• MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The argument of cosmetic only microtransactions is also a bit of a weak one because it’s the sort of content that would usually just be in the base game, unlockable via gameplay or tied to cheat codes. At least this used to be the case.

      Cosmetic only is still better than other types but it’s still a case of the lesser of two evils.

      • dfc09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the only reason anybody says that is because we’re so desensitized by pay-to-win mechanics and games being released half finished with day 1 dlc to fill the gaps, so we say “at least it’s better than that”

        Remember horse armor? I bet there’s plenty of video games out now with cosmetic horse armor for sale.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We game for what we game for. Some people game for the cosmetics. They are selling what consumers buy. I’m not saying it’s right. But if they keep buying why wouldn’t they sell it?

      • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s wrong with it? Literally every single gameplay-related item in both Dota and CSGO are free. 100%, no strings attached. You can experience the entire game and what it has to offer without spending a dime. You have to charge for something. These companies aren’t making these game out of charity, they are in fact businesses.