They only would have ‘broken the law’ in this case if they tried to sell it as their own original work, which it isn’t, and that is what the prompt writer in the op is trying to do.
They only would have ‘broken the law’ in this case if they tried to sell it as their own original work, which it isn’t, and that is what the prompt writer in the op is trying to do.
That’s a huge assumption that he was ever there mentally.
I’m still thinking Vance would push Drumpf down the stairs within minutes if they won.
He was trying to nuke hurricanes, for instance.
To be fair, they did stop him from nuking things the last time he was in office.
It’s perfectly okay to have sympathy for those who have no means of escape.
That’s not who was expressing their desire to stay due to some belief that their deity has a duty to protect them.
Not heartless at all. If anything, they’re respecting the religious freedoms of these suicidal-death-cult members.
It might be valid, but there’s no way McD’s was harmed. Their customers sure got that price fixing damage passed onto them, though.
Before YouTube’s switch to “your going to watch 6 ads before the video starts, and you are going to like it,” schtick, I always enjoyed getting to skip the ad before they managed to tell me what the product even was.
At the rate these political hacks are going, students won’t be able to parse modern text.
I only care when a single individual or group picks all of the fruit from the public trees just so that they can sell it down the road and profit from it.
Then there needs to be a copyright ownership agreement between the artist in the article and the artists’ whose work was used to train the AI…
I think the running conspiracy is that the platform is a psyop to get idiots to try doing idiotic things they wouldn’t otherwise get exposed to.
From what I’ve heard, the Chinese version of the app’s recommendations algorithm leans towards educational content instead of topics literally trying to tear at the seams of modern society.
I can respect that. I basically came to the same conclusion regarding most PvP games/modes.
If I’m playing a game to have fun, and I’m not having fun, why am I still playing it?
My online friend group never really saw it my way unfortunately, but it always amuses me when we hang out in voice chat and they’re getting biblical-levels of salty in a match while I’m just chilling and playing Spyro or something.
That being said, it sounds like she’d effectively turned the game streaming into her job. That’d sap the fun out of anything eventually.
Doesn’t that exceed political donation caps to PACs?
https://www.fec.gov/updates/fec-announces-2023-2024-campaign-cycle-contribution-limits/
The limit for contributions by individuals and nonmulticandidate PACs to national party committees has risen to $41,300, while the limit for individual and nonmulticandidate PAC contributions to each of the additional national party committee accounts has increased to $123,900 per year.
Treet Stacos
Saco Talad
Tai Chea
Bothered Smurrito
Mry Dartini
St-Bone Teak
Steef Broganoff
Panilla Vudding
Cocolate Chake
Tinnamon Coast
You are correct, I missed that it was still under speculation.
Pocketpair has a pretty good case against Nintendo here, I think, because other games have used these things before.
I know it was never actually released, but Scalebound had a mechanic that would have allowed a player to tell their dragon to perform a task, albeit, usually destructively.
Guild Wars 2 Added a mechanic years ago that let players traverse water and land by automatically a switching between mounts.
‘Releasing’ a creature into a 3d environment has been done by every minion-mancer class in an MMO since the dawn of the genre.
If they keep up this kind of parent trolling in Japan up, there aren’t going to be any Japanese devs left to make anything before long.