For some women in China, “Barbie” is more than just a movie — it’s also a litmus test for their partner’s views on feminism and patriarchy.

The movie has prompted intense social media discussion online, media outlets Sixth Tone and the China Project reported this week, prompting women to discuss their own dating experiences.

One user on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu — a photo-sharing site similar to Instagram that’s mostly used by Gen Z women — even shared a guide on Monday for how women can test their boyfriends based on their reaction to the film.

According to the guide, if a man shows hatred for “Barbie” and slams female directors after they leave the theatre, then this man is “stingy” and a “toxic chauvinist,” according to Insider’s translation of the post. Conversely, if a man understands even half of the movie’s themes, “then he is likely a normal guy with normal values and stable emotions,” the user wrote.

  • doggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    264
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    Women in the US are doing that too.

    I guess it works, to a point. If your man throws a Shapiro-esque fit over this movie he probably isn’t great to be around the rest of the time.

    • rosenjcb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      His critique of it is basically that it’s too “woke” but he really has nothing to say about the essential elements of any movie (plot, tone, character development, etc). He’s either unable or unwilling to separate politics from his review. It’s like he doesn’t know a movie can be well made even if you disagree with its themes.

      • LeftEndDev@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you ever have (unfortunately) heard of his absolutely dogshit book, then his inability to understand deeper meanings, subtext, themes, and to grapple with a competent plot should not surprise you in the least. Robert Evans, Cody Johnston, and Katy Stoll read it through on Behind The Bastards in a few episodes. Imagine the novelization of a Steven Seagal movie adaption of a Jack Ryan plotline. Combine that with how ol Benny really wanted, and failed, to be a screenplay writer, and it makes sense his absolute hatred for modern Hollywood movies that don’t say all the things he likes.

      • Cralder@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Pretty sure he decided what he was going to say before he even saw the movie. He can’t admit to liking any part of it becausee of his politics.

      • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I seen a video of another person dismantling his arguments and plot and character development is something he touches on.

      • Hype@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        The amount of concern a woman should have about their partner is directly related to the amount of Shapiro that is displayed when complaining about Barbie. I had a few parts I didn’t like, but I still enjoyed the movie as a whole. I thought the car chase scenes were so unnecessary and terrible product placement.

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        What’s funny is Shapiro, himself, feels Shapiro-esque as if even he were not the genuine article but instead a trick of the light.

    • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Both my wife and i wanted to go equally. I wanted to thirst on Ken and I did…but on the serious note, its a good movie for both genders to see for seperate but equal reasons. Barbie gotta stand up and step out, be herself. and Ken has to learn what it means to be Ken without Barbie. This movie would of helped me not be such an incel in my formative years.

        • Trapping5341@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Lol she actually wants to go watch the movie about child trafficking. Personally I want to drive 3 hours to watch Oppenheimer on 70mm because I didn’t know it was even a thing before this movie. Though all imax was created decently equal 😂

    • WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      It can also work both ways, by seeing how she sees the corporate feminism thrown around by power-hungry corpos only for the profit. Luckily, my gf and I were sharing the same “yeah, it’s still divisive and murican corpo trash” mentality about the movie, while both of us saying that it was “almost there”

  • Arotrios@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have to admit, Barbie becoming a Chinese feminist icon was not on my 2023 bingo card. Anyone taking bets on when we’re gonna get a kpop version of this classic?

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Barbie starting the revolution in China? Hopefully other countries as well. Good timeline.

      • Nix@merv.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No it’s not lol

        Their political leaders are billionaires, the workers don’t own any means of production, there’s terrible workers rights, etc.

        • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s how communism always ends up. When you hand over majority of the power to the state, it won’t be keen on giving it back.

          That’s like saying the US is not capitalist because we don’t have a true free market and better products/services don’t always rise to the top.

          These simply aren’t things that can practically happen, just like the workers owning the means of production.

          • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That doesn’t make any sense though. Communism isn’t when you “give power to the state.” It’s a word used to describe a specific economic system that China does not have. The word that best describes what I think you’re getting at is “authoritarian.” Words mean things, and if a thing doesn’t fit the definition of a word, then it isn’t that word.

