![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4b788583-b053-483d-a1d0-e881d0f57ed0.jpeg)
![](https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/3d87a809-b49f-47a2-b46e-2d85d7d2f7a4.png)
Glad they didn’t make it a fpv drone 😂
Glad they didn’t make it a fpv drone 😂
Not a specialist, but I suppose it has to do with having different configurations for different top level folder. In Unix-like systems, every top level folder have a different purpose, and what works for the root may not for /tmp, /swap, etc.
In those example, no need to snapshot /tmp, as it is a forder whose file are bound to be deleted, and for which being able to restore has no use.
/swap is pretty similar , and is often formated with a dedicated filesystem.
/usr often only change during the package manager transactions, so snapshots are often tied to that, while /home may be set to keep daily snapshots.
Pedantic? Say the person that immediately assume anyone with a different opinion than his is a morron and did not read his previous message ?
Here is some gaming benchmark. It is from 2022, sure, but is still relevant today to illustrate that gaming performance on Linux isn’t as easy as being the “same software with different configuration”.
And I could go on with other games, which had different results.
There are many variables that can affect those performance. Obviously, the Kernel, Driver and Mesa version has a big influence, but so have some less obvious causes like the filesystem used, the compiler options used, or even the compiler itself. That’s why those performances can vary so much in benchmarks.
Phoronix many benchmarks proves the opposite. There is differences, even at the same Mesa/Kernel version.
The difference between an hyper optimized distro, like Clear Linux (optimized for Intel CPUs), and more general ones (Ubuntu, Fedora) can be huge.
Even between those general purposes distro, the technology choices (filesystem, scheduler, etc.) can make a considerable difference in some games/workloads.
A Queer Code Reader?
Too bad it is nVidia only.
So does it mean that Russia won’t be able to launch missiles from the Black Sea anymore? That may be a godsent to shuffle around air defenses elsewhere.
I agree that Ukraine deserves way more than Israel, but there is some important difference that explains why there is no such defense possible.
First, there is a lot of friendly countries between Israel and Iran, which allowed the interception of the missiles in their airspace. As such, aircraft could intercept those missiles with close to no risks. Is it possible in Urkraine ? No it isn’t.
Secondly Israel and Russia or both nuclear power, which Ukraine and Iran aren’t. Intercepting those missile make US and allies cobelligerent, which they seem ok with as Iran cannot meaningfully hurt them. It the case of Russia, it will mean having a war between two nuclear “superpower”, which mean a possible escalation toward whipping humanity, or at least a good chunk of it, from earth. No one can afford that.
:q!
Ukrainian army seem to love to use ironic means of destruction. Like use a GPS guided shell to destroy GPS jammers, or the like. So use a kamikaze UAV to target a kamikaze UAV production plant isn’t that far fetched.
Did you mean “purrrging”?
Sure, how else could her guards stay on her sides?
And I thought my cat whiskers were huge. Those are a category on their own.
Then he deserves his downvotes, not your insults.
In an ideal world, yes.
But unfortunately these days people prefer to follow blindly their bias and people validating said bias instead of investing the time required to investigate by their own mean, with least biased sources.
I’d blame social medias that make everything quasi instantaneous, but it is just a component of a whole, not the only cause.
deleted by creator
I won’t say that they are perfect, and are center-left leaning, but at least they enjoy a better credibility ratting than BiC.
I can’t say for Eurogamer, I have no data. Feel free to ask any reputable fact checking website for a check.
I’m only pointing that for potentials reader to know that the website isn’t known to be factual and do not have a very high credibility. I’d do the same for any left leaning website.
Looks alright to me.