He also claims that they banned the letter “N” kekw

how can anyone take these people seriously?

    • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Checking that would require the viewer to have the intellectual curiosity to ask if what they’re being presented is true.

        • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is literally the same strategy used by the west in the “anti Stalin paradigm” which is a term coined by Grover Furr. In his many years of research into the Soviet Unions and western propaganda he states that basically the west can make up anything they want, any accusation at all, and if you question it in any way you are now a sympathizer with the accused and their made up crimes. So if I said Stalin personally strangled 100 children for no reason, and you ask me for a source, the reaction would be me accusing you of approving of Stalins strangling of 1000 children.

          As we see, this is a tactic they employ against any target they wish.

    • JTurtle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      supposedly, the many banned terms were quickly unbanned, but further reading would require being able to read Chinese. which i can’t.

      for comrades braver than me, here’s br*tmonkey’s source list for the video: https://pastebin.com/qNQbXyUE

      and the source for “letter N was banned” (from the guardian, notorious source of Unbiased™ reporting about china): https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/28/china-bans-the-letter-n-internet-xi-jinping-extends-power