          • HellAwaits@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Tell me you don’t understand any economic system without telling me you don’t understand any economic system

    • MrApples@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well they included the nine-dash line in the movies silly map (I believe Vietnam banned the movie because of this) and there’s no zombies or Winnie the Pooh references so all good as far as the CCP goes.

  • spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think if anyone gets mad at a Barbie movie or some random article on the internet that has nothing to do with them, that’s a good sign they’re emotionally unstable

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d call it emotionally immature.

      A surprising number of the people I grew up or work with act like they’re still in high school when it comes to social/interpersonal skills – these people are all well over 30 years old.

      • ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s very obvious here that no one is saying “if you don’t like a Barbie movie then you’re sexist.” The point is if you don’t agree with equality, whether in a movie or irl, then that’s the problem. But I feel like you probably already know this.

        But yes, if people from certain religions and political parties would just stop with the racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia, maybe people wouldn’t feel the need to express cultural values the oppression they’re experiencing. Maybe consumers wouldn’t identify so much with the message of films like this. Yet somehow it’s always positive media like this that gets pushback, and meanwhile, laws keep getting passed in bumfuck states that are stripping human rights from people one by one. But sure, Barbie is the “exhausting” issue here.

        In other words, maybe there wouldn’t be media “pushing” for equality if we already had it.

        And idk, I find Marvel/superhero bullshit to be exhausting and immature and just bad, so I don’t watch any of it, I block everything about it on lemmy and reddit, and I don’t comment on it. Then it’s not exhausting anymore.

    • zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      People are free to be mad at anything as they please as long as they dont harm to other people.

      Or maybe people should not be mad at news article of Russia invading Ukraine for no reason?

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      11 months ago

      Define “mad”. I’ve watched it (arrr) myself and The Barbie movie is very political, despite them completely hiding it in the trailers and the promotional material.

      Fervent political media tends to rile people up, especially when it’s very one-sided. I presume you haven’t seen it and think people are upset over a light hearted comedy.

      • mashbooq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s only political if you think human rights are political. For normal people who care about other people, it’s a light hearted comedy

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Human rights are political by definition. Feminism is political by definition. That the average person (or at least the ones worth knowing) is a feminist, whether they know it or not, doesn’t mean the ideas aren’t political in nature.

          The problem is that people think political means bad or controversial instead of, you know, relating to concepts of governance and self rule.

        • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          43
          ·
          11 months ago

          The fact that I don’t want to go to the movies to watch propaganda doesn’t mean I’m against that propaganda. I go there to be entertained.

          • dangblingus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You didn’t reply to their comment, you just added your own idiotic take. The movie isn’t propaganda unless you think a story about women and men having equal rights and equal opportunity is propaganda.

            Is The Matrix propaganda? Is Terminator propaganda? Is Star Trek propaganda? All entertaining movies, all have heavy social commentary.

            • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              I haven’t seen the Barbie movie. I have no idea what it’s like. My comment was about “propaganda” movies in general

          • Torvum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            27
            ·
            11 months ago

            You’ll get nothing from communists in this discussion friend. People refuse to allow our media to be escapism anymore and demand even already addressed issues drilled into ‘entertainment’. We traded pop culture references for this, and somehow I want the references back

            • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              The Barbie movie is still escapism, media in general is still escapism. Media has always contained messages or lessons or political meaning, it’s not a new thing, nobody’s disallowing anything. If you don’t like today’s media, maybe it’s because you don’t like the messages they contain anymore. Sometimes you gotta look inward before blaming things on “society”.

            • dangblingus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              EvErYoNe WhO dIsAgReEs WiTh Me Is A cOmMuNiSt. You’re not even aware at how much of a self-report you’re doing.

      • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not one-sided, though. It argues that both matriarchy and patriarchy are not inclusive ways of operating a society. The movie did not shy away from showing Ken’s dissatisfaction living under a matriarchy, just like it did not shy away from showing Gloria and Sasha’s dissatisfaction with living under a patriarchy

        • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I liked that it at least gave a few nods to the idea that living in a patriarchy isn’t necessarily great for all men either. Not all men have power, and even the ones that do aren’t necessarily happier for it and find themselves competing with other men and restricting their own self-expression. That’s a nuance that’s lost in a lot of pop feminist messaging.

          • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Absolutely! The dolls of both genders that were discontinued or discarded were the first ones to bring down the patriarchy in Barbie land, including Allan and Sugar’s Daddy/Magic Ring Ken

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly the way actual feminism does instead of the conservative boogeyman “feminism” that’s just female chauvinism espoused by an extreme minority.

      • spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If it’s talking about equality then it’s not political. People’s lives are not political they are not objects for other people to react to. Touch grass.

        • littlewonder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There are only two categories: the status quo (no matter how shitty it might be for some populations) and “political”.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    58
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you base your relationship on a fucken Hollywood movie then that should be a litmus test in and of itself.

    Also, guys, if your girlfriend constantly feels the need to “test” your relationship, then she’s not the right one. Thats a massive red flag.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean there’s no harm in using a cultural moment as a starting point to see if two people are compatible?

      I think the language in the article and perhaps from the influencers is a bit rigid.

      I don’t think anyone is suggesting that if a man has valid reasons for disliking the movie they are automatically exist. The idea is that the film is causing a knee jerk reaction in men who are otherwise prone to hiding their misogyny.

      I didn’t get a lot of the inside jokes about the product. And the barbies and Ken’s did not unite to kill Will Ferrell.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not basing the relationship off of the movie. It’s just a way to test if any red flags come up.

      • Sjatar@sjatar.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it’s healthy to observe your partners reaction to things. Especially when it comes to things that are quite important for a long term relationship, like their thoughts about gender roles. If you organically went to see the movie and your partner is clearly displaying red flags from it, then that’s just good (not the red flags but that you now know).

        I guess the trickery of going to assess them specifically can be seen as a asshole move. But I think it’s a good move compared to alternatives ^^

        • SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Being manipulative is a good alternative compared to just being direct and asking your partner what they think? I’m sure someone who is going to throw a fit about the Barbie movie will be happy to tell you what they think about feminism if you just ask.

          • Sjatar@sjatar.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t see it as more manipulative then to ask leading questions to assess anybodies stance on subjects ^^ Especially when it’s a way to shield yourself from real harm that might be caused by the party you are probing information from.

            • SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you’re worried about real harm this person should not be your partner. It doesn’t matter what they think about a movie.

        • Torvum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Movies are not a good basis on someone’s perception of anything. Their interactions with reality are.

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wanting to test if your new boyfriend is a misogynist is hardly a red flag. The article doesn’t say anything about testing dudes constantly.

      • ClarkDoom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think that’s fair. The “feminism” shown in the movie is highly reductive and at times completely out of touch. I liked the movie as a whole but the women forming a plan to distract the men while they take over the world behind their back completely eliminated the possibility of this being a movie that could serve as a good model for feminist arguments. Equality isn’t reached by tricking people or politically disenfranchising the other sex on purpose. It’s done by moving forward together. This movie showed the men being terrible and then showed us that women should fight back by being just as terrible? I think you can see how this isn’t really a good feminist argument or one that is so solid that it should receive universal support from every audience member. Especially if you’re gonna argue someone is a misogynist if they didn’t agree with the movies take.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Seeing a movie with someone is part of your experience with them, through which you determine their personality and character, is it not?

      I agree that “testing” people is kind of toxic, but the idea that your assessment of a person isn’t cumulative and inclusive feels odd.

  • Psyduck_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I thought the movie criticizes both extreme feminism and male chauvinism, or did I watch a different Barbie movie?

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s what the article is saying as well.

      Any gendered chauvinism sucks and patriarchy causes suffering to anyone.

      And if someone comes out of the movie angered by this knowledge, they can be a troublesome person to other people.

    • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah. Barbie Was not the good guy in the Barbie movie, right? Like, even in the end they admit that they will not give the Kens true equality, just enough that they basically won’t revolt again. People here calling Barbie a feminist icon, what movie were you watching?

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Obviously she wasn’t the good guy. She developed a nuclear bomb for heaven’s sake. To be fair I did fall asleep for a bit but I’m pretty sure I got the big plot points.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Lmfao what the actual fuck?

          I didn’t watch the movie, nor do I know anything about the premise, so seeing that comment and thinking about Barbie the toy is absolutely hilarious…

          • T4V0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            He’s making a joke about Barbenheimer…

      • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s the point. They blatantly say “someday, the Ken’s will have as much rights as women do in the real world”

        The entire point is that treating people as second class like thst isn’t good, regardless of which side its coming from and that we should all be equal. The only time I’d see men complaining about that is when they don’t get it.

