• Stumblinbear@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They also had ads, which they’d no longer gain revenue from. Ads can pull in $3-5 per month per user. That’s a massive loss.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apart from the ones that pay. You only need to look at any of the sync posts on here to see there are many, many of them.

          • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ad revenue very often dwarfs the income from subscribing users by a huge margin. Sure, a single user subscribing pays for themselves plus a little extra, but your free users make up 70-80% of your revenue

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but again - removing the app takes away 100% of the revenue. Keeping it as subscription only gets you some revenue. Some > none.

              • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The amount of people that subscribe would likely not pay for the ongoing maintenance costs unless he’s willing to work for shit pay