There might be some bias involved based on the third paragraph:
The good news is that users can opt out of this data collection by deselecting it during the installation process. However, the process isn’t too straightforward either unlike AMD, which explicitly asks the user whether they want to opt out of data collection. Nvidia, however, enables and installs its Telemetry components by default and users are unable to opt out of it.
To me, the article title is biased clickbait because it implies Intel is worse than the other GPU options. But Nvidia has been doing the same shit for years.
Perhaps this is because they expect their readers to know Nvidia is a shit country, while Intel sits squarely in the “meh, they try at least” range?
I would add an entire paragraph titled “at least they’re doing better than Nvidia” but people are probably sick of hearing about the bloatware Nvidia installs in your computer.
There might be some bias involved based on the third paragraph:
How is it biased to point out whether you can disable telemetry and how simple it is to do so?
To me, the article title is biased clickbait because it implies Intel is worse than the other GPU options. But Nvidia has been doing the same shit for years.
But I’m not the person you replied to.
Perhaps this is because they expect their readers to know Nvidia is a shit country, while Intel sits squarely in the “meh, they try at least” range?
I would add an entire paragraph titled “at least they’re doing better than Nvidia” but people are probably sick of hearing about the bloatware Nvidia installs in your computer.
Claiming that Intel is not as shitty as Nvidia is pretty bold.
Uh by stating how it is during installation of beta drivers from the competition is bias?