      • T4V0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Like, even in the end they admit that they will not give the Kens true equality, just enough that they basically won’t revolt again.

        That example isn’t really accurate, they say the Kens eventually will be given the same representativity as the women in the real world. That line is more of a jab against gender inequality than anything.

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure but it’s still them making a conscious choice to keep oppressing a group until an unrelated reality fixes their shit. Doesn’t sound like they’re good guys at all tbh.

          • T4V0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sure but it’s still them making a conscious choice to keep oppressing a group until an unrelated reality fixes their shit.

            I hope you see the irony in that phrase.

            Doesn’t sound like they’re good guys at all tbh.

            This isn’t Star Wars my dude, not everything needs to be good vs evil. Sometimes there’s even room for satire.

          • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah the movie doesn’t paint them as good guys though? The narrator comes in and states that they aren’t at that point, and stereotypical Barbie leaves because she can’t see herself as taking part in such a system anymore.

      • friendlymessage@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think that was the point, it’s the perfect mirror to the real world. Everyone not okay with how the Barbies treat the Kens in the end should think for a second why that is and why anyone should accept the reverse in the real world.

        • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s also kind of a clever subtle call to action. “If you don’t like this ending, you can change it by changing things in the real world.”

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Stereotypical Barbie” (the Margot Robbie one) actually seems to get it by the end. In fact, her main character arc was going from being like the other barbies—watered down stereotypes of feminism—to actually a feminist who has a better grasp of why just equalizing out positions of power, while still good, does not address the root of patriarchy.

        • ikiru@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Okay, I’ll admit I had not the slightest clue what the plot was to Barbie before opening this post but I’m getting a little curious about this movie now.

      • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It didn’t end up in a world that’s ready. More like a mirror of the real world but maybe healthier?

    • IceMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is indeed what is in Barbie - if you watch it and actually think about the themes. If you’re just there for the experience then the message is (quote moviegoer behind my back discussing with friends): “goddamn, this is a step in right direction, we won’t change this patriarchal world with one film however“ :P

      On a basic level the message “Ken was silly, broke Barbieworld because he wanted to emulate men, they had to get Barbie and a feminist back to fix it” - and that’s what most people will get out of Barbie.

      • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        On a basic level the message “Ken was silly, broke Barbieworld because he wanted to emulate men, they had to get Barbie and a feminist back to fix it”

        How did he break it? He basically just flipped the genders so Kens are the ruling/working class and Barbies are just subservient eye candy. Barbie just flipped it back. It’s a broken and unimaginably unfair world in either case.

        When Kens ask just for a bit of equality at the end, they are shut down and given some unimportant appeasement as a joke.

        • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          When Kens ask just for a bit of equality at the end, they are shut down and given some unimportant appeasement as a joke.

          The movie is calling this out on purpose. It’s how women are currently treated in western society.

    • T4V0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      criticizes both extreme feminism

      Tbh I didn’t see any real critic to extreme feminism, I only saw them holding a mirror to society in general (with the obvious reversed gender dynamics). Is there an example?

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Lmfao “extreme feminism”
      “tHeY wAnT eXtReMe eQuAlItY!1!1” smdfh

      [citation needed]

      (and no, men being generalised against as shits is not an act of extremism no matter how uncomfortable it made you feel lol get back to me when the levels of harm become even close to being comparable)

  • Phoebe@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    My boyfriend and i can’t wait to watch this movie 😊 💕 (but cinema got expensiv dudeee 🥲)

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      As a man, I would say sort of. The movie does not shy away from a very obvious feminist message combined with an unsubtle (hilarious) spoof of toxic masculinity. On the other hand, it’s still a matter of personal taste. I really liked the movie, but I could see how someone would find it a bit too simplistic and formulaic in its story, completely independent from its themes. Not liking female directors in general just because they’re female is complete bullshit though.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        To be fair it doesn’t say the boyfriend has the like the movie, just understand it and not bash it mindlessly.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I haven’t seen it, but the criticism I’ve heard is that the feminist message is a pretty obvious one and not very deep. I guess you don’t go to the Barbie movie to “make you think”, but I’ve also heard that the movie spends a bit too long on that obvious message and it gets boring at parts. I think the majority of criticisms aren’t about the message itself, more about the execution of it.

