pips@lemmy.film to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoUS scientists achieve net energy gain for second time in a fusion reactionwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down10cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mltech@kbin.socialtechnology@beehaw.orgscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up180arrow-down1external-linkUS scientists achieve net energy gain for second time in a fusion reactionwww.theguardian.compips@lemmy.film to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mltech@kbin.socialtechnology@beehaw.orgscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agoIt’s a good example. I’d actually say test-firing a rocket and claiming you’re almost on the moon is still misleading, though. Energy in vs. energy generated at the target has no practical significance. It’s for marketing to funders.
It’s a good example. I’d actually say test-firing a rocket and claiming you’re almost on the moon is still misleading, though.
Energy in vs. energy generated at the target has no practical significance. It’s for marketing to funders.