it can provide. If it’s more valuable to society and nature as a tree, leave it be. If other trees can gain from it being removed earlier than its natural decay demands, I’d argue to remove it.
„Bürgerliches Bündnis“- oder anders formuliert: „AfD ist schon geil autoritär“.
Please don’t.
I’d argue Dresden is rather nice, along with being home to some of these people, it would make them really feel their defeat I think.
If you can opt out of it, it’s not a tax. It’s an insurance. Taxes pay for everyone.
Since when should country size play a role in government support? There are planes ffs. If your military can operate in the middle of a desert with no utilities, you should be able to support a stable civilian management in rural places.
So far, „sky“ is pretty nice