        Buuutt this is the internet and the ridiculous voices are always the loudest lol

    • Rayspekt@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know I one should derive a scientific test out of it, but if a guy gets batshit crazy over the movie, then he might not have the best relation towards independent women.

    • Amilo159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s not a movie for my taste as I prefer to watch sci-fi, action, thriller or historical themed movies. So if I was forced or coerced into seeing it, I would probably hate it too. Then again, I haven’t seen it so don’t really know for sure.

        • Amilo159@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s actually a very good point that I didn’t even realise. I did say “hate it” but didn’t mean hating the movie, simply disliking and not enjoying the time.

          I guess it’s become far too easy to use extreme words in our daily speech nowadays, for which I blame social media.

      • expr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I tend to prefer similar movies as you and I loved the movie. It is a VERY fantastical, intelligent, existential, and heady movie. It’s one of the most expert navigations of complex social dynamics I’ve ever seen and has an absolute shitload of cinema references and easter eggs to boot.

        Don’t let the surface fool you. The franchise is just a vehicle for Greta’s ideas to reach a mass audience.

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The franchise is a vehicle to sell barbies.

          Mattel decided this was the best way in the current cultural mood.

          • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s like saying The Lego Movie and the Lego Batman movie were a vehicle to sell Legos. That’s pretty obviously not all they were, and just because they could sell toys that doesn’t mean they weren’t also good movies.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I second your opinion and I’m a woman. I just never liked the franchise, no matter how good the movie is, I don’t think I’d enjoy watching it either.

        • Hera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          You might not like it, but I have huge barbie issues and went with my 11 yo thinking it would be okay and poke a but of fun and have a slightly feminist bent. I truly loved every minute and am surprised how much I did. It is formulaic but done really well.

          • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            11 months ago

            Won’t be surprised if dumb. Lots of that going around these days, especially regarding this topic.

        • Amilo159@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh so having a taste means being toxic or fragile now?

          Clearly it’s Your toxic insecurity that can’t handle others have different taste than you. You’re just insecure fragile female in that regards.

          • avater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            having a taste does not mean to show hatred. You can simply dislike something and you’re done.

            But if you show hatred to a movie, a show, a book and the people who worked on that (actors, directors…) I think you have some issues. And that’s what this article is about right?

    • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know if it’s defininitive, but I do think it offers good insight into what a person notices when they watch things. There’s a whole lot to notice and think about in the movie

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      No. The movie is very antagonistic towards men. I don’t think anyone who has seen the movie can dispute that in good faith.

      Practically every male character in both the Barbie world and the real world is portrayed negatively. There are a few exceptions that are portrayed neutrally but they are mostly plot or exposition devices.

      Conversely, practically every female character is portrayed positively. This creates a stark contrast that’s very difficult to ignore.

      To be clear - personally I don’t care, it takes more to rile me up. But hating a movie that is deliberately spiteful towards your demographic is not an abnormal reaction. Neither is “slamming” the people who made it.

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Man here. I disagree.

        The movie is only “antagonistic towards men” if you think the Kens are somehow supposed to be a 1:1 realistic depiction of real life men which is something not only not textually supported but also actively and explicitly contradicted by the film

        The kens aren’t stupid because they’re men, they’re stupid because they’re Ken Dolls. Both Kens and Barbies are highly hyperbolic depictions of how little girls play with Barbies and Kens.

        Personally, I found the movie to be very empowering as a man too. I’d recommended rewatching it and trying to think critically about what the movie is doing. It’s a film, not an after school special where every character is supposed to be a direct black-and-white representation of “thing good” or “thing bad”

      • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do you really not see that’s how women are typically treated in movies? They’re just there to be arm candy to the men, don’t have real personality or depth, and just exist to make the men feel good about themselves.

        It’s just funny to watch dudes get so riled up about how kens are treated, especially when at the end the Kens do get their own story arc. Unlike how women are treated in nearly all movies.

      • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s antagonistic towards the patriarchy. You completely misunderstood the Ken plot and are the one arguing in bad faith.

        In fact, your response is exactly why some people view the movie as a good way to see what an individual pays attention to and whether or not they genuinely understand what the film is critiquing and why.

        You failed.

  • •••@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s interesting. I read that the film was about radical feminism, but gender switched with Ken as the feminist to overthrow the Barbie-dominating system. Really look forward to seeing the movie.

    • hawkguy@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think that analogy doesn’t work a 100 %. But I guess you could say that the film explores something like that.

      But go ahead and watch the film. I enjoyed it very much.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      My understanding is that the film undercuts most of its social commentary and ends up a wash, so watch it for the absurd interpretation of barbie life.

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s also incredibly ham fisted and decides to tell and not show. The jokes were pretty funny though.

  • tenitchyfingers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Correct. Honestly, if a dude gets offended by a movie that says “hey dude, learn how to love and value yourself without basing all of your sense of self on your romantic relationship to a woman and you’ll be much happier”, they are NOT a catch at all and they need to shed some shit about their lives.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The only reason I have any interest in it is all the conservative jimmy-rustling it’s doing.

      • socsa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        This. I tried to buy bud light but it’s legitimately awful. Seeing barbie twice is a way better option.

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly I was the same way going into it, and after watching it my thoughts were “I don’t regret watching it, but I wouldn’t have regretted missing out either.”

      The movie is great, and there were multiple moments where I burst out laughing. It’s also a really bizarre acid trip, and I mean that in a good way! But at the end of the day, it’s a hot pink version of The Lego Movie, down to Will Farrell playing a (less evil and more well-meaning) Lord Business. It’s a movie made by women, for women, about a series of toys designed for women. That’s not a bad thing by any means, and it’s not like men cannot enjoy it, but it also means it may not interest you, and that’s fine too.

      • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Is it really as critical of capital as The Lego Movie was? I haven’t seen it yet, though I intend to.

        Fox Business, among other right-wing news outlets, were foaming at the mouth about how The Lego Movie was anti-capitalist. Search up “Lego movie anti capitalist” on your preferred search engine to see what I mean.

        • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Mmmmm, I don’t think I’d go that far, no. Feminist? Very much so. Unable to decide if the Mattel executives are actually antagonistic because Mattel didn’t want to make themselves look too bad? Probably.

    • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same, I just can’t bring myself to care about a movie that’s about toys I have zero nostalgia for.

      • dditty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I had no prior experiences with any Barbie-related products or media (adult cis white male in the US) and wasn’t sure whether I’d enjoy it at all. After seeing it, i honestly think there’s something for everyone in this movie. It’s exceptionally well-written (very wry) and makes solid points about the current state of patriarchy in our society. It’s really well-done. Feel free to wait for it to come out on streaming, but then I’d definitely recommend checking it out.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      “If you love barbie you’ll love the movie!”

      “If you hate barbie you’ll love the movie!”

      Idgaf about barbie so I didn’t bother watching.

    • Ado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Of course. I don’t care for Barbie either, and never played with the toys during childhood so there’s no connection for me. I went to watch with my fiance because it was something she was interested in. The movie was okay. Wasn’t great, wasn’t horrible. I think when it becomes telling is when people are somehow offended or pretend like it’s the worst movie created.

    • DrM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why wouldnt it? It’s also cool if you dislike the movie, it’s not cool if you dislike female directors “because of this movie”

    • mayo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      My interest in upbeat movies has never been very high. If it were a thriller or mystery that’d be cool. I’d watch. It’s ok we can pass on this one.

    • guangming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t get why you’d think it would be censored? If anything the movie skewers US capitalism, so the CCP would probably be happy for folks to see it.

    • panCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Since a while hollywood has been making movies keeping china and its censorship in mind !

  • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    … if a man shows hatred for “Barbie” and slams female directors after they leave the theatre, then this man is “stingy” …

    Didn’t knew there were that many female directors in China. Let alone having to watch their back to not get sucker-punched for it.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      if a man understands even half of the movie’s themes, “then he is likely a normal guy

      And when ask about the movie, if he says “she’s hot” and starts masturbating?

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    According to the guide, if a man shows hatred for “Barbie” and slams female directors after they leave the theatre, then this man is “stingy” and a “toxic chauvinist,” according to Insider’s translation of the post

    Nothing against female directors, but the movie went from pretty damn good to pretty damn boring after a while.

    You’ve got a fun and quirky beginning that makes light fun of barbie, mattel and patriarchal society. Then you’ve got the bits where

    spoiler

    Barbie and Ken get to the real world, get arrested twice for doing stupid shit.

    This part was funny and for a bit there I felt like it was mainly not about driving a message home, but still had SOME things to say. Great! Then you’ve got the parts where

    spoiler

    Ken went on his own journey to discover patriarchy (which he thought had something to do with horses and was disappointed to find out it didn’t), Barbie meets her owner’s daughter, goes to Mattel HQ, then gets chased out and rescued by her owner.

    Many hilarious moments here, poking lots of fun at patriarchy again, but it never felt like it was too on the nose. I mean I kinda expected that from the trailers and everything.

    Where the movie started changing for me was when

    spoiler

    Barbie, her owner, and the latter’s daughter went back to the Barbie world to help fix the balance, only to find out that the Kens had completely taken over.

    While the twist was predictable, it was still interesting because I wanted to know how they would resolve it. But it just kinda… fell off after that? At this point you have the expected low point in the protagonist’s life, and then they figure out how to fix everything, but it was just so… boring and uninspired somehow. By this point, the movie’s quirky and fun nature has worn down its’ course and the

    spoiler

    battle of the Kens

    just did nothing for me anymore.

    What’s worse, I was expecting

    spoiler

    the Mattel board of directors, particularly Will Ferrell’s characters to be villains and instead they just… arrived by the end of the movie and had a change of heart.

    That subverted my expectations for sure, but not in a good way whatsoever. Slightly reminiscent of the last seasons of Game of Thrones.

    And lastly, I really expected the resolution of the plot to have something to do with horses and I was sorely disappointed about that too.

    TL;DR: Movie starts out great, but foreshadows things it doesn’t follow through on very well, ending is boring and sappy.

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      About at the part where ::: spoiler spoiler Barbie is comforting Ken on the bed ::: I said to my partner “It feels like this movie has been ending for a while now,” and that was still a good way off from credits. I did appreciate that ::: spoiler spoiler Barbie and Ken didn’t end up together, it was a good message that men and women both need to be okay with themselves before they pursue a relationship. I loved the “I am Kenough” shirt. :::

      A few issues I had personally (oops wall of text lol): ::: spoiler spoiler They really hold their punches on toxic masculinity. There are no men who are outright misogynistic and believe women to be subhuman. They’re all just dumb and misguided. They also made a small attempt to point out that patriarchal society is negative for men too with the “sometimes I wish we could all have tickle fights” bit, but I do wish they would have dug a little deeper into how awful it is that men are expected to never have emotions and bottle up. It was also really weird that the kid called Barbie a fascist… It almost felt like they were using that word wrong on purpose to reduce its meaning, or get Republicans in the audience to roll their eyes at the stupid SJW calling everything they don’t like fascist. Also weird that at different points the movie claims Barbie saved women or set them back 50 years…like, it’s just a doll. Yes, a popular doll, but it’s weird to claim women gained or lost power in society solely because of a doll and not through the actions of feminists. :::

      I’m general, I’m happy with the film’s lessons, although it feels weird for Hollywood to be the one preaching them to me.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most of the scenes were pretty enjoyable in isolation. The problem I see is that it feels like they tried to combine two scripts to address the same issue from opposite directions. Either approach could have been good, but each one undercut the other so it just wound up confusedly sabotaging its message.

        • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I can agree with this, the messages got super muddy. They tried to say something about being a woman, being a man, and being a human, but all three were dulled from being stacked on top of each other.

          • ANALHACKER_3000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t think this at all. It’s a very dense movie, but I don’t think it suffered for it, and if anything actually enhanced the message that a lot of social expectations are murky and arbitrary.

            I’m planning on seeing it again.

      • LeylaLove@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I overall liked the movie but there were a lot of questionable moments in it. The point where they recognize that using Margot Robbie for some of their points kinda undercuts the points was odd to me. I also didn’t like the child of the movie, I didn’t feel like she was really a character.

        I really like the fun energy of the movie, it feels like a giant music video and I love that. But the social commentary moments are just so on the nose it just feels weird that it’s coming from a movie about Barbie. It feels like it can’t decide whether the audience is supposed to be children or nostalgic adults.

    • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I fully agree. It was a fun movie to see but that’s about it… they could have made such a good ending and set up a sequel